• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高校教师技术培训对残疾学生教育包容性和生活质量的影响:系统评价。

Impact of University Teachers' Technological Training on Educational Inclusion and Quality of Life of Students with Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Teaching and Educational Organization, University of Sevilla, 41004 Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032576.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032576
PMID:36767938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916174/
Abstract

Higher education institutions moving towards the inclusive education model have to offer quality education for all students. In this sense, the use of technologies favours not only the education of people with disabilities, but also their quality of life. However, these people may encounter real problems of access to technologies due, among other factors, to the lack of teacher training, causing a public health problem. In this line, our study includes a systematic review of the literature that aims to know the impact of the technological training of university teachers in relation to educational inclusion and the improvement of the quality of life of students with disabilities. To this end, a search of the literature published in the last decade was carried out in six databases (Dialnet, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and SciELO), selecting 14 articles out of 1204 initial ones. The studies were analysed following the PRISMA methodology. The main findings are the scarcity of research literature on the digital competence of university teachers and its impact on the educational inclusion and quality of life of students with disabilities. Likewise, there is a clear lack of knowledge about the use of digital tools and a lack of knowledge about the different disabilities that teachers may encounter in higher education classrooms.

摘要

高等教育机构向包容性教育模式转变,必须为所有学生提供优质教育。从这个意义上说,技术的使用不仅有利于残疾学生的教育,也有利于他们的生活质量。然而,这些人可能会因为缺乏教师培训等因素而遇到真正的技术获取问题,从而导致公共卫生问题。在这方面,我们的研究包括对文献的系统回顾,旨在了解大学教师在教育包容性和提高残疾学生生活质量方面的技术培训的影响。为此,我们在六个数据库(Dialnet、Google Scholar、Scopus、Web of Science、ERIC 和 SciELO)中搜索了过去十年发表的文献,从 1204 篇初始文献中选出了 14 篇文章。研究按照 PRISMA 方法进行分析。主要发现是,关于大学教师的数字能力及其对残疾学生教育包容性和生活质量的影响的研究文献稀缺。同样,人们对数字工具的使用知之甚少,也不了解教师在高等教育课堂上可能遇到的不同残疾类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/c69997f7c0d7/ijerph-20-02576-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/e3b0a45012bc/ijerph-20-02576-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/180de0d87fff/ijerph-20-02576-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/62b277a5d4a3/ijerph-20-02576-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/c22e4cbc7c87/ijerph-20-02576-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/c69997f7c0d7/ijerph-20-02576-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/e3b0a45012bc/ijerph-20-02576-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/180de0d87fff/ijerph-20-02576-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/62b277a5d4a3/ijerph-20-02576-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/c22e4cbc7c87/ijerph-20-02576-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d01f/9916174/c69997f7c0d7/ijerph-20-02576-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of University Teachers' Technological Training on Educational Inclusion and Quality of Life of Students with Disabilities: A Systematic Review.高校教师技术培训对残疾学生教育包容性和生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032576.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
5
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
6
Patient education interventions for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病管理的患者教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013854.pub2.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults.针对成人癌症相关疲劳管理的教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;11(11):CD008144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008144.pub2.
10
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge of university teachers on the use of digital resources to assist people with disabilities. The case of Spain.西班牙高校教师对利用数字资源帮助残疾人的认知情况
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(7):9015-9029. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10965-1. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
2
ICT, Disability, and Motivation: Validation of a Measurement Scale and Consequence Model for Inclusive Digital Knowledge.信息通信技术、残疾与动机:包容性数字知识测量量表与关联模型的有效性验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;18(13):6770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136770.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.