Sheridan Sinead, McCarren Andrew, Gray Cleona, Murphy Ronan P, Harrison Michael, Wong Stephen H S, Moyna Niall M
Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2021 Apr;19(2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Measures of oxygen uptake efficiency (OUE) have been used to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in adolescents unable to perform maximal exercise. The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) and oxygen uptake efficiency plateau (OUEP) have been proposed as surrogates for maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O). We assessed the validity of the OUES and OUEP as predictors of V̇O in healthy male adolescents.
Sixty-three healthy male adolescents aged 15.40 ± 0.34 years underwent an incremental treadmill test to determine V̇O, OUES and OUEP. OUE throughout the test was assessed by dividing each V̇O value by the corresponding minute ventilation (V̇) value. OUEP was determined as the 90 s average highest consecutive values for OUE. OUES was determined using data up to the ventilatory threshold (VT) by calculating the slope of the linear relation between V̇O and the logarithm of V̇.
Limits of agreement for V̇O predicted by OUES (±13.3 mL kgmin) and OUEP (±16.7 mL kgmin) relative to V̇O were wide and a magnitude bias was found for OUES and OUEP as predictors of V̇O (p < 0.001).
The OUES and OUEP do not accurately predict V̇O in male adolescents and should not replace V̇O when assessing CRF in this population.
背景/目的:摄氧效率(OUE)指标已被用于评估无法进行最大运动的青少年的心肺适能(CRF)。摄氧效率斜率(OUES)和摄氧效率平台期(OUEP)已被提议作为最大摄氧量(V̇O)的替代指标。我们评估了OUES和OUEP作为健康男性青少年V̇O预测指标的有效性。
63名年龄为15.40±0.34岁的健康男性青少年进行递增式跑步机测试,以确定V̇O、OUES和OUEP。通过将每个V̇O值除以相应的分钟通气量(V̇)值来评估整个测试过程中的OUE。OUEP被确定为OUE的90秒平均最高连续值。OUES通过使用直至通气阈值(VT)的数据,通过计算V̇O与V̇对数之间的线性关系斜率来确定。
相对于V̇O,OUES(±13.3 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)和OUEP(±16.7 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)预测的V̇O的一致性界限较宽,并且发现OUES和OUEP作为V̇O的预测指标存在量级偏差(p < 0.001)。
OUES和OUEP不能准确预测男性青少年的V̇O,在评估该人群的CRF时不应替代V̇O。