McGuier Elizabeth A, Aarons Gregory A, Byrne Kara A, Campbell Kristine A, Keeshin Brooks, Rothenberger Scott D, Weingart Laurie R, Salas Eduardo, Kolko David J
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Feb 10;4(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00393-8.
Teams play a central role in the implementation of new practices in settings providing team-based care. However, the implementation science literature has paid little attention to potentially important team-level constructs. Aspects of teamwork, including team interdependence, team functioning, and team performance, may affect implementation processes and outcomes. This cross-sectional study tests associations between teamwork and implementation antecedents and outcomes in a statewide initiative to implement a standardized mental health screening/referral protocol in Child Advocacy Centers (CACs).
Multidisciplinary team members (N = 433) from 21 CACs completed measures of team interdependence; affective, behavioral, and cognitive team functioning; and team performance. Team members also rated the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the screening/referral protocol and implementation climate. The implementation outcomes of days to adoption and reach were independently assessed with administrative data. Associations between team constructs and implementation antecedents and outcomes were tested with linear mixed models and regression analyses.
Team task interdependence was positively associated with implementation climate and reach, and outcome interdependence was negatively correlated with days to adoption. Task and outcome interdependence were not associated with acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility of the screening/referral protocol. Affective team functioning (i.e., greater liking, trust, and respect) was associated with greater acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Behavioral and cognitive team functioning were not associated with any implementation outcomes in multivariable models. Team performance was positively associated with acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation climate; performance was not associated with days to adoption or reach.
We found associations of team interdependence, functioning, and performance with both individual- and center-level implementation outcomes. Implementation strategies targeting teamwork, especially task interdependence, affective functioning, and performance, may contribute to improving implementation outcomes in team-based service settings.
在提供团队式护理的环境中,团队在新实践的实施中发挥着核心作用。然而,实施科学文献很少关注潜在的重要团队层面的构念。团队合作的各个方面,包括团队相互依赖、团队功能和团队绩效,可能会影响实施过程和结果。这项横断面研究在一项全州范围内的倡议中测试了团队合作与实施前因和结果之间的关联,该倡议旨在儿童权益保护中心(CACs)实施标准化的心理健康筛查/转诊协议。
来自21个CACs的多学科团队成员(N = 433)完成了团队相互依赖的测量;情感、行为和认知团队功能;以及团队绩效。团队成员还对筛查/转诊协议和实施氛围的可接受性、适宜性和可行性进行了评分。采用行政数据独立评估采用天数和覆盖范围的实施结果。使用线性混合模型和回归分析测试团队构念与实施前因和结果之间的关联。
团队任务相互依赖与实施氛围和覆盖范围呈正相关,结果相互依赖与采用天数呈负相关。任务和结果相互依赖与筛查/转诊协议的可接受性、适宜性或可行性无关。情感团队功能(即更多的喜爱、信任和尊重)与更高的可接受性、适宜性和可行性相关。在多变量模型中,行为和认知团队功能与任何实施结果均无关联。团队绩效与可接受性、适宜性、可行性和实施氛围呈正相关;绩效与采用天数或覆盖范围无关。
我们发现团队相互依赖、功能和绩效与个人层面和中心层面的实施结果均有关联。针对团队合作的实施策略,尤其是任务相互依赖、情感功能和绩效,可能有助于改善团队式服务环境中的实施结果。