• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同类型乳酸菌对天然牧草青贮在厌氧发酵及有氧暴露过程中动态发酵品质和微生物群落的影响

Effects of Different Types of LAB on Dynamic Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of Native Grass Silage during Anaerobic Fermentation and Aerobic Exposure.

作者信息

Zhang Jiawei, Liu Yichao, Wang Zhijun, Bao Jian, Zhao Muqier, Si Qiang, Sun Pengbo, Ge Gentu, Jia Yushan

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.

Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 17;11(2):513. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020513.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms11020513
PMID:36838477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9965529/
Abstract

Silage of native grasses can alleviate seasonal forage supply imbalance in pastures and provide additional sources to meet forage demand. The study aimed to investigate the effects of (LP), (LB), and in combination with (PB) on the nutritional quality, fermentation quality, and microbial community of native grass silage at 2, 7, 15, and 60 days after ensiling and at 4 and 8 days after aerobic exposure. The results showed that dry matter content, crude protein content, the number of lactic acid bacteria, and lactic acid and acetic acid content increased and pH and ammonia nitrogen content decreased after lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculation compared with the control group (CK). LP had the lowest pH and highest lactic acid content but did not have greater aerobic stability. LB maintained a lower pH level and acetic acid remained at a higher level after aerobic exposure; aerobic bacteria, coliform bacteria, yeast, and molds all decreased in number, which effectively improved aerobic stability. The effect of the compound addition of LAB was in between the two other treatments, having higher crude protein content, lactic acid and acetic acid content, lower pH, and ammonia nitrogen content. At the phylum level, the dominant phylum changed from Proteobacteria to Firmicutes after ensiling, and at the genus level, and were the dominant genera in both LAB added groups, while was the dominant genus in the CK treatment. In conclusion, the addition of LAB can improve native grass silage quality by changing bacterial community structure. LP is beneficial to improve the fermentation quality in the ensiling stage, LB is beneficial to inhibit silage deterioration in the aerobic exposure stage, and compound LAB addition is more beneficial to be applied in native grass silage.

