He Chao, Li Qian, Xiao Huaidong, Sun Xuchun, Gao Zepeng, Cai Yuan, Zhao Shengguo
College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Provincial R&D Institute of Ruminants in Gansu, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 3;13(1):78. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010078.
Quinoa is the only single plant that can meet all the nutritional needs of human, and its potential for feed utilization has been continuously explored, becoming a prosperous industry for poverty alleviation. In order to further tap the feeding value of whole quinoa, develop quinoa as a feed substitute for conventional crops such as corn, and improve its comprehensive utilization rate, this experiment analyzed the silage quality and mycotoxin content of mixed silage of whole-plant quinoa (WPQ) with whole-plant corn (WPC) or stevia powder(SP) in different proportions, and further improved the silage quality of mixed silage by using two lactic acid bacteria preparations (Sila-Max and Sila-Mix). The quality, microbial population, and mycotoxin levels of quinoa and corn silage, as well as that of the mixed silage of quinoa and stevia, were evaluated using single-factor analysis of variance. The impact of various lactic acid bacteria preparations on the quality of whole-quinoa and whole-corn mixed silage was investigated through two-factor analysis of variance. WPQ and WPC were mixed at the ratio of 5:5 (QB5), 6:4 (QB6), 7:3 (QB7), 8:2 (QB8), 9:1 (QB9) and 10:0 (QB10). SP was mixed with WPQ at the supplemental levels of 0.2% (QB10S2), 0.4% (QB10S4), 0.6% (QB10S6), 0.8% (QB10S8) and 1.0% (QB10S10). After 60 days of silage, the silage indexes, the number of harmful microorganisms, and the mycotoxin levels were measured, to explore the appropriate ratio of mixed silage. The membership function analysis showed that the quality of mixed silage of WPQ with SP was better, and the optimal addition amount of SP was 0.6%. The results of Max and Mix on the quality improvement test of WPQ with WPC mixed silage showed that the two lactic acid bacteria formulations increased CP and AA content, and reduced NH-N/TN; pH was significantly lower than the control group ( < 0.01), and LA was significantly higher than the control group ( < 0.01). The microbial count results showed that the addition of lactic acid bacteria preparation significantly reduced the number of molds and aerobic bacteria, and the effect of Mix was better than that of Max. When the mixing ratio was between QB7 and QB10, mold was not detected in the lactic-acid-bacteria preparation groups. Max and Mix significantly reduced the levels of mycotoxins, both of which were far below the range of feed safety testing, and 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that the silage microbiota varied with different mixing ratios and whether lactic acid bacteria preparations were used. Max and Mix increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes, with Mix having a more significant effect, especially in the QB6 (65.05%) and QB7 (63.61%) groups. The relative abundance of was significantly higher than that of the control group ( < 0.05). The relative abundance of and were negatively and positively correlated with the addition level of quinoa, respectively. Comprehensive analysis showed that adding 0.6% SP to the WPQ and using Mix in mixed silage of WPQ and WPC with the proportion of WPQ no less than 70% had the best silage effect, and was more beneficial to animal health.
藜麦是唯一能满足人类所有营养需求的单一植物,其饲料利用潜力不断被探索,成为一项繁荣的扶贫产业。为进一步挖掘全株藜麦的饲用价值,将藜麦开发为玉米等常规作物的饲料替代品,提高其综合利用率,本试验分析了全株藜麦(WPQ)与全株玉米(WPC)或甜叶菊粉(SP)不同比例混合青贮的青贮品质和霉菌毒素含量,并通过两种乳酸菌制剂(Sila-Max和Sila-Mix)进一步改善混合青贮的青贮品质。采用单因素方差分析对藜麦和玉米青贮以及藜麦与甜叶菊混合青贮的品质、微生物菌群和霉菌毒素水平进行评价。通过双因素方差分析研究各种乳酸菌制剂对全株藜麦与全株玉米混合青贮品质的影响。WPQ和WPC按5:5(QB5)、6:4(QB6)、7:3(QB7)、8:2(QB8)、9:1(QB9)和10:0(QB10)的比例混合。SP以0.2%(QB10S2)、0.4%(QB10S4)、0.6%(QB10S6)、0.8%(QB10S8)和1.0%(QB10S10)的添加水平与WPQ混合。青贮60天后,测定青贮指标、有害微生物数量和霉菌毒素水平,以探索适宜的混合青贮比例。隶属函数分析表明,WPQ与SP混合青贮品质较好,SP最佳添加量为0.6%。Max和Mix对WPQ与WPC混合青贮品质改良试验结果表明,两种乳酸菌制剂提高了粗蛋白(CP)和氨基酸(AA)含量,降低了氨态氮(NH-N)/总氮(TN);pH显著低于对照组(<0.01),乳酸(LA)显著高于对照组(<0.01)。微生物计数结果表明,添加乳酸菌制剂显著降低了霉菌和好氧菌数量,Mix的效果优于Max。当混合比例在QB7至QB10之间时,乳酸菌制剂组未检测到霉菌。Max和Mix显著降低了霉菌毒素水平,两者均远低于饲料安全检测范围,16S rRNA测序显示青贮微生物群随不同混合比例和是否使用乳酸菌制剂而变化。Max和Mix提高了厚壁菌门的相对丰度,Mix的效果更显著,尤其是在QB6(65.05%)和QB7(63.61%)组。其相对丰度显著高于对照组(<0.05)。变形菌门和拟杆菌门的相对丰度分别与藜麦添加水平呈负相关和正相关。综合分析表明,在WPQ中添加0.6%SP,并在WPQ比例不低于70%的WPQ与WPC混合青贮中使用Mix,青贮效果最佳,更有利于动物健康。