• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于研究自动化地铁系统应急情况的任务复杂度分析方法。

A Task Complexity Analysis Method to Study the Emergency Situation under Automated Metro System.

机构信息

Collaborative Innovation Center for HSR Driver Health and Safety, Zhengzhou Railway Vocational &Technical College, Zhengzhou 451460, China.

Henan Engineering Research Center of Rail Transit Intelligent Security, Zhengzhou Railway Vocational &Technical College, Zhengzhou 451460, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032314.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032314
PMID:36767680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916089/
Abstract

System upgrades and team members interactions lead to changes in task structure. Therefore, in order to handle emergencies efficiently and safely, a comprehensive method of the traffic dispatching team task complexity (TDTTC) is proposed based on team cognitive work analysis (Team-CWA) and network feature analysis. The method comes from the perspective of the socio-technical system. Two stages were included in this method. In the first stage, four phases of Team-CWA, i.e., team work domain analysis, team control task analysis, team strategies analysis, and team worker competencies analysis, were applied in the qualitative analysis of TDTTC. Then in the second stage, a mapping process was established based on events and information cues. After the team task network was established, the characteristic indexes of node degree/average degree, average shortest path length, agglomeration coefficient, and overall network performance for TDTTC were extracted to analyze TDTTC quantitatively. The cases of tasks for screen door fault under grade of automation GOA1-GOA4 were compared. The results revealed that the more nodes and communication between nodes, the larger the network scale was, which would lead to the TDTTC being more complicated no matter what level of automation system it was under. This method is not only the exploration of cognitive engineering theory in the field of task complexity, but also the innovation of team task complexity in the development of automatic metro operation.

摘要

系统升级和团队成员交互导致任务结构发生变化。因此,为了高效、安全地处理突发事件,提出了一种基于团队认知工作分析(Team-CWA)和网络特征分析的综合交通调度团队任务复杂性(TDTTC)方法。该方法源于社会技术系统的角度。该方法包括两个阶段。在第一阶段,应用 Team-CWA 的四个阶段,即团队工作域分析、团队控制任务分析、团队策略分析和团队工人能力分析,对 TDTTC 进行定性分析。然后在第二阶段,基于事件和信息线索建立映射过程。在建立团队任务网络后,提取 TDTTC 的节点度/平均度、平均最短路径长度、凝聚系数和整体网络性能等特征指标,对 TDTTC 进行定量分析。比较了自动化等级 GOA1-GOA4 下的屏蔽门故障任务案例。结果表明,节点越多,节点之间的通信越多,网络规模越大,无论自动化系统处于何种水平,TDTTC 都会变得更加复杂。该方法不仅是认知工程理论在任务复杂性领域的探索,也是自动地铁运行中团队任务复杂性发展的创新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/d1e5f96c75e5/ijerph-20-02314-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/58668b70fe14/ijerph-20-02314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/80de7c1b3881/ijerph-20-02314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/e55ae81ec2bb/ijerph-20-02314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/c7836b23f285/ijerph-20-02314-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/050c58b0285f/ijerph-20-02314-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/81ac5243b75f/ijerph-20-02314-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/d1e5f96c75e5/ijerph-20-02314-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/58668b70fe14/ijerph-20-02314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/80de7c1b3881/ijerph-20-02314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/e55ae81ec2bb/ijerph-20-02314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/c7836b23f285/ijerph-20-02314-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/050c58b0285f/ijerph-20-02314-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/81ac5243b75f/ijerph-20-02314-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1414/9916089/d1e5f96c75e5/ijerph-20-02314-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A Task Complexity Analysis Method to Study the Emergency Situation under Automated Metro System.一种用于研究自动化地铁系统应急情况的任务复杂度分析方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032314.
2
Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.网络化监控无人机的团队绩效:自动化、工作记忆和通信内容的影响。
Hum Factors. 2014 May;56(3):463-75. doi: 10.1177/0018720813496269.
3
Implicit Coordination Strategies for Effective Team Communication.有效团队沟通的隐性协调策略
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):595-610. doi: 10.1177/0018720816639712. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
4
Team talk and team activity in simulated medical emergencies: a discourse analytical approach.模拟医疗紧急情况中的团队讨论与团队活动:一种话语分析方法。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 14;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0325-1.
5
Task complexity in emergency medical care and its implications for team coordination. LOTAS Group. Level One Trauma Anesthesia Simulation.急诊医疗中的任务复杂性及其对团队协作的影响。LOTAS集团。一级创伤麻醉模拟。
Hum Factors. 1996 Dec;38(4):636-45. doi: 10.1518/001872096778827206.
6
Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.动态控制任务中自动化水平对绩效、态势感知和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 1999 Mar;42(3):462-92. doi: 10.1080/001401399185595.
7
Using team cognitive work analysis to reveal healthcare team interactions in a birthing unit.运用团队认知工作分析揭示产房中医护团队的互动情况。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(7):973-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.909949. Epub 2014 May 19.
8
Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments.在复杂操作环境中执行任务的人机协作团队中增强团队认知。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B63-70.
9
Contrasting models of driver behaviour in emergencies using retrospective verbalisations and network analysis.运用回顾性言语描述和网络分析对比紧急情况下驾驶员行为的不同模型。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(8):1337-46. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1005175. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
A Strategic Core Role Perspective on Team Coordination: Benefits of Centralized Leadership for Managing Task Complexity in the Operating Room.从战略核心角色角度看团队协调:手术室集中式领导对管理任务复杂性的益处。
Hum Factors. 2021 Aug;63(5):910-925. doi: 10.1177/0018720820906041. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of team workload on team performance in the light of task complexity: a study of nuclear fire brigades.团队工作量对团队绩效的影响:以核消防队为例。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023 Sep;29(3):1231-1240. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2118442. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Promoting passenger behaviour change with provision of occupancy information to help moderate train overcrowding: A cognitive work analysis approach.利用占有率信息促进乘客行为改变,以帮助缓解列车过度拥挤:认知工作分析方法。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Oct;104:103801. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103801. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
3
The role of transactive memory systems, psychological safety and interpersonal conflict in hospital team performance.
交互记忆系统、心理安全感和人际冲突在医院团队绩效中的作用。
Ergonomics. 2022 Mar;65(3):519-529. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2006771. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
4
25 Years of road safety: The journey from thinking humans to systems-thinking.25 年道路安全历程:从思考人类到系统思维。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103592. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103592. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
5
Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience.信任自动化:为响应性和恢复力而设计。
Hum Factors. 2023 Feb;65(1):137-165. doi: 10.1177/00187208211009995. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
6
Energy-Optimal Latency-Constrained Application Offloading in Mobile-Edge Computing.移动边缘计算中的能量最优、延迟受限的应用程序卸载。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 28;20(11):3064. doi: 10.3390/s20113064.
7
Critical Hazards Identification and Prevention of Cascading Escalator Accidents at Metro Rail Transit Stations.地铁车站自动扶梯事故级联的关键危害识别与预防。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 13;17(10):3400. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103400.
8
A hybrid human and organisational analysis method for railway accidents based on STAMP-HFACS and human information processing.基于 STAMP-HFACS 和人类信息处理的铁路事故混合人因分析方法
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:122-142. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
9
Combining network analysis with Cognitive Work Analysis: insights into social organisational and cooperation analysis.将网络分析与认知工作分析相结合:对社会、组织及合作分析的见解
Ergonomics. 2015;58(3):434-49. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.966770. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Using team cognitive work analysis to reveal healthcare team interactions in a birthing unit.运用团队认知工作分析揭示产房中医护团队的互动情况。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(7):973-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.909949. Epub 2014 May 19.