Nelson Blessie Elizabeth, Roszik Jason, Janku Filip, Hong David S, Kato Shumei, Naing Aung, Piha-Paul Sarina, Fu Siqing, Tsimberidou Apostolia, Cabanillas Maria, Busaidy Naifa Lamki, Javle Milind, Byers Lauren Averett, Heymach John V, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Subbiah Vivek
Departments of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Feb 18;7(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00341-0.
Combined BRAF + MEK inhibition is FDA approved for BRAF V600E-mutant solid tumors except for colorectal cancer. However, beyond MAPK mediated resistance several other mechanisms of resistance such as activation of CRAF, ARAF, MET, P13K/AKT/mTOR pathway exist among other complex pathways. In the VEM-PLUS study, we performed a pooled analysis of four phase one studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of vemurafenib monotherapy and vemurafenib combined with targeted therapies (sorafenib, crizotinib, or everolimus) or carboplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced solid tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations. When vemurafenib monotherapy was compared with the combination regimens, no significant differences in OS or PFS durations were noted, except for inferior OS in the vemurafenib and paclitaxel and carboplatin trial (P = 0.011; HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.22-4.7) and in crossover patients (P = 0.0025; HR, 2.089; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4). Patients naïve to prior BRAF inhibitors had statistically significantly improved OS at 12.6 months compared to 10.4 months in the BRAF therapy refractory group (P = 0.024; HR, 1.69; 95% CI 1.07-2.68). The median PFS was statistically significant between both groups, with 7 months in the BRAF therapy naïve group compared to 4.7 months in the BRAF therapy refractory group (P = 0.016; HR, 1.80; 95% CI 1.11-2.91). The confirmed ORR in the vemurafenib monotherapy trial (28%) was higher than that in the combination trials. Our findings suggest that, compared with vemurafenib monotherapy, combinations of vemurafenib with cytotoxic chemotherapy or with RAF- or mTOR-targeting agents do not significantly extend the OS or PFS of patients who have solid tumors with BRAF V600E mutations. Gaining a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of BRAF inhibitor resistance, balancing toxicity and efficacy with novel trial designs are warranted.
BRAF联合MEK抑制疗法已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗BRAF V600E突变的实体瘤,但结直肠癌除外。然而,除了MAPK介导的耐药性之外,还存在其他几种耐药机制,如CRAF、ARAF、MET的激活以及P13K/AKT/mTOR通路,此外还有其他复杂通路。在VEM-PLUS研究中,我们对四项一期研究进行了汇总分析,评估维莫非尼单药治疗以及维莫非尼联合靶向治疗(索拉非尼、克唑替尼或依维莫司)或卡铂加紫杉醇治疗携带BRAF V600突变的晚期实体瘤的安全性和疗效。当将维莫非尼单药治疗与联合治疗方案进行比较时,未观察到总生存期(OS)或无进展生存期(PFS)有显著差异,但在维莫非尼与紫杉醇及卡铂的试验中OS较差(P = 0.011;风险比[HR],2.4;95%置信区间[CI],1.22 - 4.7)以及在交叉患者中也是如此(P = 0.0025;HR,2.089;95% CI,1.2 - 3.4)。与BRAF治疗难治组相比,既往未使用过BRAF抑制剂的患者12.6个月时的OS有统计学显著改善,BRAF治疗难治组为10.4个月(P = 0.024;HR,1.69;95% CI 1.07 - 2.68)。两组之间的中位PFS有统计学显著差异,未接受过BRAF治疗的组为7个月,而BRAF治疗难治组为4.7个月(P = 0.016;HR,1.80;95% CI 1.11 - 2.91)。维莫非尼单药治疗试验中确认的客观缓解率(ORR)(28%)高于联合治疗试验。我们的研究结果表明,与维莫非尼单药治疗相比,维莫非尼与细胞毒性化疗或与靶向RAF或mTOR的药物联合使用并不能显著延长携带BRAF V600E突变实体瘤患者的OS或PFS。有必要更好地了解BRAF抑制剂耐药的分子机制,通过新颖的试验设计来平衡毒性和疗效。