• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全踝关节置换术在线信息的可读性与质量

Readability and quality of online information on total ankle arthroplasty.

作者信息

Hartnett Davis A, Philips Alexander P, Daniels Alan H, Blankenhorn Brad D

机构信息

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, East Providence, RI 02914, USA.

出版信息

Foot (Edinb). 2023 Mar;54:101985. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101985. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2023.101985
PMID:36827889
Abstract

The internet is a frequently utilized resource to acquire health information. This study aims to examine the readability and quality of online information pertaining to total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). "Ankle arthroplasty" OR "ankle replacement" was queried in three search engines, with the first 3 pages of results identified. The readability of sites was calculated using six readability algorithms: Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog, SMOG, Coleman-Liau index, and Automated Readability Index. Quality was assessed using the JAMA benchmark, Global Quality Score (GQS), and DISCERN instrument. A total of 62 relevant sites were analyzed. Sources were primarily physician-sponsored (50%) or academic (31%) websites. The mean readability indices were above the recommended sixth grade reading level, with an average grade level of across scoring tools of 13.22 ± 2.07. No sites were at or below a sixth grade reading level. Quality ratings were subpar across assessment tools: JAMA = 1.9 ± 1.0 (range, 1-4) out of 4; GQS = 3.4 ± 1.0 (range, 1-5) out of 5. DISCERN = 54.0 ± 11.2 (range, 31-75) out of 80. The readability and quality of online information regarding ankle arthroplasty is not optimal for the average patient, with improvement valuable in cultivating shared decision-making.

摘要

互联网是获取健康信息时经常使用的资源。本研究旨在检验有关全踝关节置换术(TAA)的在线信息的可读性和质量。在三个搜索引擎中查询了“踝关节置换术”或“踝关节置换”,并确定了结果的前3页。使用六种可读性算法计算网站的可读性:弗莱什-金凯德年级水平、弗莱什阅读简易度、冈宁雾度、烟雾指数、科尔曼-廖指数和自动可读性指数。使用《美国医学会杂志》基准、全球质量评分(GQS)和辨别工具评估质量。共分析了62个相关网站。来源主要是医生赞助的网站(50%)或学术网站(31%)。平均可读性指数高于推荐的六年级阅读水平,所有评分工具的平均年级水平为13.22±2.07。没有网站达到或低于六年级阅读水平。在所有评估工具中,质量评级都低于标准:《美国医学会杂志》评分为1.9±1.0(范围为1-4),满分4分;GQS评分为3.4±1.0(范围为1-5),满分5分。辨别工具评分为54.0±11.2(范围为31-75),满分80分。关于踝关节置换术的在线信息的可读性和质量对于普通患者来说并不理想,改进对于培养共同决策很有价值。

相似文献

1
Readability and quality of online information on total ankle arthroplasty.全踝关节置换术在线信息的可读性与质量
Foot (Edinb). 2023 Mar;54:101985. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101985. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
2
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.踝关节融合术:互联网上与踝关节融合术相关的信息的质量和可读性。
Surgeon. 2021 Dec;19(6):e507-e511. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.评估父母对儿童疼痛在线资源的理解程度。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38569. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038569.
6
Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Achilles Tendon Ruptures.评估关于跟腱断裂的在线信息的可读性。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2020 Dec;13(6):470-477. doi: 10.1177/1938640019888058. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.美国矫形外科医师学会患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00658.
8
Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.评估关于髋关节镜手术的在线信息的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2142-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.039. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
9
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.全膝关节置换术:在线患者教育资源的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):98-106.
10
Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.乳腺影像中心网站上在线患者教育资料的可读性与质量
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Oct;17(10):1245-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Lost in Translation: Preoperative Orthopaedic Education Materials Significantly Exceed Recommended Reading Levels.翻译失误:术前骨科教育材料的阅读水平显著超过推荐标准。
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Aug 7;10(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00143. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
MedReadMe: A Systematic Study for Fine-grained Sentence Readability in Medical Domain.MedReadMe:医学领域细粒度句子可读性的系统研究。
Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2024 Nov;2024:17293-17319. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.958.
3
Readability of Online Spanish Materials for Breast Reconstruction Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps.
使用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣进行乳房重建的在线西班牙语材料的可读性
Cureus. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):e64616. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64616. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Analysis of the Most Popular Online Ankle Fracture-Related Patient Education Materials.最受欢迎的在线踝关节骨折相关患者教育材料分析。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Apr 3;9(2):24730114241241310. doi: 10.1177/24730114241241310. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
From quality to clarity: evaluating the effectiveness of online ınformation related to septic arthritis.从质量到清晰度:评估与脓毒性关节炎相关的在线信息的有效性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 15;18(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04181-x.