• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Non-verbal cues in eyewitness testimonies do not predict accuracy or credibility assessments.目击者证词中的非语言线索并不能预测准确性或可信度评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89825-0.
2
Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy.检索努力线索可预测目击证人的准确性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Dec;24(4):534-542. doi: 10.1037/xap0000175. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理评估口头目击证人的置信度陈述。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;35(3):277-287. doi: 10.1177/09567976241229028. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
The effect of cross-examination style questions on adult eyewitness accuracy depends on question type and eyewitness confidence.交叉讯问方式对成人目击证人准确性的影响取决于问题类型和目击证人的信心。
Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):163-178. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2129066. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
5
On the importance of considering heterogeneity in witnesses' competence levels when reconstructing crimes from multiple witness testimonies.论从多个证人证言重建犯罪时考虑证人能力水平异质性的重要性。
Psychol Res. 2017 Sep;81(5):947-960. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0802-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6
Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance.使用元记忆测量和记忆测试来估计目击证人的自由回忆表现。
Memory. 2020 Jan;28(1):94-106. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Predicting Accuracy in Eyewitness Testimonies With Memory Retrieval Effort and Confidence.通过记忆检索努力和信心预测目击证人证词的准确性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00703. eCollection 2019.
8
Witnessing-condition information differentially affects evaluations of high- and moderate-confidence eyewitness identifications.目击条件信息会对高可信度和中可信度目击证人辨认的评估产生差异影响。
Cognition. 2024 Sep;250:105841. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105841. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
9
Context influences interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements.背景会影响对目击证人信心陈述的解读。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Apr;41(2):180-190. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000216. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
10
Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities.模拟陪审员对智障儿童给出的目击证人报告的看法。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Sep 26. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06561-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of nonverbal communication when assessing witness credibility: a view from the bench.评估证人可信度时非语言沟通的运用:来自法官席的观点。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 23;31(1):97-120. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2175068. eCollection 2024.
2
Memory accuracy, suggestibility and credibility in investigative interviews with native and non-native eyewitnesses.对母语和非母语目击者进行调查询问时的记忆准确性、易受暗示性和可信度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1240822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240822. eCollection 2023.
3
Four Misconceptions About Nonverbal Communication.非言语交际的四个误区
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1388-1411. doi: 10.1177/17456916221148142. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
4
Eyewitness accuracy and retrieval effort: Effects of time and repetition.目击证人准确性与检索努力:时间和重复的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 7;17(9):e0273455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273455. eCollection 2022.
5
The Number of Senders and Total Judgments Matter More Than Sample Size in Deception-Detection Experiments.在欺骗检测实验中,发送者的数量和总判断数比样本大小更重要。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):191-204. doi: 10.1177/1745691621990369. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
6
Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated.从《木偶奇遇记》中得到的启示:欺骗的线索可能被高度夸大了。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Jul;14(4):646-671. doi: 10.1177/1745691619838258. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
Prosody in the Auditory and Visual Domains: A Developmental Perspective.听觉和视觉领域的韵律:发展视角
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 19;9:338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00338. eCollection 2018.
8
Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.为什么测谎者会失败?人类谎言判断的透镜模型元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):643-59. doi: 10.1037/a0023589.
9
Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.在高度一致的情况下计算评分者间信度及其方差。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 May;61(Pt 1):29-48. doi: 10.1348/000711006X126600.
10
Credibility of the emotional witness: a study of ratings by court judges.
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Apr;30(2):221-30. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9024-1.

目击者证词中的非语言线索并不能预测准确性或可信度评估。

Non-verbal cues in eyewitness testimonies do not predict accuracy or credibility assessments.

作者信息

Raver Arman, Lindholm Torun, Alm Charlotte

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89825-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-89825-0
PMID:39939728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11821912/
Abstract

Non-verbal behaviour, such as facial expressions and body language, plays a critical role in assessments of witnesses' credibility that inform legal decisions in cases involving crime. While prior research has primarily focused on associations between non-verbal cues and deception, this study investigates the relation between non-verbal cues and recall memory accuracy in honestly reported mock eyewitness testimonies. Using a sample of 36 video-recorded eyewitness testimonies about a violent crime (n = 680 statements), we examined whether non-verbal cues were associated with statement accuracy (correct vs. incorrect), witness credibility as rated by independent observers, and witnesses' self-reported confidence. Additionally, we explored whether these associations differed for native vs. non-native speaking witnesses. Results revealed no associations between non-verbal cues and statement accuracy or perceived credibility. Furthermore, while non-native speakers were perceived as less credible, these perceptions were not related to non-verbal cues. Our findings contradict common beliefs by showing that non-verbal behaviour is not reliably related to accuracy or perceived credibility in eyewitness testimonies, highlighting the need for caution in their use in high-stakes legal contexts.

摘要

非言语行为,如面部表情和肢体语言,在对证人可信度的评估中起着关键作用,而这些评估会为涉及犯罪案件的法律裁决提供依据。虽然先前的研究主要关注非言语线索与欺骗之间的关联,但本研究调查了在如实陈述的模拟目击证人证词中,非言语线索与回忆记忆准确性之间的关系。我们采用了36份关于一起暴力犯罪的视频记录目击证人证词样本(共680份陈述),研究非言语线索是否与陈述准确性(正确与错误)、独立观察者评定的证人可信度以及证人自我报告的信心相关。此外,我们还探讨了这些关联在以母语为母语的证人和非母语证人之间是否存在差异。结果显示,非言语线索与陈述准确性或感知到的可信度之间没有关联。此外,虽然非母语证人被认为可信度较低,但这些看法与非言语线索无关。我们的研究结果与普遍看法相悖,表明非言语行为与目击证人证词的准确性或感知到的可信度并无可靠关联,这凸显了在高风险法律背景下使用非言语行为时需谨慎的必要性。