• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规 MRI、DCE-MRI 和 DWI-MRI 对直肠癌转移性与非转移性淋巴结鉴别诊断价值的系统评价和 Meta 分析研究。

Value of Conventional MRI, DCE-MRI, and DWI-MRI in the Discrimination of Metastatic from Non-Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study.

机构信息

MD Radiology, TUMS (Cancer Institute‑ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.

Technology of Radiology and Radiotherapy Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):401-410. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.2.401.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.2.401
PMID:36853286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10162625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Today, despite many studies on the diagnosis of metastasis to lymph nodes (LNs) in Rectal Cancer (RC), its diagnosis is still very challenging for radiologists. The purpose of the present study was to the assessment of the diagnostic value of conventional MRI, DCE-MRI, and DWI-MRI in the discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in RC.

METHODS

In the present meta-analysis study, we surveyed international databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Science Direct with appropriate keywords. Using the binomial distribution formula, the variance of each study was calculated and the data were analyzed using STATA version 14. Finally, the results of the studies were entered into the random-effects meta-analysis.  Also, we used the chi-squared test and I2 index to calculate heterogeneity among studies, and for evaluating publication bias, Funnel plots and Egger tests were used.

RESULTS

31 articles published between 2005 and 2021, comprising 2517 patients were included in the present study. The sensitivity and specificity of DCE-MRI were 83% (74% to 80%), and 86% (80% to 93%), respectively with PPV 84% (76% to 89%) and NPV 88% (79% to 95%). Also, the sensitivity and specificity of DWI-MRI were 81% (74% to 88%), and 74% (78% to 91%), respectively with PPV 63% (54% to 74%), NPV 85% (77% to 93%), AUC 80 % (75% to 86%) and accuracy 82% (75% to 88%). For conventional MRI, the sensitivity 74% (67% to 80%), specificity 77% (71% to 83%), PPV 62% (48% to 69%), NPV 70% (62% to 77%), AUC 78% (72% to 83%) and 71% accuracy (68% to 78%) was obtained.

CONCLUSION

Based on our finding DCE-MRI is the most suitable technique for the discrimination of metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

尽管目前有许多关于直肠癌(RC)淋巴结转移诊断的研究,但对于放射科医生来说,其诊断仍然极具挑战性。本研究旨在评估常规 MRI、DCE-MRI 和 DWI-MRI 对 RC 中转移性与非转移性淋巴结的鉴别诊断价值。

方法

在本次荟萃分析研究中,我们使用适当的关键词检索了国际数据库,包括 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Science Direct。使用二项式分布公式计算每个研究的方差,并使用 STATA 版本 14 进行数据分析。最后,将研究结果输入到随机效应荟萃分析中。我们还使用卡方检验和 I2 指数来计算研究之间的异质性,并使用漏斗图和 Egger 检验来评估发表偏倚。

结果

本研究共纳入 2005 年至 2021 年期间发表的 31 篇文章,共包含 2517 例患者。DCE-MRI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 83%(74%至 80%)和 86%(80%至 93%),PPV 分别为 84%(76%至 89%)和 NPV 分别为 88%(79%至 95%)。DWI-MRI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 81%(74%至 88%)和 74%(78%至 91%),PPV 分别为 63%(54%至 74%)、NPV 分别为 85%(77%至 93%)、AUC 为 80%(75%至 86%)和准确率分别为 82%(75%至 88%)。对于常规 MRI,获得的敏感性为 74%(67%至 80%)、特异性为 77%(71%至 83%)、PPV 为 62%(48%至 69%)、NPV 为 70%(62%至 77%)、AUC 为 78%(72%至 83%)和准确率为 71%(68%至 78%)。

