State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, and College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
J Chem Phys. 2023 Feb 21;158(7):074103. doi: 10.1063/5.0137101.
Artificial intelligence-enhanced quantum mechanical method 1 (AIQM1) is a general-purpose method that was shown to achieve high accuracy for many applications with a speed close to its baseline semiempirical quantum mechanical (SQM) method ODM2*. Here, we evaluate the hitherto unknown performance of out-of-the-box AIQM1 without any refitting for reaction barrier heights on eight datasets, including a total of ∼24 thousand reactions. This evaluation shows that AIQM1's accuracy strongly depends on the type of transition state and ranges from excellent for rotation barriers to poor for, e.g., pericyclic reactions. AIQM1 clearly outperforms its baseline ODM2* method and, even more so, a popular universal potential, ANI-1ccx. Overall, however, AIQM1 accuracy largely remains similar to SQM methods (and B3LYP/6-31G* for most reaction types) suggesting that it is desirable to focus on improving AIQM1 performance for barrier heights in the future. We also show that the built-in uncertainty quantification helps in identifying confident predictions. The accuracy of confident AIQM1 predictions is approaching the level of popular density functional theory methods for most reaction types. Encouragingly, AIQM1 is rather robust for transition state optimizations, even for the type of reactions it struggles with the most. Single-point calculations with high-level methods on AIQM1-optimized geometries can be used to significantly improve barrier heights, which cannot be said for its baseline ODM2* method.
人工智能增强量子力学方法 1(AIQM1)是一种通用方法,已被证明在许多应用中具有接近其基线半经验量子力学(SQM)方法 ODM2的速度实现高精度。在这里,我们评估了 AIQM1 的未知性能,无需对 8 个数据集的反应势垒高度进行任何调整,这些数据集总共包含约 24000 个反应。该评估表明,AIQM1 的准确性强烈依赖于过渡态的类型,范围从旋转势垒的优异到例如周环反应的较差。AIQM1 明显优于其基线 ODM2方法,更重要的是,优于流行的通用势,ANI-1ccx。然而,总体而言,AIQM1 的准确性在很大程度上与 SQM 方法(以及对于大多数反应类型的 B3LYP/6-31G*)相似,这表明未来需要专注于提高 AIQM1 对势垒高度的性能。我们还表明,内置的不确定性量化有助于识别置信度预测。对于大多数反应类型,置信度高的 AIQM1 预测的准确性接近流行密度泛函理论方法的水平。令人鼓舞的是,即使对于 AIQM1 最难以处理的反应类型,它对过渡态优化也相当稳健。使用高级方法对 AIQM1 优化的几何形状进行单点计算可以显著提高势垒高度,而其基线 ODM2*方法则不能。