文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Exploring the Effects of Different Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community and In Vitro Gas Production of Forage Oat Silage.

作者信息

Xiong Yi, Xu Jingjing, Guo Linna, Chen Fei, Jiang Dedai, Lin Yanli, Guo Chunze, Li Xiaomei, Chen Yunrong, Ni Kuikui, Yang Fuyu

机构信息

College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Beijing Sure Academy of Biosciences, Beijing 100193, China.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(9):1122. doi: 10.3390/ani12091122.


DOI:10.3390/ani12091122
PMID:35565552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9100174/
Abstract

Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation effects of different bacterial additives on the fermentation quality of forage oat silage. Four additives ( F1, LP; XJJ01, LR; XJJ02, LC; and 1.1161, PP; without additives, CK) were inoculated in forage oat silage, and the fermentation quality and organic compounds were determined after 60 days of ensiling. Notably, LR showed higher dry matter preservation compared to other additives and CK. In addition, LP and LR showed strong lactic acid synthesis capacity, resulting in lower pH compared to other additives and CK. The treatments of PP and LC increased the bacterial diversity in silage, while the bacterial community in the LR group was different from that in other groups. In addition, the PP- and LC-treated oat silage showed significantly lower total in vitro gas production and a lower methane content. These results suggest that LP is more favorable for producing high-quality oat silage than LR, LC, or PP. Both the PP- and LC- treated oat silage may reduce rumen greenhouse gas emissions.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a47/9100174/202906e36fc3/animals-12-01122-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a47/9100174/202906e36fc3/animals-12-01122-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a47/9100174/202906e36fc3/animals-12-01122-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Exploring the Effects of Different Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community and In Vitro Gas Production of Forage Oat Silage.

Animals (Basel). 2022-4-27

[2]
Community Synergy of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cleaner Fermentation of Oat Silage Prepared with a Multispecies Microbial Inoculant.

Microbiol Spectr. 2023-6-15

[3]
Effects of inoculating feruloyl esterase-producing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A1 on ensiling characteristics, in vitro ruminal fermentation and microbiota of alfalfa silage.

J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023-3-14

[4]
Effect of cellulase and lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation quality, carbohydrate conversion, and microbial community of ensiling oat with different moisture contents.

Front Microbiol. 2022-10-5

[5]
Effects of applying molasses, lactic acid bacteria and propionic acid on fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro gas production of total mixed ration silage prepared with oat-common vetch intercrop on the Tibetan Plateau.

J Sci Food Agric. 2016-3-30

[6]
Microbial mechanisms of using feruloyl esterase-producing Lactobacillus plantarum A1 and grape pomace to improve fermentation quality and mitigate ruminal methane emission of ensiled alfalfa for cleaner animal production.

J Environ Manage. 2022-4-15

[7]
Assessment on the Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community of Mixed Silage of Faba Bean With Forage Wheat or Oat.

Front Microbiol. 2022-5-4

[8]
Effects of wilting and additives on the ensiling quality and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of sudangrass silage.

Anim Biosci. 2021-1

[9]
Manipulation of Rice Straw Silage Fermentation with Different Types of Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculant Affects Rumen Microbial Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Production.

Vet Sci. 2021-6-4

[10]
Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives.

J Dairy Sci. 2018-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effects of Two Bacterial Exopolysaccharides on Microbial Community, Fermentation Characteristics and Aerobic Stability in Oat Silage.

Microb Biotechnol. 2025-2

[2]
Effects of lactic acid bacteria and cellulase additives on the fermentation quality, antioxidant activity, and metabolic profile of oat silage.

Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024-10-1

[3]
Community Synergy of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cleaner Fermentation of Oat Silage Prepared with a Multispecies Microbial Inoculant.

Microbiol Spectr. 2023-6-15

[4]
A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material.

Front Microbiol. 2023-2-24

[5]
Effects of Different Types of LAB on Dynamic Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of Native Grass Silage during Anaerobic Fermentation and Aerobic Exposure.

Microorganisms. 2023-2-17

[6]
Effect of different regions on fermentation profiles, microbial communities, and their metabolomic pathways and properties in Italian ryegrass silage.

Front Microbiol. 2023-1-16

[7]
The microbial communities and natural fermentation quality of ensiling oat ( L.) harvest from different elevations on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Front Microbiol. 2023-1-11

[8]
Current approaches on the roles of lactic acid bacteria in crop silage.

Microb Biotechnol. 2023-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Long-term and combined effects of N-[2-(nitrooxy)ethyl]-3-pyridinecarboxamide and fumaric acid on methane production, rumen fermentation, and lactation performance in dairy goats.

J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021-12-6

[2]
Propionic Acid and Sodium Benzoate Affected Biogenic Amine Formation, Microbial Community, and Quality of Oat Silage.

Front Microbiol. 2021-11-8

[3]
Effects of Vanillic Acid on Dynamic Fermentation Parameter, Nitrogen Distribution, Bacterial Community, and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Stylo Silage.

Front Microbiol. 2021-8-25

[4]
Effect of citric acid residue and short-chain fatty acids on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of lucerne ensiled with lactic acid bacteria inoculants.

J Appl Microbiol. 2022-1

[5]
Influence of Pyroligneous Acid on Fermentation Parameters, CO Production and Bacterial Communities of Rice Straw and Stylo Silage.

Front Microbiol. 2021-7-8

[6]
Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Microbial Metabolic Functions of Paper Mulberry Silage: A BIOLOG ECO Microplates Approach.

Front Microbiol. 2021-6-25

[7]
Metabolism Characteristics of Lactic Acid Bacteria and the Expanding Applications in Food Industry.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021-5-12

[8]
Effects of lactic acid bacteria in a silage inoculant on ruminal nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, and lactation performance of high-producing dairy cows.

J Dairy Sci. 2021-8

[9]
Bacterial dynamics of sugarcane silage in the tropics.

Environ Microbiol. 2021-10

[10]
Impacts of Low Temperature and Ensiling Period on the Bacterial Community of Oat Silage by SMRT.

Microorganisms. 2021-1-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索