Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences & Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, Orbassano, 10043 Torino, TO, Italy.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 17;24(3):1818. doi: 10.3390/ijms24031818.
Regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves remains one of the main challenges of neurosurgery and regenerative medicine, a nerve functionality is rarely restored, especially after severe injuries. Researchers are constantly looking for innovative strategies for tackling this problem, with the development of advanced tissue-engineered nerve conduits and new pharmacological and physical interventions, with the aim of improving patients' life quality. Different evaluation methods can be used to study the effectiveness of a new treatment, including functional tests, morphological assessment of regenerated nerve fibers and biomolecular analyses of key factors necessary for good regeneration. The number and diversity of protocols and methods, as well as the availability of innovative technologies which are used to assess nerve regeneration after experimental interventions, often makes it difficult to compare results obtained in different labs. The purpose of the current review is to describe the main morphological approaches used to evaluate the degree of nerve fiber regeneration in terms of their usefulness and limitations.
受损周围神经的再生仍然是神经外科和再生医学的主要挑战之一,神经功能很少恢复,尤其是在严重损伤后。研究人员一直在寻找创新策略来解决这个问题,包括开发先进的组织工程神经导管和新的药理学和物理干预措施,旨在提高患者的生活质量。可以使用不同的评估方法来研究新治疗方法的有效性,包括功能测试、再生神经纤维的形态评估以及对良好再生所需的关键因素的生物分子分析。用于评估实验干预后神经再生的方案和方法的数量和多样性,以及创新技术的可用性,通常使得难以比较不同实验室获得的结果。本综述的目的是描述用于评估神经纤维再生程度的主要形态学方法,讨论其优缺点。