Quenot Jean-Pierre, Meunier-Beillard Nicolas, Ksiazek Eléa, Abdulmalak Caroline, Ecarnot Fiona, Roudaut Jean-Baptiste, Andreu Pascal, Aptel François, Labruyère Marie, Jacquier Marine, Rigaud Jean-Philippe
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon 21000, France.
Lipness Team, INSERM Research Centre LNC-UMR1231 and LabEx LipSTIC, University of Burgundy, Dijon 21000, France.
J Intensive Med. 2022 Jun 27;2(4):268-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.04.005. eCollection 2022 Oct.
We investigated the criteria that hospitalized patients in intensive care units (ICUs) deem important when designating relatives who are best qualified to interact with the caregiving staff.
We conducted an exploratory, observational, prospective, multicenter study between March 1, 2018, and October 31, 2018, within two ICUs. A 12-item questionnaire was distributed to patients in the ICUs by the investigating physicians. Patients were considered eligible if they had a good understanding of the French language and if they had not officially designated surrogates before ICU admission.
Seventy-one patients whose average age was 63.9± 17.3 years, of whom 21 (29.5%) were females, completed the questionnaire. The average Charlson comorbidity score was 2.5 ± 2.4, and the average Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) was 39.8 ± 16.5. The main etiology was respiratory infection (40.8%), followed by sepsis (23.9%). The most important criteria identified by patients when selecting reference persons were a good knowledge of the patient's wishes and values, an emotional attachment to the patient, and being a family member.
Our findings reveal that ICU patients considered the following criteria to be critical when designating reference persons: knowledge of their wishes and the existence of emotional and family attachments.
我们调查了重症监护病房(ICU)的住院患者在指定最有资格与护理人员互动的亲属时认为重要的标准。
2018年3月1日至2018年10月31日期间,我们在两个ICU内进行了一项探索性、观察性、前瞻性多中心研究。调查医生向ICU患者发放了一份包含12个条目的问卷。如果患者对法语有较好的理解,并且在入住ICU之前没有正式指定代理人,则被认为符合条件。
71名平均年龄为63.9±17.3岁的患者完成了问卷,其中21名(29.5%)为女性。Charlson合并症平均评分为2.5±2.4,简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)平均为39.8±16.5。主要病因是呼吸道感染(40.8%),其次是败血症(23.9%)。患者在选择参考人员时确定的最重要标准是对患者愿望和价值观的充分了解、对患者的情感依恋以及是家庭成员。
我们的研究结果表明,ICU患者在指定参考人员时认为以下标准至关重要:了解他们的愿望以及存在情感和家庭依恋关系。