Cao Xingqi, Yang Zhenqing, Li Xueqin, Chen Chen, Hoogendijk Emiel O, Zhang Jingyun, Yao Nengliang Aaron, Ma Lina, Zhang Yawei, Zhu Yong, Zhang Xuehong, Du Yuxian, Wang Xiaofeng, Wu Xifeng, Gill Thomas M, Liu Zuyun
Center for Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital and Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, The Key Laboratory of Intelligent Preventive Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Zhejiang, 310058, Hangzhou, China.
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health, National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100000, China.
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02774-1.
Comorbidities among cancer survivors remain a serious healthcare burden and require appropriate management. Using two widely used frailty indicators, this study aimed to evaluate whether frailty was associated with the incidence risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among long-term cancer survivors.
We included 13,388 long-term cancer survivors (diagnosed with cancer over 5 years before enrolment) free of CVD and 6101 long-term cancer survivors free of T2DM, at the time of recruitment (aged 40-69 years), from the UK Biobank. Frailty was assessed by the frailty phenotype (FP_Frailty, range: 0-5) and the frailty index (FI_Frailty, range: 0-1) at baseline. The incident CVD and T2DM were ascertained through linked hospital data and primary care data, respectively. The associations were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression models.
Compared with non-frail participants, those with pre-frailty (FP_Frailty [met 1-2 of the components]: hazard ratio [HR]=1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.32; FI_Frailty [0.10< FI ≤0.21]: HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.74) and frailty (FP_Frailty [met ≥3 of the components]: HR=2.12, 95% CI: 1.73, 2.60; FI_Frailty [FI >0.21]: HR=2.19, 95% CI: 1.85, 2.59) had a significantly higher risk of CVD in the multivariable-adjusted model. A similar association of FI_Frailty with the risk of incident T2DM was observed. We failed to find such an association for FP_Frailty. Notably, the very early stage of frailty (1 for FP_Frailty and 0.1-0.2 for FI_Frailty) was also positively associated with the risk of CVD and T2DM (FI_Frailty only). A series of sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.
Frailty, even in the very early stage, was positively associated with the incidence risk of CVD and T2DM among long-term cancer survivors, although discrepancies existed between frailty indicators. While the validation of these findings is required, they suggest that routine monitoring, prevention, and interventive programs of frailty among cancer survivors may help to prevent late comorbidities and, eventually, improve their quality of life. Especially, interventions are recommended to target those at an early stage of frailty when healthcare resources are limited.
癌症幸存者的合并症仍然是一项严重的医疗负担,需要适当的管理。本研究使用两个广泛应用的衰弱指标,旨在评估长期癌症幸存者中衰弱是否与心血管疾病(CVD)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)的发病风险相关。
我们从英国生物银行纳入了13388名无CVD的长期癌症幸存者(入组前5年以上被诊断为癌症)以及6101名入组时无T2DM的长期癌症幸存者(年龄40 - 69岁)。在基线时通过衰弱表型(FP_衰弱,范围:0 - 5)和衰弱指数(FI_衰弱,范围:0 - 1)评估衰弱情况。分别通过关联的医院数据和初级保健数据确定CVD和T2DM的发病情况。使用Cox比例风险回归模型检验相关性。
在多变量调整模型中,与非衰弱参与者相比,衰弱前期(FP_衰弱[满足1 - 2项标准]:风险比[HR]=1.18,95%置信区间[CI]:1.05,1.32;FI_衰弱[0.10 < FI ≤ 0.21]:HR = 1.51,95% CI:1.32,1.74)和衰弱(FP_衰弱[满足≥3项标准]:HR = 2.12,95% CI:1.73,2.60;FI_衰弱[FI > 0.21]:HR = 2.19,95% CI:1.85,2.59)的参与者患CVD的风险显著更高。观察到FI_衰弱与T2DM发病风险有类似关联。对于FP_衰弱,我们未发现此类关联。值得注意的是,衰弱的极早期阶段(FP_衰弱为1,FI_衰弱为0.1 - 0.2)也与CVD和T2DM的风险呈正相关(仅FI_衰弱)。一系列敏感性分析证实了研究结果的稳健性。
尽管衰弱指标之间存在差异,但衰弱,即使在极早期阶段,与长期癌症幸存者中CVD和T2DM的发病风险呈正相关。虽然这些发现需要验证,但它们表明对癌症幸存者衰弱进行常规监测、预防和干预项目可能有助于预防晚期合并症,并最终改善他们的生活质量。特别是,当医疗资源有限时,建议针对衰弱早期阶段的人群进行干预。