摘要

天然牧草青贮料可以缓解牧场季节性草料供应不平衡的问题,并提供额外的草料来源以满足草料需求。本研究旨在调查乳酸杆菌(LP)、芽孢杆菌(LB)以及乳酸杆菌与芽孢杆菌联合添加(PB)对天然牧草青贮料在青贮后2天、7天、15天和60天以及有氧暴露后4天和8天的营养品质、发酵品质和微生物群落的影响。结果表明,与对照组(CK)相比,接种乳酸菌(LAB)后,青贮料的干物质含量、粗蛋白含量、乳酸菌数量以及乳酸和乙酸含量增加,pH值和氨氮含量降低。LP的pH值最低,乳酸含量最高,但有氧稳定性不强。LB在有氧暴露后保持较低的pH值水平,乙酸含量较高;需氧菌、大肠菌群、酵母菌和霉菌数量均减少,有效提高了有氧稳定性。复合添加LAB的效果介于其他两种处理之间,粗蛋白含量、乳酸和乙酸含量较高,pH值和氨氮含量较低。在门水平上,青贮后优势门从变形菌门变为厚壁菌门;在属水平上,添加LAB的两个组中,乳杆菌属和芽孢杆菌属是优势属,而CK处理中肠杆菌属是优势属。综上所述,添加LAB可通过改变细菌群落结构来提高天然牧草青贮料品质。LP有利于提高青贮阶段的发酵品质,LB有利于抑制有氧暴露阶段青贮料的变质,复合添加LAB更有利于应用于天然牧草青贮料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/9965529/ca9a781e48c8/microorganisms-11-00513-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/9965529/de0b999f697d/microorganisms-11-00513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/9965529/aa8b885e1e99/microorganisms-11-00513-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/9965529/ca9a781e48c8/microorganisms-11-00513-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/9965529/de0b999f697d/microorganisms-11-00513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/9965529/aa8b885e1e99/microorganisms-11-00513-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/9965529/ca9a781e48c8/microorganisms-11-00513-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Different Types of LAB on Dynamic Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of Native Grass Silage during Anaerobic Fermentation and Aerobic Exposure.不同类型乳酸菌对天然牧草青贮在厌氧发酵及有氧暴露过程中动态发酵品质和微生物群落的影响
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 17;11(2):513. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020513.
2
Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on the nutrient composition, fermentation quality, and microbial diversity of whole-plant soybean-corn mixed silage.乳酸菌接种剂对全株大豆-玉米混合青贮饲料营养成分、发酵品质及微生物多样性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2024 Apr 15;15:1347293. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1347293. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluating the fermentation characteristics, bacterial community, and predicted functional profiles of native grass ensiled with different additives.评估添加不同添加剂青贮的天然草的发酵特性、细菌群落及预测功能概况。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 18;13:1025536. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1025536. eCollection 2022.
4
The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 or Lactobacillus plantarum MTD-1 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages ensiled at two dry matter contents.布氏乳杆菌40788或植物乳杆菌MTD-1对两种干物质含量青贮玉米青贮发酵及有氧稳定性的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Aug;92(8):3907-14. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1788.
5
Microbial Community and Fermentation Characteristics of Native Grass Prepared Without or With Isolated Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Mongolian Plateau.蒙古高原上不添加或添加分离乳酸菌制备的天然草料的微生物群落及发酵特性
Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 1;12:731770. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.731770. eCollection 2021.
6
Effect of sorbic acid and dual-purpose inoculants on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of high dry matter rice straw silage.山梨酸和两用接种剂对高干物质水稻秸秆青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 May;130(5):1456-1465. doi: 10.1111/jam.14882. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Effect of isolated lactic acid bacteria on the quality and bacterial diversity of native grass silage.分离乳酸菌对天然禾本科牧草青贮品质及细菌多样性的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 6;14:1160369. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1160369. eCollection 2023.
8
Community Synergy of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cleaner Fermentation of Oat Silage Prepared with a Multispecies Microbial Inoculant.多菌种微生物添加剂对燕麦青贮的协同发酵和清洁发酵。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0070523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00705-23. Epub 2023 May 11.
9
Effects of inoculation of and on fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and microbial community dynamics of wilted silage.接种[具体物质1]和[具体物质2]对萎蔫[青贮原料名称]青贮饲料发酵品质、好氧稳定性及微生物群落动态的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 29;13:928731. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.928731. eCollection 2022.
10
Fermentation weight loss, fermentation quality, and bacterial community of ensiling of sweet sorghum with lactic acid bacteria at different silo densities.不同青贮窖密度下添加乳酸菌对甜高粱青贮发酵失重、发酵品质及细菌群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Nov 14;13:1013913. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1013913. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Changes in Microorganisms and Metabolites During Silage Fermentation of Whole Winter Wheat.冬小麦全株青贮发酵过程中微生物和代谢产物的动态变化
Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 28;12(8):708. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12080708.
2
Effects of cellulase and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on silage performance, microbial community composition and volatiles of Caragana korshinskii.纤维素酶和植物乳杆菌对柠条锦鸡儿青贮性能、微生物群落组成及挥发性成分的影响
BMC Microbiol. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04116-y.
3
Improving fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and microbial community stabilization of triticale by essential oil.

