Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Jun 8;115(6):636-643. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad027.
To inform reasons contributing to Black-White disparity in early diagnosis of uterine cancer, we compared the quality of diagnostic evaluation received by Black vs White patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) ultimately diagnosed with uterine cancer.
Using 2008-2019 MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database, we identified Black (n = 858) and White (n = 1749) patients with uterine cancer presenting with AUB. Quality of diagnostic evaluation was measured by delayed diagnosis (>1 year after AUB reporting), not receiving guideline-recommended diagnostic procedures, delayed time to first diagnostic procedure (>2 months after AUB reporting), number of diagnostic procedures received, and number of evaluation and management visits for AUB. The association between race and quality indicators was examined by multivariable regressions adjusting for patient characteristics.
Black patients were more likely than White patients to experience delayed diagnosis (11.3% vs 8.3%, P = .01; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 2.29) or to not receive guideline-recommended diagnostic procedures (10.1% vs 5.0%, P < .001; adjusted OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.40 to 2.68). Even when they did receive recommended diagnostic procedures, Black patients were more likely than White patients to experience delay in time to the first diagnostic procedure (adjusted OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.97). In addition, Black patients underwent more evaluation and management visits for AUB before getting diagnosed compared with White patients (adjusted mean ratio = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.23).
Black and White patients with uterine cancer differed in the quality of diagnostic evaluation received. Improving equity in this area may help reduce Black-White disparity in stage at diagnosis.
为了明确导致黑人与白人在子宫癌早期诊断中存在差异的原因,我们比较了因异常子宫出血(AUB)就诊最终被诊断为子宫癌的黑人患者和白人患者接受的诊断评估质量。
我们利用 2008 年至 2019 年市场扫描多州医疗补助数据库,确定了 858 名黑人(黑人组)和 1749 名白人(白人组)患有 AUB 的子宫癌患者。诊断评估质量通过以下指标进行衡量:诊断延迟(在报告 AUB 后 1 年以上)、未接受指南推荐的诊断程序、首次诊断程序的延迟时间(在报告 AUB 后 2 个月以上)、接受的诊断程序数量和 AUB 的评估和管理就诊次数。通过多变量回归调整患者特征,比较了种族与质量指标之间的关系。
与白人患者相比,黑人患者更有可能出现诊断延迟(11.3%比 8.3%,P = .01;调整后的优势比[OR] = 1.71,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.27 至 2.29)或未接受指南推荐的诊断程序(10.1%比 5.0%,P < .001;调整后的 OR = 1.94,95% CI = 1.40 至 2.68)。即使他们确实接受了推荐的诊断程序,黑人患者也比白人患者更有可能出现首次诊断程序的延迟(调整后的 OR = 1.46,95% CI = 1.09 至 1.97)。此外,黑人患者在确诊前接受 AUB 的评估和管理就诊次数多于白人患者(调整后的平均比值 = 1.13,95% CI = 1.04 至 1.23)。
患有子宫癌的黑人和白人患者在接受的诊断评估质量方面存在差异。改善这一领域的公平性可能有助于减少诊断阶段的黑人和白人之间的差异。