• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于活检前mp-MRI检查发现的PI-RADS 1、2或3类病变,前列腺活检可以安全推迟吗?

Can a prostate biopsy be safely deferred on PI-RADS 1,2 or 3 lesions seen on pre-biopsy mp-MRI?

作者信息

Abdul Raheem Rickaz, Razzaq Ahsen, Beraud Victoria, Menzies-Wilson Richard, Odeh Rakan, Ibiok Imoh, Mulawkar Prashant, Andrews Henry, Anjum Iqbal, Hosny Khaled, Leslie Tom

机构信息

Speciality Doctor in Urology, Milton Keynes University Hospital, UK.

University of Buckingham Medical School.

出版信息

Arab J Urol. 2022 Sep 13;21(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2119711. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2022.2119711
PMID:36818375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9930831/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) is currently used to triage patients with suspected prostate cancer, before deciding on prostate biopsies. In our study, we evaluated normal and equivocal pre-biopsy mp-MRIs to see whether it is safe to avoid biopsy with such findings.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a district general hospital in the UK between August 2017 and July 2018. Patients with negative and equivocal prebiopsy mp-MRI with high clinical suspicion of cancer had proceeded to biopsy. MRI reports with prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scores 1, 2, 3 and normal MRI were evaluated against the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) outcomes to demonstrate benign pathology, clinically insignificant or clinically significant cancer (csCa). CsCa was defined as Gleason score (GS) ≥3 + 4.

RESULTS

Out of 265 mp-MRIs studied, five (1.9%) were PI-RADS 1, 109 (41.1%) and 84 (31.7%) were PI-RADS 2 and 3 lesions respectively; 67 (25.3%) were reported as normal. Seventy-five (27.3%) patients did not have biopsies following their MRI and 73.3% (51/75) of them had benign feeling prostate. Negative MRIs (PI-RADS 1, 2 and normal MRI) showed 8.8% and PI-RADS 3 lesions demonstrated 11.9% csCa. Negative predictive value for normal MRI was 91.2%. Mean PSA density (PSAD) among the benign, GS 3 + 3 and csCa was 0.14, 0.16 and 0.27 ng/ml/ml respectively and this was statistically significant ( < 0.001). The average percentage of cancer found in GS 3 + 3 and csCa was 3.2% and 20.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Avoiding TRUS-PB following normal or equivocal mp-MRI should carefully be decided as 18.5% of cancer was demonstrated in this group and 9.8% of those who were diagnosed with cancer were csCa. PSAD and DRE findings provide additional information to help with this decision.

摘要

引言

在决定是否进行前列腺活检之前,多参数磁共振成像(mp-MRI)目前用于对疑似前列腺癌患者进行分类。在我们的研究中,我们评估了活检前正常和可疑的mp-MRI,以确定对于此类检查结果避免活检是否安全。

方法

2017年8月至2018年7月在英国一家地区综合医院进行了一项回顾性研究。临床高度怀疑患有癌症但活检前mp-MRI结果为阴性和可疑的患者进行了活检。将前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分为1、2、3的MRI报告以及正常MRI与经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检(TRUS-PB)结果进行对照,以证明为良性病变、临床意义不显著或临床意义显著的癌症(csCa)。csCa定义为 Gleason评分(GS)≥3 + 4。

结果

在研究的265例mp-MRI中,5例(1.9%)为PI-RADS 1,109例(41.1%)和84例(31.7%)分别为PI-RADS 2和3级病变;67例(25.3%)报告为正常。75例(27.3%)患者在MRI检查后未进行活检,其中73.3%(51/75)的患者前列腺质地柔软。阴性MRI(PI-RADS 1、2和正常MRI)显示csCa的比例为8.8%,PI-RADS 3级病变显示csCa的比例为11.9%。正常MRI的阴性预测值为91.2%。良性、GS 3 + 3和csCa患者的平均前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)分别为0.14、0.16和0.27 ng/ml/ml,差异具有统计学意义(<0.001)。GS 3 + 3和csCa患者中发现癌症的平均百分比分别为3.2%和20.1%。

