Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-St. Louis.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1388-1411. doi: 10.1177/17456916221148142. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
Research and theory in nonverbal communication have made great advances toward understanding the patterns and functions of nonverbal behavior in social settings. Progress has been hindered, we argue, by presumptions about nonverbal behavior that follow from both received wisdom and faulty evidence. In this article, we document four persistent misconceptions about nonverbal communication-namely, that people communicate using decodable body language; that they have a stable personal space by which they regulate contact with others; that they express emotion using universal, evolved, iconic, categorical facial expressions; and that they can deceive and detect deception, using dependable telltale clues. We show how these misconceptions permeate research as well as the practices of popular behavior experts, with consequences that extend from intimate relationships to the boardroom and courtroom and even to the arena of international security. Notwithstanding these misconceptions, existing frameworks of nonverbal communication are being challenged by more comprehensive systems approaches and by virtual technologies that ambiguate the roles and identities of interactants and the contexts of interaction.
非言语交际的研究和理论在理解社会环境中非言语行为的模式和功能方面已经取得了很大的进展。我们认为,由于既有的观念和错误的证据,非言语行为的假设阻碍了这一进展。在本文中,我们记录了关于非言语交际的四个持久误解——即人们使用可解码的肢体语言进行交流;他们有一个稳定的个人空间,通过这个空间来调节与他人的接触;他们使用普遍的、进化的、标志性的、分类的面部表情来表达情感;以及他们可以使用可靠的明显线索来欺骗和察觉欺骗。我们展示了这些误解是如何渗透到研究以及流行行为专家的实践中的,其影响范围从亲密关系到董事会和法庭,甚至到国际安全领域。尽管存在这些误解,但非言语交际的现有框架正受到更全面的系统方法和虚拟技术的挑战,这些方法和技术使互动者的角色和身份以及互动的背景变得模糊不清。