• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在团队中建立信任关系以支持人类服务中证据的使用与实施:一种培训与指导方法的可行性与可接受性

Building trusting relationships in teams to support evidence use and implementation in human services: feasibility and acceptability of a training and coaching approach.

作者信息

Metz Allison, Jensen Todd M, Dicharry Lacy, Farley Amanda B

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2024 Dec 10;4:1353741. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741
PMID:39726895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11670258/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Professionals who provide implementation support in human service systems describe relationships as being critical to support evidence use; however, developing trusting relationships are not strongly featured in implementation science literature. The aims of this study were to (a) assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven training and coaching approach for building trusting relationships among members of an implementation team who were supporting the implementation of an evidence-informed program in a public child welfare system in the United States and (b) gauge the initial efficacy of the approach in terms of the development of trusting relationships and subsequent implementation outcomes.

METHODS

Consistent with a convergent mixed-methods approach, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data to address our research questions. Quantitative methods included an adapted version of the Trusting Relationship Questionnaire, a seven-item measure of psychological safety, and items designed to measure acceptability of the training. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with participants.

RESULTS

Sixteen individuals participated in the program, consisting of a kick-off training event, five monthly training modules, and five monthly coaching sessions with implementation team leads. Session attendance rates and self-reported satisfaction highlight the general feasibility and acceptability of the training and coaching approach. On average, participants also reported significant increases over time in their perceptions that they were trusted by their team. Results from in-depth interviews further indicated the efficacy of the program in terms of cultivating trust among team members and promoting several elements that were theorized to link trusting relationships to implementation outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest the training and coaching approach for trust building was acceptable and feasible. Additionally, results indicate the value of the approach in building trust among implementation partners to increase commitment to implementation efforts, promote a culture of learning and psychological safety, and increase participants' sense of capability and motivation for supporting implementation.

摘要

背景

在人类服务系统中提供实施支持的专业人员认为,关系对于支持证据应用至关重要;然而,建立信任关系在实施科学文献中并未得到充分体现。本研究的目的是:(a)评估一种理论驱动的培训和指导方法的可行性和可接受性,该方法旨在在美国公共儿童福利系统中支持循证项目实施的实施团队成员之间建立信任关系;(b)从信任关系的发展以及后续实施结果方面衡量该方法的初步效果。

方法

采用收敛性混合方法,我们收集了定量和定性数据以回答研究问题。定量方法包括一份改编后的《信任关系问卷》、一份七项心理安全感量表以及旨在衡量培训可接受性的项目。定性数据通过对参与者进行半结构化访谈收集。

结果

16人参与了该项目,项目包括一次启动培训活动、五个月度培训模块以及与实施团队负责人进行的五次月度指导会议。课程出席率和自我报告的满意度突出了培训和指导方法的总体可行性和可接受性。平均而言,参与者还报告称,随着时间推移,他们感觉自己被团队信任的程度显著提高。深入访谈的结果进一步表明,该项目在培养团队成员之间的信任以及促进一些理论上认为可将信任关系与实施结果联系起来的要素方面具有成效。

讨论

研究结果表明,建立信任的培训和指导方法是可接受且可行的。此外,结果表明该方法在实施伙伴之间建立信任方面具有价值,可增强对实施工作的投入,促进学习文化和心理安全感,并增强参与者支持实施的能力感和动力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/bf22529866e7/frhs-04-1353741-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/0368d988c42e/frhs-04-1353741-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/bdc36d51a7c1/frhs-04-1353741-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/c6f6200f7e48/frhs-04-1353741-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/bf22529866e7/frhs-04-1353741-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/0368d988c42e/frhs-04-1353741-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/bdc36d51a7c1/frhs-04-1353741-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/c6f6200f7e48/frhs-04-1353741-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410b/11670258/bf22529866e7/frhs-04-1353741-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Building trusting relationships in teams to support evidence use and implementation in human services: feasibility and acceptability of a training and coaching approach.在团队中建立信任关系以支持人类服务中证据的使用与实施:一种培训与指导方法的可行性与可接受性
Front Health Serv. 2024 Dec 10;4:1353741. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741. eCollection 2024.
2
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
3
Feasibility study of a health coaching intervention to improve contraceptive continuation in adolescent and young adult women in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州费城一项健康指导干预措施改善青少年和年轻女性避孕措施持续使用的可行性研究。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Sep;53(3-4):27-43. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12188. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
Building trusting relationships to support implementation: A proposed theoretical model.建立信任关系以支持实施:一个拟议的理论模型。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 23;2:894599. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.894599. eCollection 2022.
5
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
6
Exploring research team members' and trial participants' perceptions of acceptability and implementation within one videoconference-based supportive care program for individuals affected by systemic sclerosis during COVID-19: a qualitative interview study.在 COVID-19 期间,通过基于视频会议的支持性护理计划,探索研究团队成员和试验参与者对受系统性硬化症影响个体的可接受性和实施的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):442-452. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac091.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Assessing the Satisfaction and Acceptability of an Online Parent Coaching Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Approach.评估在线家长指导干预的满意度和可接受性:一种混合方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:859145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859145. eCollection 2022.
9
Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.为多学科医疗保健专业人员提供迭代沟通伙伴培训计划:试点实施研究和过程评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):620-636. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12618. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Developing a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science: Perspectives from experienced implementation support practitioners.在实施科学中制定以实践为导向的研究议程:经验丰富的实施支持从业者的观点。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Sep 3;4:26334895231199063. doi: 10.1177/26334895231199063. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science: Perspectives from experienced implementation support practitioners.在实施科学中制定以实践为导向的研究议程:经验丰富的实施支持从业者的观点。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Sep 3;4:26334895231199063. doi: 10.1177/26334895231199063. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Advancing research on teams and team effectiveness in implementation science: An application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.推进实施科学中团队及团队效能的研究:探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架的应用
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jul 27;4:26334895231190855. doi: 10.1177/26334895231190855. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
A typology of power in implementation: Building on the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework to advance mental health and HIV health equity.
实施过程中的权力类型学:基于探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架以促进心理健康和艾滋病毒健康公平。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jan 5;3:26334895211064250. doi: 10.1177/26334895211064250. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Is implementation research out of step with implementation practice? Pathways to effective implementation support over the last decade.实施研究是否与实施实践脱节?过去十年实现有效实施支持的途径。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jun 6;3:26334895221105585. doi: 10.1177/26334895221105585. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Building trusting relationships to support implementation: A proposed theoretical model.建立信任关系以支持实施:一个拟议的理论模型。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 23;2:894599. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.894599. eCollection 2022.
6
What implementation strategies are relational? Using Relational Theory to explore the ERIC implementation strategies.哪些实施策略是关系型的?运用关系理论探索教育资源信息中心(ERIC)的实施策略。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Oct 17;2:913585. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.913585. eCollection 2022.
7
Associations between teamwork and implementation outcomes in multidisciplinary cross-sector teams implementing a mental health screening and referral protocol.在实施心理健康筛查与转诊方案的多学科跨部门团队中,团队合作与实施成果之间的关联。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Feb 10;4(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00393-8.
8
Knowledge and attitudes of Implementation Support Practitioners-Findings from a systematic integrative review.实施支持从业者的知识和态度——系统综合评价的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 May 11;17(5):e0267533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267533. eCollection 2022.
9
Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research.确定在传播与实施研究中促进团队科学的策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 9;4(3):180-187. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.413.
10
Implementation support practitioners - a proposal for consolidating a diverse evidence base.实施支持从业者——整合多样化证据基础的建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 1;20(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05145-1.