Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Society of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Prospect, IL.
Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 1;51(4):445-459. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005802. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
The COVID-19 pandemic threatened standard hospital operations. We sought to understand how this stress was perceived and manifested within individual hospitals and in relation to local viral activity.
Prospective weekly hospital stress survey, November 2020-June 2022.
Society of Critical Care Medicine's Discovery Severe Acute Respiratory Infection-Preparedness multicenter cohort study.
Thirteen hospitals across seven U.S. health systems.
None.
We analyzed 839 hospital-weeks of data over 85 pandemic weeks and five viral surges. Perceived overall hospital, ICU, and emergency department (ED) stress due to severe acute respiratory infection patients during the pandemic were reported by a mean of 43% ( sd , 36%), 32% (30%), and 14% (22%) of hospitals per week, respectively, and perceived care deviations in a mean of 36% (33%). Overall hospital stress was highly correlated with ICU stress (ρ = 0.82; p < 0.0001) but only moderately correlated with ED stress (ρ = 0.52; p < 0.0001). A county increase in 10 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 cases per 100,000 residents was associated with an increase in the odds of overall hospital, ICU, and ED stress by 9% (95% CI, 5-12%), 7% (3-10%), and 4% (2-6%), respectively. During the Delta variant surge, overall hospital stress persisted for a median of 11.5 weeks (interquartile range, 9-14 wk) after local case peak. ICU stress had a similar pattern of resolution (median 11 wk [6-14 wk] after local case peak; p = 0.59) while the resolution of ED stress (median 6 wk [5-6 wk] after local case peak; p = 0.003) was earlier. There was a similar but attenuated pattern during the Omicron BA.1 subvariant surge.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, perceived care deviations were common and potentially avoidable patient harm was rare. Perceived hospital stress persisted for weeks after surges peaked.
新冠疫情大流行威胁着医院的正常运转。本研究旨在了解医院内部和当地病毒活动相关的压力是如何被感知和表现出来的。
前瞻性的医院压力每周调查,2020 年 11 月至 2022 年 6 月。
美国七个医疗系统的重症监护医学会发现严重急性呼吸道感染准备多中心队列研究。
来自美国七个医疗系统的 13 家医院。
无。
在 85 个疫情周和 5 个病毒激增周中,我们分析了 839 个医院周的数据。每周分别有 43%(标准差为 36%)、32%(30%)和 14%(22%)的医院报告了大流行期间因严重急性呼吸道感染患者而导致的整体医院、重症监护病房和急诊科压力,每周平均有 36%(33%)的医院报告了护理偏差。整体医院压力与 ICU 压力高度相关(ρ=0.82;p<0.0001),但与急诊科压力仅中度相关(ρ=0.52;p<0.0001)。每 100,000 居民中增加 10 例严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 例与整体医院、重症监护病房和急诊科压力的几率增加 9%(95%置信区间,5-12%)、7%(3-10%)和 4%(2-6%)相关。在 Delta 变体激增期间,当地病例高峰后,整体医院压力中位数持续了 11.5 周(四分位距,9-14 周)。ICU 压力的缓解模式相似(当地病例高峰后中位数 11 周[6-14 周];p=0.59),而急诊科压力的缓解模式更早(当地病例高峰后中位数 6 周[5-6 周];p=0.003)。Omicron BA.1 亚变体激增期间也出现了类似但减弱的模式。
在新冠疫情大流行期间,常见的是感知到的护理偏差,而潜在的可避免的患者伤害很少。医院压力在疫情高峰期过后数周内持续存在。