一种用于局部颏下脂肪体积的有效评估量表的研究

The Study of a Validated Assessment Scale for a Localized Submental Fat Volume.

作者信息

Oh Joon-Seok, Choi Jinil, Choi Jong-Woo, Lew Dae-Hyun, Roh Tai-Suk, Song Seung-Yong, Kim Young-Seok, Park Hojin, Youn Sang-Woong, Kang Shinhyuk, Park Jihyun, Oh Jeongseok, Heo Chan-Yeong

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 3;12(3):1226. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031226.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12031226

PMID:36769877

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9917764/

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This aim of this study was to develop an objective tool for rating submental fat applied to Koreans.

METHODS

The study was conducted between April 2019 and October 2019. A total of 92 subjects were enrolled in the study. Clinical photos of the subjects were categorized using validated CR-SMFRS by three plastic surgeons and one dermatologist. The categorized photos were then shown to six different plastic surgeons for evaluation.

RESULTS

The Cohen's kappa value for the six raters were 0.830, 0.742, 0.703, 0.907, 0.862, and 0.793 with statistical significance ( < 0.001). ICC value was between 0.860 and 0.966 ( < 0.001). Since the Cohen's value and ICC were above 0.6 for all raters, the ratings performed by all six raters were used in the analysis. The ICC values between raters were between 0.899 and 0.902.

CONCLUSIONS

We came up with a set of reference photos that can be used for submental fat rating scale applicable to Korean subjects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是开发一种适用于韩国人的客观颏下脂肪评分工具。

方法

该研究于2019年4月至2019年10月进行。共有92名受试者参与该研究。由三名整形外科医生和一名皮肤科医生使用经过验证的CR-SMFRS对受试者的临床照片进行分类。然后将分类后的照片展示给六名不同的整形外科医生进行评估。

结果

六位评估者的Cohen's kappa值分别为0.830、0.742、0.703、0.907、0.862和0.793，具有统计学意义（<0.001）。ICC值在0.860至0.966之间（<0.001）。由于所有评估者的Cohen's值和ICC均高于0.6，因此在分析中使用了所有六位评估者的评分。评估者之间的ICC值在0.899至0.902之间。