本文引用的文献

1
Response of fermentation quality and microbial community of oat silage to homofermentative lactic acid bacteria inoculation.燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和微生物群落对同型发酵乳酸菌接种的响应
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 20;13:1091394. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1091394. eCollection 2022.
2
Fermentation of rose residue by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum B7 and Bacillus subtilis natto promotes polyphenol content and beneficial bioactivity.植物乳杆菌B7和纳豆芽孢杆菌对玫瑰残渣的发酵可提高多酚含量及有益生物活性。
J Biosci Bioeng. 2022 Dec;134(6):501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on the Quality, Volatile Chemicals and Microbial Community of Silage During Aerobic Exposure.
通过香精油提高小黑麦的发酵品质、好氧稳定性和微生物群落稳定性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e0130224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01302-24. Epub 2025 May 21.
4
Effects of ensiling period and lactic acid bacteria inoculation on aerobic stability of silage in forage infected with leaf spot disease.青贮期和乳酸菌接种对感染叶斑病的牧草青贮饲料有氧稳定性的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Apr 28;16:1548678. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1548678. eCollection 2025.
5
Effects of Mixing Ratio and Lactic Acid Bacteria Preparation on the Quality of Whole-Plant Quinoa and Whole-Plant Corn or Stevia Powder Mixed Silage.混合比例和乳酸菌制剂对全株藜麦与全株玉米或甜叶菊粉混合青贮品质的影响
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 3;13(1):78. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010078.
6
Fermentation quality, amino acids profile, and microbial communities of whole-plant soybean silage in response to B90 alone or in combination with functional microbes.单一使用B90或与功能性微生物联合使用时,全株大豆青贮饲料的发酵品质、氨基酸谱及微生物群落
Front Microbiol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1458287. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1458287. eCollection 2024.
7
Effects of kinds of additives on fermentation quality, nutrient content, aerobic stability, and microbial community of the mixed silage of king grass and rice straw.不同添加剂对皇竹草与稻草混合青贮饲料发酵品质、营养成分、有氧稳定性及微生物群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jun 12;15:1420022. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1420022. eCollection 2024.
8
Effects of selenium enrichment on fermentation characteristics, selenium content and microbial community of alfalfa silage.富硒对苜蓿青贮发酵特性、硒含量和微生物群落的影响。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05268-1.
9
Effects of Different Lactic Acid Bacteria in Single or Mixed Form on the Fermentative Parameters and Nutrient Contents of Early Heading Triticale Silage for Livestock.单一或混合形式的不同乳酸菌对用于家畜的早熟小黑麦青贮饲料发酵参数和营养成分的影响。
Foods. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):4296. doi: 10.3390/foods12234296.
10
Effects of Tannin Extract as an Additive on Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability, and Microbial Modulation of Maize Silage.单宁提取物作为添加剂对玉米青贮饲料发酵品质、有氧稳定性和微生物调控的影响
Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 14;11(11):2767. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112767.
乳酸菌添加剂对青贮饲料有氧暴露期间品质、挥发性化学物质及微生物群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Sep 2;13:938153. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.938153. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Cellulase and on the Fermentation Parameters, Nutrients, and Bacterial Community in Silage.纤维素酶对青贮饲料发酵参数、养分及细菌群落的影响。 你提供的原文中“and”后面似乎缺少内容,请你检查一下,确保翻译的准确性。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 7;13:926065. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.926065. eCollection 2022.
5
An innovative strategy to enhance the ensiling quality and methane production of excessively wilted wheat straw: Using acetic acid or hetero-fermentative lactic acid bacterial community as additives.一种提高过度萎蔫小麦秸秆青贮质量和甲烷产量的创新策略:使用乙酸或异型发酵乳酸菌群落作为添加剂。
Waste Manag. 2022 Jul 15;149:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Exploring the Effects of Different Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community and In Vitro Gas Production of Forage Oat Silage.探究不同细菌添加剂对饲用燕麦青贮发酵品质、微生物群落及体外产气的影响
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(9):1122. doi: 10.3390/ani12091122.
7
Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Molasses Additives on Dynamic Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of Native Grass Silage.乳酸菌和糖蜜添加剂对天然草料青贮动态发酵品质及微生物群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 16;13:830121. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.830121. eCollection 2022.
8
Effects of Cellulase and Lactobacillus plantarum on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition, and Microbial Community of Mixed Silage of Whole-Plant Corn and Peanut Vines.纤维素酶和植物乳杆菌对全株玉米和花生藤混合青贮发酵品质、化学成分和微生物群落的影响。
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2022 Jun;194(6):2465-2480. doi: 10.1007/s12010-022-03821-y. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
9
A comprehensive review on microbial production of 1,2-propanediol: micro-organisms, metabolic pathways, and metabolic engineering.1,2-丙二醇微生物生产的综合综述:微生物、代谢途径及代谢工程
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021 Nov 18;14(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-02067-w.
10
Silage fermentation characteristics and microbial diversity of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in response to exogenous microbiota from temperate grasses.苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)对外源温带禾草微生物组的青贮发酵特性及微生物多样性响应
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 22;37(12):204. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03155-7.