Graduate School, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610000, China.
School of Physical Education, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031731.
This study examined what footwear type influenced plantar pressure and lower extremity muscle activations in jump rope training. Ten healthy physical-education graduate students participated in this study. The biomechanical parameters during the jump rope training were collected by an AMTI force platform, a Novel Pedar-X insole and a wireless electromyography (EMG) system. The results of the force platform indicate that vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and contact time were much higher in the one-leg landing (both = 0.001). The GRF, GRF (BW) and Lat MF pressure were significantly greater in the one-leg landing ( = 0.018, 0.013 and 0.027); the pressure of the Lat MF and H area were significantly greater in the volleyball shoe ( = 0.025, 0.031); the pressure of the Mid FF and Lat FF area were significantly greater in the jumping shoe ( = 0.005, 0.042). No significant difference in EMG was found between footwear and landing conditions. In summary, the running shoe and jumping shoe might be a better choice for people who exercise. However, the running shoe is recommended for people when both jumping and running are required.
本研究探讨了不同类型的鞋子在跳绳训练中对足底压力和下肢肌肉激活的影响。十名健康的体育教育研究生参与了这项研究。跳绳训练期间的生物力学参数通过 AMTI 力台、Novel Pedar-X 鞋垫和无线肌电图（EMG）系统进行采集。力台的结果表明，单腿落地时垂直地面反作用力（vGRF）和接触时间更高（均=0.001）。单腿落地时 GRF、GRF（BW）和 Lat MF 压力显著更大（=0.018、0.013 和 0.027）；单腿落地时，排球鞋的 Lat MF 和 H 区域的压力显著更大（=0.025、0.031）；单腿落地时，跳跃鞋的 Mid FF 和 Lat FF 区域的压力显著更大（=0.005、0.042）。在 EMG 方面，鞋子和落地条件之间没有发现显著差异。综上所述，跑步鞋和跳跃鞋可能是运动人群的更好选择。然而，当需要跳跃和跑步时，建议选择跑步鞋。