结论

对于正常或可疑的mp-MRI后避免进行TRUS-PB应谨慎决定,因为该组中有18.5%的患者被证实患有癌症,其中9.8%被诊断为癌症的患者为csCa。PSAD和直肠指检结果为这一决定提供了额外的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee1/9930831/c410a9fa2ee2/TAJU_A_2119711_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee1/9930831/e7d817a88e6d/TAJU_A_2119711_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee1/9930831/c410a9fa2ee2/TAJU_A_2119711_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee1/9930831/e7d817a88e6d/TAJU_A_2119711_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee1/9930831/c410a9fa2ee2/TAJU_A_2119711_F0003_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Can a prostate biopsy be safely deferred on PI-RADS 1,2 or 3 lesions seen on pre-biopsy mp-MRI?对于活检前mp-MRI检查发现的PI-RADS 1、2或3类病变,前列腺活检可以安全推迟吗?
Arab J Urol. 2022 Sep 13;21(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2119711. eCollection 2023.
2
Performance of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging through PIRADS scoring system in biopsy naïve patients with suspicious prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像通过PIRADS评分系统在未经活检的疑似前列腺癌患者中的表现。
Arab J Urol. 2022 Apr 24;20(3):121-125. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2067615. eCollection 2022.
3
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
4
Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度相结合可预测初次接受前列腺穿刺活检患者的活检结果。
BJU Int. 2017 Feb;119(2):225-233. doi: 10.1111/bju.13465. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据前列腺影像报告和数据系统,对PSA≥4 ng/mL患者进行磁共振成像靶向活检与经直肠超声引导活检的前列腺癌检出率比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Dec;8(6):741-753. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.03.
6
Assessment of elastographic Q-analysis score combined with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) fusion-guided biopsy in differentiating benign and malignant prostate.基于经直肠超声(TRUS)/多参数磁共振成像(MP-MRI)融合引导活检的弹性成像Q分析评分联合前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)在鉴别前列腺良恶性中的应用评估
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jul;12(7):3569-3579. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-932.
7
Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.联合超声/磁共振多参数融合引导活检与系统性超声活检获得的组织学结果分析:磁共振多参数成像在前列腺癌检测及假阴性中的作用
Radiol Med. 2018 Feb;123(2):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0814-y. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
9
The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?多参数磁共振成像在主动监测方案纳入患者随访中的应用。PSA 密度能否区分不同再分类风险的患者?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Dec;18(6):e698-e704. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 4.
10
Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原密度的风险分层,可能会减少接受低风险前列腺癌主动监测的男性不必要的后续活检程序。
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Machine Learning Prediction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Correlate with Target Prostate Biopsy Results?磁共振成像前列腺影像报告和数据系统的机器学习预测与目标前列腺活检结果相关吗?
Med Princ Pract. 2025 May 26:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000546509.
2
Development of novel nomograms for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS ≤ 3 lesions.用于预测PSA<10 ng/ml且PI-RADS≤3类病变的未接受活检患者前列腺癌的新型列线图的开发。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;14:1500010. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1500010. eCollection 2024.
3
Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
2
Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer?哪些磁共振成像阴性的前列腺癌患者可以安全避免活检?
J Urol. 2019 Feb;201(2):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.046.
3
Which scores need a core? An evaluation of MR-targeted biopsy yield by PIRADS score across different biopsy indications.
磁共振成像阴性不能用于省略初次前列腺活检——一项前后瞻性研究。
Prostate Int. 2024 Sep;12(3):128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
4
Utility of quantitative measurement of T using restriction spectrum imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.使用限制光谱成像对T进行定量测量在检测具有临床意义的前列腺癌中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82742-8.
5
New insights into molecular signaling pathways and current advancements in prostate cancer diagnostics & therapeutics.前列腺癌诊断与治疗中分子信号通路的新见解及当前进展。
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 17;13:1193736. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1193736. eCollection 2023.
哪些评分需要核心?不同活检指征下 PIRADS 评分对 MR 靶向活检效能的评估。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Nov;21(4):573-578. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0065-6. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
Cognitive-Targeted versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Detection.认知靶向与磁共振成像引导的前列腺活检在前列腺癌检测中的应用比较
Curr Urol. 2018 Jun;11(4):182-188. doi: 10.1159/000447216. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
5
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prior to First Prostate Biopsy-Are we there yet?首次前列腺活检前的磁共振成像——我们做到了吗?
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):409-410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
6
Validation of PI-RADS Version 2 in Transition Zone Lesions for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.PI-RADS 版本 2 在检测前列腺癌的移行区病变中的验证。
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):485-491. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170425. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.1.5T与3.0T磁共振成像对前列腺的检查:图像质量的前瞻性对比研究
Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.044. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
9
Assessing the validity of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoring system in diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.评估前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS v2)评分系统在诊断外周带前列腺癌中的有效性。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2017 Mar 21;4:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2017.02.001. eCollection 2017.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.多参数 MRI 和 TRUS 活检在前列腺癌(PROMIS)中的诊断准确性:一项配对验证性研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.