• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马粪便用于移植处理后的细菌组成及活力评估

Evaluation of Bacterial Composition and Viability of Equine Feces after Processing for Transplantation.

作者信息

Loublier Clémence, Taminiau Bernard, Heinen Julia, Lecoq Laureline, Amory Hélène, Daube Georges, Cesarini Carla

机构信息

Equine Clinical Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Bât. B41, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2023 Jan 17;11(2):231. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020231.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms11020231
PMID:36838196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9966902/
Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used empirically for decades in equine medicine to treat intestinal dysbiosis but evidence-based information is scarce. This in vitro study aimed at assessing the effect of a commonly used pre-FMT processing method on the bacterial composition and viability of the fecal filtrate. Three samples of fresh equine manure (T) were processed identically: the initial manure was mixed with 1 L of lukewarm water and chopped using an immersion blender to obtain a mixture (T), which was left uncovered during 30 min (T) and percolated through a sieve to obtain a fecal filtrate (T). Samples were taken throughout the procedure (Tn) and immediately stored at 4 °C until processing. The 16S rDNA amplicon profiling associated with propidium monoazide treatment was performed on each sample to select live bacteria. Analyses of α and β diversity and main bacterial populations and quantitative (qPCR) analysis were performed and statistically compared (significance < 0.05) between time points (T-T). No significant differences in ecological indices or mean estimated total living bacteria were found in the final fecal filtrate (T) in regard to the original manure (T); however, relative abundances of some minor genera (, WCHB1-41_ge and ) were significantly different in the final filtrate. In conclusion, the results support the viability of the major bacterial populations in equine feces when using the described pre-FMT protocol.

摘要

粪便微生物群移植(FMT)在马医学中经验性使用已有数十年,用于治疗肠道菌群失调,但基于证据的信息却很少。这项体外研究旨在评估一种常用的FMT前处理方法对粪便滤液细菌组成和活力的影响。对三份新鲜马粪样本(T)进行相同处理:将初始粪便与1升温水混合,并用浸入式搅拌机切碎以获得混合物(T),将其在30分钟内不覆盖放置(T),然后通过筛网过滤以获得粪便滤液(T)。在整个过程中采集样本(Tn),并立即在4°C下储存直至处理。对每个样本进行与单叠氮化丙锭处理相关的16S rDNA扩增子分析,以选择活细菌。进行α和β多样性分析、主要细菌种群分析以及定量(qPCR)分析,并在各时间点(T - T)之间进行统计学比较(显著性<0.05)。最终粪便滤液(T)与原始粪便(T)相比,在生态指数或平均估计总活菌数方面未发现显著差异;然而,最终滤液中一些次要属(如WCHB1 - 41_ge等)的相对丰度存在显著差异。总之,结果支持使用所述FMT前方案时马粪便中主要细菌种群的活力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/3b901140ca4b/microorganisms-11-00231-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/07a2a29de6dc/microorganisms-11-00231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/7f7a9d12ef44/microorganisms-11-00231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/b385c3d22bca/microorganisms-11-00231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/c64c449395b2/microorganisms-11-00231-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/3b901140ca4b/microorganisms-11-00231-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/07a2a29de6dc/microorganisms-11-00231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/7f7a9d12ef44/microorganisms-11-00231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/b385c3d22bca/microorganisms-11-00231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/c64c449395b2/microorganisms-11-00231-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b11/9966902/3b901140ca4b/microorganisms-11-00231-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Bacterial Composition and Viability of Equine Feces after Processing for Transplantation.马粪便用于移植处理后的细菌组成及活力评估
Microorganisms. 2023 Jan 17;11(2):231. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020231.
2
Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses.评估新鲜和冷冻粪便微生物群移植(FMT)产品中粪便细菌的活力和多样性。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Jul 10;20(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04166-w.
3
In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Storage at -20°C and Proximal Gastrointestinal Conditions on Viability of Equine Fecal Microbiota Transplant.-20°C储存及近端胃肠道条件对马粪便微生物群移植活力影响的体外评估
J Equine Vet Sci. 2021 Mar;98:103360. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103360. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
4
Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?粪便移植中细菌的存活情况:哪些细菌能够存活?
EBioMedicine. 2019 Mar;41:509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
5
Rapid regrowth and detection of microbial contaminants in equine fecal microbiome samples.马粪便微生物组样本中微生物污染物的快速再生与检测
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0187044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187044. eCollection 2017.
6
Simultaneous Daily Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Fails to Prevent Metronidazole-Induced Dysbiosis of Equine Gut Microbiota.每日同步粪便微生物群移植未能预防马肠道微生物群甲硝唑诱导的失调。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2022 Jul;114:104004. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104004. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
[Efficacy analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of 2010 patients with intestinal disorders].[粪便微生物群移植治疗2010例肠道疾病患者的疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 25;22(9):861-868. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.09.011.
8
Superiority of Higher-Volume Fresh Feces Compared to Lower-Volume Frozen Feces in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Colitis.高容量新鲜粪便优于低容量冷冻粪便在复发性艰难梭菌相关性结肠炎粪菌移植中的应用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jun;66(6):2000-2004. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06459-0. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
Complete Microbiota Engraftment Is Not Essential for Recovery from Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.完全微生物群植入对于粪便微生物群移植后复发性艰难梭菌感染的恢复并非必不可少。
mBio. 2016 Dec 20;7(6):e01965-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01965-16.
10
Optimisation of a propidium monoazide based method to determine the viability of microbes in faecal slurries for transplantation.优化基于碘化丙啶单叠氮化物的方法,以确定粪便混悬液中用于移植的微生物的活力。
J Microbiol Methods. 2019 Jan;156:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in bacterial viability after preparation and storage of fecal microbiota transplantation solution using equine feces.使用马粪便制备和储存粪便微生物群移植溶液后细菌活力的变化。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 20;13:e18860. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18860. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses.评估新鲜和冷冻粪便微生物群移植(FMT)产品中粪便细菌的活力和多样性。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Jul 10;20(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04166-w.
3
DNA from non-viable bacteria biases diversity estimates in the corals Acropora loripes and Pocillopora acuta.

