• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于实验性切口伤口细菌定量的湿拭子法与组织活检法的比较。

Comparison between moist swab and tissue biopsy methods for quantitation of bacteria in experimental incisional wounds.

作者信息

Bornside G H, Bornside B B

出版信息

J Trauma. 1979 Feb;19(2):103-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197902000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-197902000-00005
PMID:368348
Abstract

The relationship between tissue-associated and wound fluid-associated levels of bacteria in closed, healing experimental incisional wounds seeded with Escherichia coli was examined in 200 rats. Tissue specimens and moist swab specimens were taken simultaneously and cultured by a single plate serial dilution method. Colony counts of approximately 10(5) bacteria/gm of tissue were found to be equivalent to colony counts of 10(3) bacteria/ml of specimen obtained on a moist swab. Moist swab sampling of an incisional wound therefore offers a direct and simple method of ascertaining infection (defined by others as greater than 10(5) bacteria/gm of tissue). Moist swab sampling obviates the necessity of surgical manipulation of the patient and subsequent weighing and grinding of tissue in the laboratory.

摘要

在200只接种大肠杆菌的闭合性愈合实验性切口伤口的大鼠中,研究了组织相关细菌水平与伤口液相关细菌水平之间的关系。同时采集组织标本和湿拭子标本,并通过单平板连续稀释法进行培养。发现每克组织中约10⁵个细菌的菌落计数等同于在湿拭子上获得的每毫升标本中10³个细菌的菌落计数。因此,对切口伤口进行湿拭子采样提供了一种直接且简单的确定感染的方法(其他人定义为每克组织中细菌数大于10⁵)。湿拭子采样避免了对患者进行手术操作以及随后在实验室中对组织进行称重和研磨的必要性。

相似文献

1
Comparison between moist swab and tissue biopsy methods for quantitation of bacteria in experimental incisional wounds.用于实验性切口伤口细菌定量的湿拭子法与组织活检法的比较。
J Trauma. 1979 Feb;19(2):103-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197902000-00005.
2
A quantitative swab is a good non-invasive alternative to a quantitative biopsy for quantifying bacterial load in wounds healing by second intention in horses.对于量化马通过二期愈合的伤口中的细菌载量而言,定量拭子是定量活检的一种良好的非侵入性替代方法。
Vet J. 2017 Jul;225:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Sample procurement for cultures of infected wounds: a systematic review.感染伤口培养标本采集:一项系统综述
J Wound Care. 2016 Apr;25(4):S4-6, S8-10. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup4.S4.
4
A comparison of two culturing methods for chronic wounds.两种慢性伤口培养方法的比较。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1997 Apr;43(3):20-2, 24, 26 passim.
5
Comparison of two non-invasive methods of microbial analysis in surgery practice: incision swabbing and the indirect imprint technique.外科实践中两种微生物分析非侵入性方法的比较:切口拭子法和间接印记技术。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Dec;15(6):786-93. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.168.
6
Infected surface wound: an experimental model and a method for the quantitation of bacteria in infected tissues.感染性体表伤口:一种实验模型及感染组织中细菌定量方法
Appl Microbiol. 1972 Mar;23(3):509-14. doi: 10.1128/am.23.3.509-514.1972.
7
Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds.定量拭子培养与组织活检:慢性伤口中的比较
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001 Jan;47(1):34-7.
8
Comparison of bacteriologic culture results for skin wound swabs and skin wound biopsy specimens.皮肤伤口拭子和皮肤伤口活检标本的细菌培养结果比较。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021 Dec 15;259(12):1416-1421. doi: 10.2460/javma.20.10.0568.
9
Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.三种拭子转运系统用于需氧菌和厌氧菌直接释放与回收的比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Dec;62(4):471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
10
Quantification of bacteria in operation wounds--an experimental investigation with swab sampling in pigs.
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1980 Apr;88(2):71-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1980.tb02608.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Isolation and Identification of Some Bacteria Contemn in Burn Wounds in Misan, Iraq.伊拉克米桑地区烧伤创面分离鉴定的一些细菌。
Arch Razi Inst. 2021 Dec 30;76(6):1665-1670. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356367.1833. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
[Microbial stress of skin and wounds in clinical aspects and practice. Between search and destroy and monitor and relax].[临床视角与实践中皮肤及伤口的微生物应激。在“搜索与消灭”和“监测与放松”之间]
Hautarzt. 2014 Jan;65(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s00105-013-2634-x.
3
A rat model of diabetic wound infection for the evaluation of topical antimicrobial therapies.
一种用于评估局部抗菌治疗的糖尿病伤口感染大鼠模型。
Comp Med. 2012 Feb;62(1):37-48.
4
The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds.两种半定量创面拭子技术在鉴定感染性皮肤创面病原体中的临床疗效。
Int Wound J. 2011 Apr;8(2):176-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00765.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
5
Evaluation of the tissue toxicity of antiseptics by the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HETCAM).鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜(HETCAM)法评价消毒剂的组织毒性。
Eur J Med Res. 2010 May 18;15(5):204-9. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-5-204.
6
Development of an experimental model of infected skin ulcer.感染性皮肤溃疡实验模型的建立。
Int Wound J. 2004 Apr;1(1):49-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481x.2004.00006.x.
7
Burn wound infections.烧伤创面感染
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006 Apr;19(2):403-34. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006.
8
Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.伤口微生物学及相关的伤口处理方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):244-69. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001.
9
Microbiologic and clinical value of primary broth cultures of wound specimens collected with swabs.用拭子采集的伤口标本初代肉汤培养的微生物学和临床价值。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2003-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2003-2006.1997.