• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析 Nix-TB 试验的动态疗效终点。

Analysis of Dynamic Efficacy Endpoints of the Nix-TB Trial.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.

UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 8;76(11):1903-1910. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad051.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciad051
PMID:36804834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10249992/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safer, better, and shorter treatments for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) are an urgent global health need. The phase 3 clinical trial Nix-TB (NCT02333799) tested a 6-month treatment of MDR and XDR-TB consisting of high-dose linezolid, bedaquiline, and pretomanid (BPaL). In this study, we investigate the relationship between the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drugs, patient characteristics and efficacy endpoints from Nix-TB.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic data were collected at weeks 2, 8, and 16. Efficacy endpoints including treatment outcomes, time to stable culture conversion, and longitudinal time to positivity in the mycobacterial growth indicator tube assay were each characterized using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Relationships between patient, treatment pharmacokinetics, and disease characteristics and efficacy endpoints were evaluated.

RESULTS

Data from 93 (85% of the total) participants were analyzed. Higher body mass index was associated with a lower incidence of unfavorable treatment outcomes. Median time to stable culture conversion was 3 months in patients with lower baseline burden compared with 4.5 months in patients with high baseline burden. Participants with minimal disease had steeper time to positivity trajectories compared with participants with high-risk phenotypes. No relationship between any drugs' pharmacokinetics (drug concentration or exposure metrics) and any efficacy outcomes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We have successfully described efficacy endpoints of a BPaL regimen from the Nix-TB trial. Participants with high-risk phenotypes significantly delayed time to culture conversion and bacterial clearance. The lack of a relationship between pharmacokinetic exposures and pharmacodynamic biomarkers opens the possibility to use lower, safer doses, particularly for toxicity-prone linezolid.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02333799.

摘要

背景

对于耐多药(MDR)和广泛耐药(XDR)结核病(TB),更安全、更有效和疗程更短的治疗方法是全球迫切需要的。3 期临床试验 Nix-TB(NCT02333799)测试了一种 6 个月的 MDR 和 XDR-TB 治疗方案,该方案由高剂量利奈唑胺、贝达喹啉和普托马尼(BPaL)组成。在这项研究中,我们调查了 Nix-TB 中药物的药代动力学特征、患者特征和疗效终点之间的关系。

方法

在第 2、8 和 16 周收集药代动力学数据。疗效终点包括治疗结果、稳定培养物转化的时间和分枝杆菌生长指示剂管测定中的纵向阳性时间,每个终点都用非线性混合效应模型进行描述。评估了患者、治疗药代动力学、疾病特征与疗效终点之间的关系。

结果

对 93 名(总人数的 85%)参与者的数据进行了分析。较高的体重指数与不良治疗结果的发生率较低有关。与基线负担较高的患者相比,基线负担较低的患者稳定培养物转化的中位时间为 3 个月,而基线负担较高的患者为 4.5 个月。疾病负担较小的患者与高危表型的患者相比,时间到阳性的轨迹更陡峭。未观察到任何药物的药代动力学(药物浓度或暴露指标)与任何疗效结果之间存在关系。

结论

我们成功地描述了 Nix-TB 试验中 BPaL 方案的疗效终点。高危表型的患者显著延迟了培养物转化和细菌清除的时间。药代动力学暴露与药效动力学生物标志物之间缺乏关系为使用更低、更安全的剂量提供了可能性,特别是对于毒性倾向的利奈唑胺。

