Suppr超能文献

电子香烟的化学成分和毒性:伞式评价及方法学考虑。

Chemical Profiles and Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes: An Umbrella Review and Methodological Considerations.

机构信息

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1908. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031908.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are often marketed as a safer alternative to combustible tobacco products. The global EC market has rapidly expanded since their introduction, creating an urgent need for research describing the toxicity and chemical composition of ECs. We conducted an umbrella review to summarize the evidence from existing systematic reviews (SRs).

METHODS

The search for SRs was conducted across four electronic databases through 25 January 2022. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-five SRs were included in our umbrella review. Chemical profiles widely varied across studies included in the reviews, which was mainly attributed to the lack of standardized protocols investigating the constituents, and differences in EC devices and e-liquids tested. Metals were more abundant in some EC aerosols than cigarettes, while carbonyls were typically found at lower levels. There was consistent evidence of in vitro toxicity from EC aerosol and e-liquid exposure. AMSTAR-2 revealed important limitations across reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

While most reviews concluded that ECs were likely less harmful than cigarettes, there was hesitancy to draw clear conclusions due to variable analytical procedures and inconsistent findings among the included studies. Future SRs with improved methodology and reporting are needed to adequately inform tobacco regulatory actions.

摘要

背景

电子烟通常被宣传为比可燃烟草产品更安全的替代品。自问世以来,全球电子烟市场迅速扩张,因此迫切需要研究来描述电子烟的毒性和化学成分。我们进行了一项伞式综述,以总结现有系统评价 (SR) 的证据。

方法

通过四个电子数据库进行了对 SRs 的搜索,截至 2022 年 1 月 25 日。使用 AMSTAR-2 质量评估工具评估方法学质量。

结果

我们的伞式综述共纳入了 25 项 SR。综述中包含的研究的化学成分差异很大,这主要归因于缺乏调查成分的标准化协议,以及测试的电子烟设备和电子烟液的差异。一些电子烟气溶胶中的金属比香烟中的金属更丰富,而羰基化合物的含量通常较低。有一致的证据表明,电子烟气溶胶和电子烟液暴露会导致体外毒性。AMSTAR-2 揭示了综述中存在的重要局限性。

结论

尽管大多数综述得出的结论是电子烟的危害可能比香烟小,但由于纳入研究中的分析程序不同且结果不一致,因此对于得出明确结论仍存在犹豫。需要具有改进方法和报告的未来 SR,以充分为烟草监管行动提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0a/9914618/094169159c11/ijerph-20-01908-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验