National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Laboratory of Health and Environment Education, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;23(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15167-z.
Work from home (WFH) can impact workers´ sedentary behaviors and levels of physical activity. The aim of this study was to estimate the association between WFH and workers´ sedentary behaviors, leisure-time and domestic physical activities during the COVID-19 pandemic and verify whether age and sex may act as effect modifiers.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 2544 participants in the supplementary study on COVID-19 in the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) from July 2020 to February 2021. We assessed screen time (≤ 8 h/day versus > 8 h/day), accumulated sitting time (≤ 8 h/day versus > 8 h/day) as sedentary behaviors on a typical day, and leisure-time (active versus inactive, according to World Health Organization recommendations) and domestic (low versus high, according to median) physical activity, using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), before and during social distancing. Logistic regression models were used.
Participants that were working from home during social distancing showed increased odds of screen time and sitting time greater than 8 h/day (OR = 3.12; 95%CI: 2.32-4.20 and OR = 2.68; 95%CI: 2.02-3.56, respectively) and higher odds of high domestic physical activity (OR = 1.29; 95%CI: 0.99-1.67) when compared to those not working from home. There was no association between WFH and leisure-time physical activity (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.75,1.31). Age was an effect modifier in the association between WFH and leisure-time physical activity and domestic activity. Older people working from home showed higher odds of physical inactivity (OR = 1.84, 95%CI: 1.07,3.16) and high domestic physical activity (OR = 1.92, 95%CI: 1.12,3.27) compared to older people not working from home.
WFH was associated with sedentary behavior > 8 h/day and high domestic physical activity. In the older people, WFH was associated with physical inactivity and high domestic physical activity. As sedentary behavior and physical inactivity are consistently negatively associated with health, it is important to discuss policies to manage WFH that allow pauses from physical activities and performance of hours of work within preestablished limits to reduce sedentary behavior. In addition, individuals working from home, especially the older people, should be encouraged to engage in leisure-time physical activity as a form of health promotion.
居家办公(WFH)可能会影响员工的久坐行为和身体活动水平。本研究旨在估计 COVID-19 大流行期间 WFH 与员工久坐行为、休闲时间和国内身体活动之间的关联,并验证年龄和性别是否可能作为效应修饰剂。
我们对 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 2 月期间 COVID-19 补充研究中的 2544 名成人健康纵向研究(ELSA-Brasil)参与者进行了横断面研究。我们评估了屏幕时间(≤ 8 小时/天与> 8 小时/天)、日常累计久坐时间(≤ 8 小时/天与> 8 小时/天)作为久坐行为,根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的建议,使用国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)评估了休闲时间(活跃与不活跃)和国内(低与高,根据中位数)体力活动,在社会隔离之前和期间。使用逻辑回归模型。
与不在家工作的人相比,在社会隔离期间在家工作的人每天屏幕时间和久坐时间大于 8 小时的几率更高(OR = 3.12;95%CI:2.32-4.20 和 OR = 2.68;95%CI:2.02-3.56),进行高国内体力活动的几率更高(OR = 1.29;95%CI:0.99-1.67)。WFH 与休闲时间体力活动之间没有关联(OR = 0.99,95%CI:0.75,1.31)。年龄是 WFH 与休闲时间体力活动和国内活动之间关联的效应修饰剂。在家工作的老年人与不工作的老年人相比,体力活动不足(OR = 1.84,95%CI:1.07,3.16)和高国内体力活动(OR = 1.92,95%CI:1.12,3.27)的几率更高。
WFH 与> 8 小时/天的久坐行为和高国内体力活动有关。在老年人中,WFH 与体力活动不足和高国内体力活动有关。由于久坐行为和体力活动不足始终与健康呈负相关,因此有必要讨论管理 WFH 的政策,允许在设定的限制内暂停身体活动和工作时间,以减少久坐行为。此外,应鼓励在家工作的个人,尤其是老年人,参加休闲时间的体力活动,以促进健康。