• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们了解自己的视觉偏好吗?

Do we know our visual preferences?

机构信息

Cognitive and Brain Sciences Department, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.

Psychology Department, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Vis. 2023 Feb 1;23(2):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.2.9.

DOI:10.1167/jov.23.2.9
PMID:36799868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942782/
Abstract

Humans differ in the amount of time they direct their gaze toward different types of stimuli. Individuals' preferences are known to be reliable and can predict various cognitive and affective processes. However, it remains unclear whether humans are aware of their visual gaze preferences and are able to report it. In this study, across three different tasks and without prior warning, participants were asked to estimate the amount of time they had looked at a certain visual content (e.g., faces or texts) at the end of each experiment. The findings show that people can report accurately their visual gaze preferences. The implications are discussed in the context of visual perception, metacognition, and the development of applied diagnostic tools based on eye tracking.

摘要

人类在注视不同类型刺激的时间上存在差异。个体的偏好是已知的,并且可以预测各种认知和情感过程。然而,目前尚不清楚人类是否意识到自己的视觉注视偏好,以及是否能够报告这种偏好。在这项研究中,在三个不同的任务中,参与者在没有事先警告的情况下,被要求在每次实验结束时估计他们看某一特定视觉内容(例如面孔或文本)的时间量。研究结果表明,人们可以准确报告自己的视觉注视偏好。这些发现对于视觉感知、元认知以及基于眼动追踪的应用诊断工具的发展具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6eb/9942782/4c2e08bcb2af/jovi-23-2-9-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6eb/9942782/830016c4d2db/jovi-23-2-9-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6eb/9942782/cc3d92ec9a88/jovi-23-2-9-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6eb/9942782/4c2e08bcb2af/jovi-23-2-9-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6eb/9942782/830016c4d2db/jovi-23-2-9-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6eb/9942782/cc3d92ec9a88/jovi-23-2-9-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6eb/9942782/4c2e08bcb2af/jovi-23-2-9-f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Do we know our visual preferences?我们了解自己的视觉偏好吗?
J Vis. 2023 Feb 1;23(2):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.2.9.
2
The development of visual preferences for direct versus averted gaze faces in infant macaques (Macaca mulatta).猕猴幼崽(恒河猴)对直视与回避目光面孔的视觉偏好发展。
Dev Psychobiol. 2016 Dec;58(8):926-936. doi: 10.1002/dev.21421. Epub 2016 May 19.
3
A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.一种新颖的知觉特征:在视觉探索过程中,目光偏爱人脸。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47110-x.
4
Gaze direction influences awareness in recognition memory for faces after intentional learning.在有意学习后,注视方向会影响对面孔的识别记忆中的意识。
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Aug;109(1):224-34. doi: 10.2466/PMS.109.1.224-234.
5
Gaze behaviour in audiovisual speech perception: asymmetrical distribution of face-directed fixations.视听言语感知中的注视行为:面向面部注视的不对称分布。
Perception. 2007;36(10):1535-45. doi: 10.1068/p5852.
6
A study of impaired judgment of eye-gaze direction and related face-processing deficits in autism spectrum disorders.一项关于自闭症谱系障碍中注视方向判断受损及相关面部加工缺陷的研究。
Perception. 2006;35(12):1651-64. doi: 10.1068/p5442.
7
Making eye contact without awareness.无意识地进行眼神交流。
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
8
Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness.注视引起的注意力转移是在无意识的情况下触发的。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1025-x. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
9
Affect in the eyes: explicit and implicit evaluations.眼睛中的情感:显性与隐性评估。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Sep;31(6):1070-1082. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1188059. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
10
Hidden intentions: Visual awareness prioritizes perceived attention even without eyes or faces.潜在意图:即使没有眼睛或面部,视觉意识也会优先考虑感知到的注意力。
Cognition. 2021 Dec;217:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104901. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Individuals vary in their overt attention preference for positive images consistently across time and stimulus types.个体在不同时间和刺激类型下对正性图像的显性注意偏好存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58987-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Minority salience and the overestimation of individuals from minority groups in perception and memory.少数群体突显与对少数群体个体的感知和记忆高估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 22;119(12):e2116884119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116884119. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.一种新颖的知觉特征:在视觉探索过程中,目光偏爱人脸。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47110-x.
3
Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.
个体间在视觉显著性上的差异会沿着语义维度发生变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11687-11692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820553116. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Food-Pics_Extended-An Image Database for Experimental Research on Eating and Appetite: Additional Images, Normative Ratings and an Updated Review.《食物图片扩展版——用于饮食与食欲实验研究的图像数据库:额外图像、规范评分及更新综述》
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 7;10:307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00307. eCollection 2019.
5
The reliability of attentional biases for emotional images measured using a free-viewing eye-tracking paradigm.使用自由观看眼动追踪范式测量情绪图像注意力偏差的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2748-2760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1147-z.
6
Attentional Selection of Social Features Persists Despite Restricted Bottom-Up Information and Affects Temporal Viewing Dynamics.尽管受到限制的自下而上信息的影响,社会特征的注意力选择仍然存在,并影响时间观看动态。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30736-8.
7
Infants' attention bias to faces as an early marker of social development.婴儿对面部的注意力偏向是社会发展的早期标志。
Dev Sci. 2018 Nov;21(6):e12687. doi: 10.1111/desc.12687. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
Free viewing of sad and happy faces in depression: A potential target for attention bias modification.抑郁症患者观看悲伤和快乐的面孔时无需付费:一种潜在的注意力偏向修正目标。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.047. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task.点探测任务中的短暂可靠性。
Psychol Res. 2019 Mar;83(2):308-320. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0947-6. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Online webcam-based eye tracking in cognitive science: A first look.在线基于网络摄像头的眼动追踪在认知科学中的应用:初探。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Apr;50(2):451-465. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0913-7.