Oyarzo-Aravena Alexis, Arce-Alvarez Alexis, Salazar-Ardiles Camila, Ramirez-Campillo Rodrigo, Alvarez Cristian, Toledo Camilo, Izquierdo Mikel, Andrade David C
Exercise Applied Physiology Laboratory, Centro de investigación en Fisiología y Medicina de Altura, Departamento Biomédico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile.
Magister en Fisiología Clínica de Ejercicio, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Front Physiol. 2023 Feb 13;14:1087829. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1087829. eCollection 2023.
The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) represents the lowest minute ventilation to oxygen consumption ratio (VE/VO2) and can be estimated during a CPET at submaximal intensity when an exercise test until volitional fatigue is not always advisable (i.e., a conflict zone where you cannot be confident of the security because near-competition, off-season, among other). COP's physiological components have not been wholly described yet. Therefore, this study seeks to identify the determinants of COP in highly trained athletes and its influence on maximum and sub-maximum variables during CPET through principal c omponent analysis (PCA) (explains the dataset's variance). Female ( = 9; age, 17.4 ± 3.1 y; maximal VO2 [VO2max]), 46.2 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min) and male ( = 24; age, 19.7 ± 4.0 y; VO2max, 56.1 ± 7.6 mL/kg/min) athletes performed a CPET to determine the COP, ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2), and VO2max. The PCA was used to determine the relationship between variables and COP, explaining their variance. Our data revealed that females and males displayed different COP values. Indeed, males showed a significant diminished COP compared to the female group (22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 27.2 ±3.4 VE/VO2, respectively); nevertheless, COP was allocated before VT1 in both groups. PC analysis revealed that the COP variance was mainly explained (75.6%) by PC1 (expired CO at VO2max) and PC2 (VE at VT2), possibly influencing cardiorespiratory efficiency at VO2max and VT2. Our data suggest that COP could be used as a submaximal index to monitor and assess cardiorespiratory system efficiency in endurance athletes. The COP could be particularly useful during the offseason and competitive periods and the return to the sports continuum.
心肺最佳点(COP)代表最低的分钟通气量与耗氧量比值(VE/VO2),当进行次最大强度的心肺运动试验(CPET)时,如果进行直至自愿疲劳的运动测试并不总是可取的(例如,在接近比赛、非赛季等存在安全顾虑的冲突区域),则可以对其进行估算。COP的生理组成部分尚未完全阐明。因此,本研究旨在通过主成分分析(PCA)(解释数据集的方差)来确定高水平运动员COP的决定因素及其对CPET期间最大和次最大变量的影响。女性(n = 9;年龄,17.4±3.1岁;最大摄氧量[VO2max],46.2±5.9 mL/kg/min)和男性(n = 24;年龄,19.7±4.0岁;VO2max,56.1±7.6 mL/kg/min)运动员进行CPET以确定COP、通气阈值1(VT1)和2(VT2)以及VO2max。PCA用于确定变量与COP之间的关系,并解释其方差。我们的数据显示,女性和男性表现出不同的COP值。事实上,男性的COP显著低于女性组(分别为22.6±2.9与27.2±3.4 VE/VO2);然而,两组的COP均在VT1之前出现。主成分分析显示,COP的方差主要由主成分1(VO2max时的呼出一氧化碳)和主成分2(VT2时的VE)解释(75.6%),这可能影响VO2max和VT2时的心肺效率。我们的数据表明,COP可作为一个次最大指标,用于监测和评估耐力运动员的心肺系统效率。COP在非赛季、比赛期以及回归运动连续体期间可能特别有用。