临床试验注册

NCT02333799。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/56943cd8ec88/ciad051f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/fd2258794106/ciad051f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/3c5cafeaca21/ciad051f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/13c5e8aa0007/ciad051f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/56943cd8ec88/ciad051f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/fd2258794106/ciad051f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/3c5cafeaca21/ciad051f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/13c5e8aa0007/ciad051f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d467/10249992/56943cd8ec88/ciad051f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of Dynamic Efficacy Endpoints of the Nix-TB Trial.分析 Nix-TB 试验的动态疗效终点。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 8;76(11):1903-1910. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad051.
2
Sterile tuberculous granuloma in a patient with XDR-TB treated with bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid.耐多药结核分枝杆菌感染患者经贝达喹啉、德拉马尼和利奈唑胺治疗后出现无菌性结核性肉芽肿。
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Dec 7;14(12):e245612. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245612.
3
Pretomanid with bedaquiline and linezolid for drug-resistant TB: a comparison of prospective cohorts.贝达喹啉和利奈唑胺联合普托马尼治疗耐药结核病的前瞻性队列比较。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2021 Jun 1;25(6):453-460. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.21.0035.
4
Availability of drugs and resistance testing for bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaL(M)) regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Europe.在欧洲,利福平耐药结核病的贝达喹啉、普托马尼德、利奈唑胺和莫西沙星(BPaL(M))方案的药物供应和耐药检测情况。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Sep;30(9):1197.e1-1197.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Novel 6-Month Treatment for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, United States.新型耐药结核病 6 个月疗程,美国。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):332-4. doi: 10.3201/eid2701.203766. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, Georgia and the Philippines.贝达喹啉、普托马尼德和利奈唑胺治疗南非、格鲁吉亚和菲律宾广泛耐药结核病的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e051521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051521.
7
Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.贝达喹啉-普托马尼德-利奈唑胺方案治疗耐药结核病。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 1;387(9):810-823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119430.
8
The Safety and Tolerability of Linezolid in Novel Short-Course Regimens Containing Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid to Treat Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.贝达喹啉、普托马尼和利奈唑胺新短程方案治疗利福平耐药结核病的安全性和耐受性:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 20;78(3):730-741. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad653.
9
A Modified BPaL Regimen for Tuberculosis Treatment replaces Linezolid with Inhaled Spectinamides.一种用于结核病治疗的改良BPaL方案用吸入性氨甲环酸酰胺替代了利奈唑胺。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 11:2023.11.16.567434. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.16.567434.
10
Superior Efficacy of a TBI-166, Bedaquiline, and Pyrazinamide Combination Regimen in a Murine Model of Tuberculosis.TBI-166、贝达喹啉和吡嗪酰胺联合方案在结核分枝杆菌感染小鼠模型中的高效性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Sep 20;66(9):e0065822. doi: 10.1128/aac.00658-22. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Era in Tuberculosis Prevention and Treatment: Breakthroughs in Drug Development and Future Prospects.结核病预防与治疗的新时代:药物研发的突破与未来前景
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01221-3.
2
Updates on the Treatment of Drug-Susceptible and Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.药物敏感和耐药结核病治疗的最新进展:美国胸科学会/美国疾病控制与预防中心/欧洲呼吸学会/美国感染病学会官方临床实践指南
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jan;211(1):15-33. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202410-2096ST.
3
Safety and Tolerability of Contezolid Versus Linezolid for Short-Term Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Randomized Controlled Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.贝达喹啉-普托马尼德-利奈唑胺方案治疗耐药结核病。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 1;387(9):810-823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119430.
2
Proposed Linezolid Dosing Strategies to Minimize Adverse Events for Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.利奈唑胺治疗广泛耐药结核病的不良事件最小化的推荐剂量策略。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 30;74(10):1736-1747. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab699.
3
Precision-Enhancing Risk Stratification Tools for Selecting Optimal Treatment Durations in Tuberculosis Clinical Trials.
康替唑胺与利奈唑胺用于耐利福平肺结核短期治疗的安全性和耐受性:一项随机对照研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Jul 4;18:3307-3315. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S516991. eCollection 2025.
4
Recent advancements in tuberculosis (TB) treatment regimens.结核病(TB)治疗方案的最新进展。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Feb;14(2):521-525. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1237_24. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
5
Update in tuberculosis treatment: a scoping review of current practices.结核病治疗的最新进展:当前实践的范围综述
Breathe (Sheff). 2025 Mar 18;21(1):240232. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0232-2024. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
A pharmacometric multistate model for predicting long-term treatment outcomes of patients with pulmonary TB.一种用于预测肺结核患者长期治疗结局的药物代谢动力学多状态模型。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Oct 1;79(10):2561-2569. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae256.
7
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tuberculosis time to positivity and colony-forming unit to assess the response to dose-ranging linezolid.结核分枝杆菌阳性时间和集落形成单位的药代动力学-药效学建模,以评估不同剂量利奈唑胺的反应。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Aug 7;68(8):e0019024. doi: 10.1128/aac.00190-24. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
8
Estimating Post-treatment Recurrence After Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Among Patients With and Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus: The Impact of Assumptions About Death and Missing Follow-up.估计感染和未感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的耐多药结核病患者治疗后的复发情况:关于死亡和失访假设的影响
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 25;78(1):164-171. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad589.
9
The Safety and Efficacy of Prolonged Use of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Patients with Pulmonary Multi-Drug Resistant/Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Prospective, Cohort Study in China.长期使用贝达喹啉治疗肺部耐多药/利福平耐药结核病患者的安全性和有效性:一项在中国进行的前瞻性队列研究。
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Aug 7;16:5055-5064. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S419996. eCollection 2023.
精准增强风险分层工具在结核病临床试验中选择最佳治疗持续时间的应用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;204(9):1086-1096. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202101-0117OC.
4
Acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of stakeholders implementing the novel BPaL regimen to treat extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients.接受度、可行性和利益相关者实施新型 BPaL 方案治疗广泛耐药结核病患者的可能性。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11427-y.
5
Baseline Xpert MTB/RIF ct values predict sputum conversion during the intensive phase of anti-TB treatment in HIV infected patients in Kampala, Uganda: a retrospective study.乌干达坎帕拉地区感染 HIV 的患者在抗结核治疗强化期内,基线 Xpert MTB/RIF ct 值可预测痰培养阴转:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;21(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06220-6.
6
An Exposure-Response Perspective on the Clinical Dose of Pretomanid.暴露-反应视角下的普托马尼临床剂量。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Dec 16;65(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01121-20.
7
Tuberculosis bacillary load, an early marker of disease severity: the utility of tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay.结核分枝杆菌载量,疾病严重程度的早期标志物:结核分子细菌载量测定的应用。
Thorax. 2020 Jul;75(7):606-608. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214238. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis.耐多药肺结核的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):893-902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901814.
9
Long-Term Effects on QT Prolongation of Pretomanid Alone and in Combinations in Patients with Tuberculosis.利奈唑胺单药及联合治疗对结核病患者 QT 间期延长的长期影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Sep 23;63(10). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00445-19. Print 2019 Oct.
10
Linezolid Pharmacokinetics in South African Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis and a High Prevalence of HIV Coinfection.利奈唑胺在南非耐药结核病合并高发 HIV 合并感染患者中的药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Feb 26;63(3). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02164-18. Print 2019 Mar.