• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持弱势家庭的膳食实践:零售商和社会组织实施的全国性干预措施的过程评估。

Supporting vulnerable families' meal practices: process evaluation of a nationwide intervention implemented by a retailer and social organizations.

机构信息

Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Unit Health Promotion, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3060. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20488-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20488-8
PMID:39506698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539700/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with poorer dietary habits and fewer family meals. Therefore, initiatives to empower families with a lower SES to adopt healthier meal practices are employed. The objective of this study was to evaluate a nationwide intervention "Dinner is served at 1-2-3 euros", developed by a Belgian retailer in collaboration with social organizations. It targets families with a lower SES and aims to promote more balanced and freshly cooked meals by providing recipe booklets of affordable meals at a guaranteed price of 1, 2, or 3 euros per portion. The process evaluation aimed to gain insight into the implementation process (Reach, Recruitment, Dose-delivered, Context), the satisfaction with the intervention (Dose-received), and the perceived impact of intervention participation.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study combining qualitative (i.e., focus groups and individual interviews) and quantitative research (i.e., surveys) was conducted. An interview with the retailer (n = 1), three focus group interviews with the involved social organizations (n = 15), and interviews with participants of "Dinner is served at 1-2-3 euros" (n = 26) were carried out, as well as surveys among these social organizations and participants.

RESULTS

Social organizations were generally satisfied with the project and appreciated the collaboration with the retailer. The main barrier to implement the project was a lack of time to help participants subscribing. Participants appreciated the inspiration from the recipe booklets, and the recipes' ease of preparation, their healthiness, and the variety. However, the recipes were sometimes deemed too exotic for participants' children. Participants also appreciated the budget friendliness, although the price guarantee mechanism of 1, 2 or 3 euros per portion was not always clear. Positive effects were mentioned in areas such as perceived healthy cooking and eating, improved cooking skills and ideas, and reduced financial concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, participants and social organizations were satisfied with the delivery and implementation of the intervention. Participants also noted some positive effects on their meal practices. Future research should provide insight into the intervention's effectiveness and impact on the healthiness of participants' dietary choices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was pre‑registered prior to data collection at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05595551-27/10/2022).

摘要

背景

较低的社会经济地位(SES)与较差的饮食习惯和较少的家庭用餐有关。因此,采取了一些举措来增强 SES 较低的家庭采用更健康的饮食方式。本研究的目的是评估一项由比利时零售商与社会组织合作发起的全国性干预措施“Dinner is served at 1-2-3 euros”,该措施针对 SES 较低的家庭,旨在通过提供价格为每道菜 1、2 或 3 欧元的经济实惠食谱,促进更均衡和新鲜的烹饪。过程评估旨在深入了解实施过程(范围、招募、剂量提供、背景)、对干预的满意度(剂量接受)以及干预参与的感知影响。

方法

采用定性(即焦点小组和个人访谈)和定量研究(即调查)相结合的混合方法研究。对零售商进行了一次访谈(n=1),对参与的社会组织进行了三次焦点小组访谈(n=15),对“Dinner is served at 1-2-3 euros”的参与者进行了访谈(n=26),并对这些社会组织和参与者进行了调查。

结果

社会组织对该项目普遍感到满意,并赞赏与零售商的合作。实施该项目的主要障碍是缺乏帮助参与者注册的时间。参与者欣赏食谱册的灵感,以及食谱的易于准备、健康和多样性。然而,对于参与者的孩子来说,一些食谱有时被认为过于异国情调。参与者还赞赏其价格实惠,尽管每道菜 1、2 或 3 欧元的价格保证机制并不总是明确。参与者还提到了一些积极影响,例如认为健康烹饪和饮食、提高烹饪技巧和创意以及减少财务担忧。

结论

总的来说,参与者和社会组织对干预措施的实施和交付感到满意。参与者还注意到他们的饮食方式有一些积极影响。未来的研究应该深入了解干预措施的有效性及其对参与者饮食健康选择的影响。

试验注册

在数据收集之前,研究方案已在 Clinicaltrials.gov 上预先注册(NCT05595551-27/10/2022)。

相似文献

1
Supporting vulnerable families' meal practices: process evaluation of a nationwide intervention implemented by a retailer and social organizations.支持弱势家庭的膳食实践:零售商和社会组织实施的全国性干预措施的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3060. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20488-8.
2
Evaluation of a national supermarket intervention supporting vulnerable families in healthy meal practices: a natural experiment.一项支持弱势家庭养成健康饮食习惯的全国性超市干预措施评估:一项自然实验。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04210-y.
3
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.
4
"The big win was that we actually cooked"- a qualitative interview study about the parental experience of Family Meals on Prescription for children living with obesity.“最大的收获是我们真的做饭了”——一项关于为肥胖儿童开具家庭用餐处方的家长体验的定性访谈研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 May 24;44(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00921-3.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a national supermarket intervention supporting vulnerable families in healthy meal practices: a natural experiment.一项支持弱势家庭养成健康饮食习惯的全国性超市干预措施评估:一项自然实验。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04210-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Determinants of Health: A Survey of Practices in Pediatric Weight Management Programs.儿童不良经历和健康社会决定因素评估:儿科体重管理项目实践调查。
Child Obes. 2024 Sep;20(6):425-433. doi: 10.1089/chi.2023.0152. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Exploring the Impact of Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Literacy on Adherence to Dietary Recommendations and Food Literacy.探讨社会人口特征和健康素养对饮食建议依从性和食品素养的影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 23;15(13):2853. doi: 10.3390/nu15132853.
3
Socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health and food consumption: the mediating roles of daily hassles and the perceived importance of health.社会经济不平等与自评健康和食物消费:日常困扰和对健康重视的中介作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15077-0.
4
Fifty shades of partnerships: a governance typology for public private engagement in the nutrition sector.五十种伙伴关系:营养部门公私合作的治理类型学
Global Health. 2023 Feb 21;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00912-1.
5
Associations Between Household Frequency of Cooking Dinner and Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Dietary Quality Among US Children and Adolescents.美国家庭儿童和青少年晚餐烹饪频率与超加工食品消费和饮食质量之间的关系。
Child Obes. 2024 Jan;20(1):11-22. doi: 10.1089/chi.2022.0200. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
6
Action on the social determinants for advancing health equity in the time of COVID-19: perspectives of actors engaged in a WHO Special Initiative.在 COVID-19 时代采取行动促进健康公平的社会决定因素:参与世卫组织特别倡议的行动者的观点。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 24;21(Suppl 3):193. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01798-y.
7
The Effect of Food Vouchers and an Educational Intervention on Promoting Healthy Eating in Vulnerable Families: A Pilot Study.食品券和教育干预对促进弱势家庭健康饮食的影响:一项试点研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 23;14(23):4980. doi: 10.3390/nu14234980.
8
Motives Driving Non-healthcare Community Organizations to Engage in Health Promotion Activities.推动非医疗保健社区组织参与健康促进活动的动机。
J Community Health. 2022 Oct;47(5):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01108-1. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy: an umbrella review protocol.跨部门和多部门方法在卫生政策中的应用:综述方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 15;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00826-1.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in the food environment and body composition among school-aged children: a fixed-effects analysis.学龄儿童食品环境与身体成分的社会经济不平等:固定效应分析。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Dec;45(12):2554-2561. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00934-y. Epub 2021 Aug 13.