结论

根据我们的发现,DCE-MRI 是鉴别 RC 中转移性淋巴结的最佳技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/7e630c22ece1/APJCP-24-401-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/de17bd53f3ef/APJCP-24-401-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/c9f63a6987cc/APJCP-24-401-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/fe7267e6112e/APJCP-24-401-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/3618844b010a/APJCP-24-401-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/c2a52fca14e4/APJCP-24-401-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/e6be2ed602d8/APJCP-24-401-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/7e630c22ece1/APJCP-24-401-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/de17bd53f3ef/APJCP-24-401-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/c9f63a6987cc/APJCP-24-401-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/fe7267e6112e/APJCP-24-401-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/3618844b010a/APJCP-24-401-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/c2a52fca14e4/APJCP-24-401-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/e6be2ed602d8/APJCP-24-401-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d9f/10162625/7e630c22ece1/APJCP-24-401-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Value of Conventional MRI, DCE-MRI, and DWI-MRI in the Discrimination of Metastatic from Non-Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study.常规 MRI、DCE-MRI 和 DWI-MRI 对直肠癌转移性与非转移性淋巴结鉴别诊断价值的系统评价和 Meta 分析研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):401-410. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.2.401.
2
[Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].[3.0T高分辨率磁共振成像评估直肠癌患者中直肠系膜淋巴结转移的诊断准确性]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):786-792.
3
Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis on rectal cancer by PET-CT computer imaging combined with MRI technology.利用 PET-CT 计算机成像结合 MRI 技术诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Sep;13(9):1347-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
4
Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.表观扩散系数无法区分直肠癌中的转移性和非转移性淋巴结:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2189-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03986-8. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Improved detection of a tumorous involvement of the mesorectal fascia and locoregional lymph nodes in locally advanced rectal cancer using DCE-MRI.使用动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)改善局部晚期直肠癌中直肠系膜筋膜和局部区域淋巴结肿瘤累及情况的检测。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jul;33(7):901-909. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3083-x. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer.磁共振弥散加权成像在直肠癌淋巴结转移中的诊断价值
World J Surg. 2011 Apr;35(4):895-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-0986-x.
7
Meta analysis of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer patients: Clinical value of DWI and ADC value.乳腺癌患者淋巴结转移的Meta分析:扩散加权成像(DWI)及表观扩散系数(ADC)值的临床价值
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun;85(6):1132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
8
Discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.使用定量动态对比增强磁共振成像鉴别直肠癌中转移性与非转移性直肠系膜淋巴结。
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2016 Aug;36(4):594-600. doi: 10.1007/s11596-016-1631-6. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.术前放化疗治疗直肠癌患者侧盆部淋巴结转移的 FDG-PET/CT 诊断价值。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 May;22(5):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1779-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Value of adding dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI visual assessment to conventional MRI and clinical assessment in the diagnosis of complete tumour response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.动态对比增强 MRI 视觉评估联合常规 MRI 和临床评估在直肠癌放化疗完全缓解诊断中的价值。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1104-1113. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5719-1. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging parameters and serum markers in preoperative rectal cancer evaluation: Combined diagnostic value.动态对比增强磁共振成像参数与血清标志物在术前直肠癌评估中的比较:联合诊断价值
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 May 15;17(5):103809. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809.
2
The value of restriction spectrum imaging in predicting lymph node metastases in rectal cancer: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.限制谱成像在预测直肠癌淋巴结转移中的价值:与扩散加权成像和扩散峰度成像的比较研究
Insights Imaging. 2024 Dec 19;15(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01852-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of breast cancer patients tested for germline BRCA1/2 mutations by next-generation sequencing in Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University.玛希敦大学 Ramathibodi 医院通过下一代测序检测种系 BRCA1/2 突变的乳腺癌患者特征。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Jan;6(1):e1664. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1664. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
The ATM Gene in Breast Cancer: Its Relevance in Clinical Practice.乳腺癌中的 ATM 基因:其在临床实践中的相关性。
Genes (Basel). 2021 May 13;12(5):727. doi: 10.3390/genes12050727.
3
Thai patients who fulfilled NCCN criteria for breast/ovarian cancer genetic assessment demonstrated high prevalence of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes: implication to Asian population testing.
Dynamic contrast‑enhanced MRI combined with intravoxel incoherent motion in quantitative evaluation for preoperative risk stratification of resectable rectal adenocarcinoma.
动态对比增强磁共振成像联合体素内不相干运动在可切除直肠腺癌术前风险分层定量评估中的应用
Oncol Lett. 2024 Nov 20;29(2):68. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14814. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
The Role of Predictive and Prognostic MRI-Based Biomarkers in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.基于MRI的预测和预后生物标志物在直肠癌全新辅助治疗时代的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 9;16(17):3111. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173111.
5
Deep learning for MRI lesion segmentation in rectal cancer.深度学习用于直肠癌磁共振成像病变分割
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 25;11:1394262. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1394262. eCollection 2024.
6
MRI Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Lymph Node Staging Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.利用表观扩散系数对直肠癌淋巴结分期进行磁共振成像评估
Cureus. 2023 Sep 10;15(9):e45002. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45002. eCollection 2023 Sep.
符合 NCCN 乳腺癌/卵巢癌遗传评估标准的泰国患者中,生殖系癌症易感性基因突变的发生率很高:对亚洲人群检测的意义。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(1):237-248. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06152-4. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
BRCA testing and outcomes in women with breast cancer.BRCA 检测与乳腺癌女性患者的结局。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):839-850. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06038-x. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): review of its molecular characteristics, screening, treatment, and prognosis.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌 (HBOC):其分子特征、筛查、治疗和预后的综述。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Nov;28(6):1167-1180. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01148-2. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
6
Biomarkers of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.乳腺癌新辅助/辅助化疗的生物标志物。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;9(3):27. doi: 10.21037/cco.2020.01.06. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Breast cancer prevention in high-risk women.高危女性的乳腺癌预防。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;65:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
An update on genetic risk assessment and prevention: the role of genetic testing panels in breast cancer.遗传风险评估与预防的最新进展:基因检测面板在乳腺癌中的作用。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2019 Sep;19(9):787-801. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1659730. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
9
Multi gene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer - is it ready to be used?遗传性乳腺癌的多基因检测——它准备好投入使用了吗?
Med Pharm Rep. 2019 Jul;92(3):220-225. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1083. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
A systematic review of the international prevalence of mutation in breast cancer.乳腺癌基因突变国际患病率的系统评价。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 11;11:543-561. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S206949. eCollection 2019.