本文引用的文献

1
Rumen sampling methods bias bacterial communities observed.瘤胃液取样方法会使观察到的细菌群落产生偏差。
PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0258176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258176. eCollection 2022.
2
Stool preparation under anaerobic conditions contributes to retention of obligate anaerobes: potential improvement for fecal microbiota transplantation.在厌氧条件下进行粪便准备有助于保留专性厌氧菌:改善粪便微生物群移植的潜力。
BMC Microbiol. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02325-9.
3
The Equine Faecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses and Ponies in The Netherlands: Impact of Host and Environmental Factors.
来自无法存活细菌的DNA会使鹿角珊瑚和尖锐小枝鹿角珊瑚的多样性估计产生偏差。
Environ Microbiome. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00541-6.
4
A Pilot Study to Detect Viable spp. in Diarrheal Stool Using Viability Real-Time PCR as a Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tool in a Clinical Setting.一项使用基于实时 PCR 的活病毒检测技术作为一种非培养依赖性诊断工具在临床环境中检测腹泻粪便中 spp. 的可行性研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 10;24(12):9979. doi: 10.3390/ijms24129979.
荷兰健康马匹和矮种马的粪便微生物群:宿主和环境因素的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 12;11(6):1762. doi: 10.3390/ani11061762.
4
Impact of Ambient Temperature Sample Storage on the Equine Fecal Microbiota.环境温度样本储存对马粪便微生物群的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 15;11(3):819. doi: 10.3390/ani11030819.
5
In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Storage at -20°C and Proximal Gastrointestinal Conditions on Viability of Equine Fecal Microbiota Transplant.-20°C储存及近端胃肠道条件对马粪便微生物群移植活力影响的体外评估
J Equine Vet Sci. 2021 Mar;98:103360. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103360. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
6
The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.马的肠道微生物群:马肠道微生物群的当前研究及未来展望。
Anim Microbiome. 2019 Nov 13;1(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s42523-019-0013-3.
7
Assessment of clinical and microbiota responses to fecal microbial transplantation in adult horses with diarrhea.评估粪便微生物移植对成年腹泻马的临床和微生物群反应。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0244381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244381. eCollection 2021.
8
Effect of oral administration of omeprazole on the microbiota of the gastric glandular mucosa and feces of healthy horses.奥美拉唑口服对健康马胃腺黏膜和粪便微生物群的影响。
J Vet Intern Med. 2020 Nov;34(6):2727-2737. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15937. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
9
Equine faecal microbiota transplant: Current knowledge, proposed guidelines and future directions.马粪便微生物群移植:当前知识、拟议指南及未来方向。
Equine Vet Educ. 2018 Mar;30(3):151-160. doi: 10.1111/eve.12559. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
10
Effect of an antimicrobial drug on lung microbiota in healthy dogs.一种抗菌药物对健康犬类肺部微生物群的影响。
Heliyon. 2019 Nov 14;5(11):e02802. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02802. eCollection 2019 Nov.