临界值与统计学显著性
On -Values and Statistical Significance.
作者信息
Bonovas Stefanos, Piovani Daniele
机构信息
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
出版信息
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 23;12(3):900. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030900.
Abstract
At the beginning of our research training, we learned about hypothesis testing, -values, and statistical inference [...].
摘要
在我们研究训练开始时，我们学习了假设检验、p值和统计推断[……]。
相似文献
1
On -Values and Statistical Significance.临界值与统计学显著性
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 23;12(3):900. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030900.
2
Basic principles of statistical inference.统计推断的基本原理。
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;404:53-72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_4.
3
A Reckless Guide to P-values : Local Evidence, Global Errors.P值的轻率指南：局部证据，全局错误。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2020;257:223-256. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_286.
4
The reporting of values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997-2017).《预防兽医学》（1997 - 2017年）中数值、置信区间及统计学显著性的报告
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 24;9:e12453. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12453. eCollection 2021.
5
A Test by Any Other Name: P Values, Bayes Factors, and Statistical Inference.换个名字的检验：P 值、贝叶斯因子与统计推断
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51(1):23-9. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1099032.
6
Pervasive errors in hypothesis testing: Toward better statistical practice in nursing research.假设检验中的普遍错误：走向护理研究中更好的统计实践。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Oct;98:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
7
The Harm Done to Reproducibility by the Culture of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.《零假设显著性检验文化对可重复性造成的危害》
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep 15;186(6):627-635. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx261.
8
Statistical inference: hypothesis testing.统计推断：假设检验。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2010 Sep-Oct;38(5):266-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2010.06.003.
9
Significance test for linear regression: how to test without -values?线性回归的显著性检验：如何在不使用p值的情况下进行检验？
J Appl Stat. 2020 Mar 31;48(5):827-845. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1748180. eCollection 2021.
10
For and Against Methodologies: Some Perspectives on Recent Causal and Statistical Inference Debates.赞成与反对方法论：对近期因果推断和统计推断争议的一些观点。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):3-20. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0230-6. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Alternative to the statistical mass confusion of testing for "no effect".替代对“无效应”进行检验时的统计大规模混淆。
J Cell Biol. 2025 Aug 4;224(8). doi: 10.1083/jcb.202403034. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Alternative to the statistical mass confusion of testing for "no effect".用于检验“无效应”的统计学大规模混淆的替代方法。
ArXiv. 2025 May 12:arXiv:2407.07114v3.
3
Inferential statistics for cardiothoracic surgeons: Part 3 - drawing valid conclusions from clinical data.心胸外科医生的推断统计学：第3部分——从临床数据中得出有效结论
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Feb;41(2):233-247. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01867-7. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Iron Supply of Multivitamins-Multiminerals Commercialized Online by Amazon in Western and Southern Europe: A Labeling Analysis.欧美亚马逊商业化销售的多种维生素-多种矿物质制剂的铁元素供应情况：标签分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 17;16(18):3140. doi: 10.3390/nu16183140.
5
Traditional ecological knowledge for monitoring Anaphalis javanica (DC.) Sch.Bip. (Asteraceae) in Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park, Indonesia.用于监测印度尼西亚布罗莫腾格尔塞梅鲁国家公园豚草（Asteraceae）的传统生态知识。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Jul 9;196(8):717. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12869-8.
6
Prevalence and association of oral manifestations with disease severity in patients diagnosed with COVID‑19: A cross‑sectional study.新冠肺炎确诊患者口腔表现的患病率及其与疾病严重程度的关联：一项横断面研究。
Med Int (Lond). 2024 Apr 10;4(3):30. doi: 10.3892/mi.2024.154. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
7
Differential gene expression analysis pipelines and bioinformatic tools for the identification of specific biomarkers: A review.用于鉴定特定生物标志物的差异基因表达分析流程和生物信息学工具：综述
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Mar 1;23:1154-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.02.018. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Simpson's Paradox in Clinical Research: A Cautionary Tale.临床研究中的辛普森悖论：一则警示故事。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 18;12(4):1633. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041633.
本文引用的文献
1
Real World-Big Data Analytics in Healthcare.真实世界-医疗保健中的大数据分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811677.
2
Addressing Common Misuses and Pitfalls of P values in Biomedical Research.解决生物医学研究中 P 值常见误用和陷阱。
Cancer Res. 2022 Aug 3;82(15):2674-2677. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-2978.
3
The Importance of Predefined Rules and Prespecified Statistical Analyses: Do Not Abandon Significance.预定义规则和预先指定的统计分析的重要性：不要摒弃显著性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 4;321(21):2067-2068. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4582.
4
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.科学家们奋起反对统计显著性。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
5
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.统计检验、P 值、置信区间与检验效能：误解指南
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.变化无常的P值会产生不可重复的结果。
Nat Methods. 2015 Mar;12(3):179-85. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3288.
7
Scientific method: statistical errors.科学方法：统计误差
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):150-2. doi: 10.1038/506150a.
8
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network.透明准确的报告可提高研究的可靠性、实用性和影响力：报告指南和 EQUATOR 网络。
BMC Med. 2010 Apr 26;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24.
9
A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions.有害的十二个：十二个p值误解
Semin Hematol. 2008 Jul;45(3):135-40. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.003.
10
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
Zotero 插件