Jurić Petra, Dudley Dean A, Petocz Peter
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd., Macquarie Park New South Wales 2109, Australia.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb 4;32:102127. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102127. eCollection 2023 Apr.
The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a high intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention lasting 12 weeks on fitness (cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, muscular endurance, power, speed, flexibility, and balance) and adiposity of 10- to 15-year-old students implemented during their physical education (PE). The focus of this study was to compare two approaches to increasing fitness level among school-aged children, one approach focusing on regular PE sessions in accordance with the curriculum and another one on regular PE classes augmented by HIIT. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted (February-May 2022, Zagreb, Croatia). The total number of students across both groups was 207. General linear models were used to compare fitness and adiposity changes in both groups based on Eurofit test battery. A significant effect of the HIIT intervention was present for the 20-meter shuttle run test (p = 0.001; d = 0.31). The effect of the intervention compared to the control was estimated as an additional 181.2 m, 95 %CI (70.4 to 292.0). An additional intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed that the effect of the HIIT intervention on 20-meter shuttle run test remained statistically significant (p = 0.011), though the magnitude of the estimated effect was reduced from 181.2 m; SE = 55.4 to 119.6 m; SE = 46.4. Whilst it appears HIIT had the opposite of the expected effect on body fat percentiles, the effect on body composition was inconsistent. The intervention is registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) [ACTRN12622000209796].
本研究的目的是确定在10至15岁学生的体育课中实施的为期12周的高强度间歇训练(HIIT)干预对其体能(心肺适能、肌肉力量、肌肉耐力、功率、速度、柔韧性和平衡能力)及肥胖状况的影响。本研究的重点是比较两种提高学龄儿童体能水平的方法,一种方法是按照课程安排进行常规体育课,另一种方法是在常规体育课基础上增加HIIT。进行了一项整群随机对照试验(2022年2月至5月,克罗地亚萨格勒布)。两组学生总数为207名。基于欧洲体适能测试组合,使用一般线性模型比较两组的体能和肥胖变化情况。HIIT干预对20米穿梭跑测试有显著效果(p = 0.001;d = 0.31)。与对照组相比,干预的效果估计为额外多跑181.2米,95%置信区间为(70.4至292.0)。另一项意向性分析显示,HIIT干预对20米穿梭跑测试的效果在统计学上仍具有显著性(p = 0.011),尽管估计效果的幅度从181.2米;标准误 = 55.4降至119.6米;标准误 = 46.4。虽然HIIT对体脂百分位数的影响似乎与预期相反,但对身体成分的影响并不一致。该干预已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)注册[ACTRN12622000209796]。