Sivaramakrishnan Gowri, Sridharan Kannan, Alsobaiei Muneera
Specialist Prosthodontist and Dental Tutor, Dental Postgraduate training department, Ministry of Health, Manama, Bahrain.
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
BDJ Open. 2023 Mar 1;9(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00137-9.
The association of asthma with oral conditions such as dental caries, dental erosion, periodontal diseases and oral mucosal changes has been the subject of debate among dental practitioners. Existing evidence indicates that an inhaler is the most common and effective way of delivering the asthma medications directly into the lungs. Few studies in the past attributed this association to the changes in salivary flow caused due to these medications. Considering this unclear association, the aim of the present meta-analyses is to identify the association between erosive toothwear and asthma from individual studies conducted until date.
Electronic databases were systematically searched until 30th September 2022. Articles identified using the search strategy were imported to RAYYAN systematic review software. Data was extracted relating to study design, geographic location, year of publication, sample size, the assessment method for erosive toothwear and asthma. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was utilized to assess the quality of evidence reported from the included studies. RevMan Version 5.3 was used to perform a random-effects meta-analysis to produce pooled estimates from OR and 95% CI of included studies. The I² statistic was used to determine the extent of heterogeneity. A funnel plot was generated to visually assess the potential for publication bias. Sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding individual studies one at a time. GRADE approach was used for grading the evidence for key comparisons.
Twelve articles were included in the final meta-analysis. A total of 1027 asthmatics and 5617 non-asthmatics were included. All studies demonstrated moderate to low risk of bias. The overall pooled estimate (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 0.96, 4.29) and subgroup analyses in children (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 0.63, 4.42) did not show statistically significant difference in the occurrence of dental erosion between the asthmatic and non-asthmatic group. However, asthmatic adults had significantly greater dental erosion in comparison to the control adults (OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.24, 6.16). Sensitivity analyses also provided inconclusive evidence. Funnel plot asymmetry indicated significant heterogeneity, changes in effect size and selective publication.
The association between inhalational asthmatic medication and tooth wear is inconclusive. There are a number of confounding factors that play a greater role in causing dental erosion in these patients. Dentist must pay particular attention to these factors while treating asthmatic patients. The authors produce a comprehensive checklist in order to ensure complete assessment before providing advice on their medications alone.
哮喘与诸如龋齿、牙齿侵蚀、牙周疾病和口腔黏膜变化等口腔状况之间的关联一直是牙科从业者争论的话题。现有证据表明,吸入器是将哮喘药物直接输送到肺部的最常见且有效的方式。过去很少有研究将这种关联归因于这些药物导致的唾液流量变化。鉴于这种关联尚不明确,本荟萃分析的目的是从迄今为止开展的个体研究中确定侵蚀性牙齿磨损与哮喘之间的关联。
对电子数据库进行系统检索,直至2022年9月30日。使用检索策略识别出的文章被导入到RAYYAN系统评价软件中。提取与研究设计、地理位置、发表年份、样本量、侵蚀性牙齿磨损和哮喘的评估方法相关的数据。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评估纳入研究报告的证据质量。使用RevMan 5.3版进行随机效应荟萃分析,以得出纳入研究的OR值和95%置信区间的合并估计值。I²统计量用于确定异质性程度。生成漏斗图以直观评估发表偏倚的可能性。通过逐一排除个体研究进行敏感性分析。采用GRADE方法对关键比较的证据进行分级。
最终的荟萃分析纳入了12篇文章。总共纳入了1027名哮喘患者和5617名非哮喘患者。所有研究显示偏倚风险为中度至低度。总体合并估计值(OR:2.03;95%置信区间:0.96,4.29)以及儿童亚组分析(OR:1.67;95%置信区间:0.63,4.42)在哮喘组和非哮喘组之间牙齿侵蚀的发生率上未显示出统计学上的显著差异。然而,与对照成年人相比,哮喘成年患者的牙齿侵蚀明显更严重(OR:2.76;95%置信区间:1.24,6.16)。敏感性分析也提供了不确定的证据。漏斗图不对称表明存在显著的异质性、效应大小变化和选择性发表。
吸入性哮喘药物与牙齿磨损之间的关联尚无定论。在导致这些患者牙齿侵蚀方面,有许多混杂因素发挥着更大的作用。牙科医生在治疗哮喘患者时必须特别关注这些因素。作者制定了一份全面的清单,以便在仅就其药物提供建议之前确保进行全面评估。