• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我分化与关系依附、质量和稳定性的区分:来自西班牙和美国夫妇的对偶和纵向数据的路径分析。

Differentiation of self and relationship attachment, quality, and stability: A path analysis of dyadic and longitudinal data from Spanish and U.S. couples.

机构信息

Institute for Culture and Society (ICS), Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.

Department of Counseling, School Psychology, and Family Science, University of Nebraska Kearney, Kearney, NE, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0282482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282482. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0282482
PMID:36862686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9980780/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In the current study, we examined the relationship between differentiation of self (DoS) and key relationship functioning variables among couples. This is the first study to test such relationships using a cross-cultural longitudinal approach (i.e., samples from Spain and the U.S.) while controlling for stressful life events-a key theoretical construct in Bowen Family Systems Theory.

METHODS

A sample of 958 individuals (n = 137 couples from Spain, and n = 342 couples from U.S.) was used in cross sectional and longitudinal models to analyze the effects of a shared reality construct of DoS on anxious attachment, avoidant attachment, relationship stability, and relationship quality while considering gender and culture.

RESULTS

Our cross-sectional results indicated that men and women from both cultures experienced an increase in DoS over time. DoS predicted increased relationship quality and stability and decreased anxious and avoidant attachment in U.S. participants. Longitudinally, DoS predicted increased relationship quality and decreased anxious attachment for Spanish women and men, while it predicted greater relationship quality and stability and decreased anxious and avoidant attachment of U.S. couples. Implications of these mixed findings are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of DoS are linked with a better couple relationship across time, despite varying levels of stressful life events. Although some cultural differences regarding the links between relationship stability and avoidant attachment exist, this positive link between differentiation and the couple relationship is mostly consistent across the U.S. and Spain. The implications and relevance for integration into research and practice are discussed.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们考察了自我分化(DoS)与夫妻关系功能变量之间的关系。这是首次使用跨文化纵向研究方法(即来自西班牙和美国的样本)来检验这些关系,同时控制应激性生活事件——这是鲍文家庭系统理论的一个关键理论概念。

方法

使用横断面和纵向模型分析了共现实结构的 DoS 对焦虑依恋、回避依恋、关系稳定性和关系质量的影响,样本包括来自西班牙的 137 对夫妇(n=137)和来自美国的 342 对夫妇(n=342),同时考虑了性别和文化的影响。

结果

我们的横断面结果表明,来自两种文化的男性和女性随着时间的推移,DoS 呈上升趋势。DoS 预测美国参与者的关系质量和稳定性增加,焦虑和回避依恋减少。纵向研究中,DoS 预测西班牙男女的关系质量和焦虑依恋减少,而对美国夫妇的关系质量和稳定性以及焦虑和回避依恋减少有预测作用。讨论了这些混合发现的意义。

结论

尽管应激性生活事件水平不同,但较高的 DoS 水平与夫妻关系的改善有关。尽管在关系稳定性和回避依恋之间的联系方面存在一些文化差异,但这种分化与夫妻关系之间的积极联系在很大程度上是一致的,跨越了美国和西班牙。讨论了这些结果对研究和实践的意义和相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4e/9980780/b757bb6a915d/pone.0282482.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4e/9980780/b757bb6a915d/pone.0282482.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4e/9980780/b757bb6a915d/pone.0282482.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Differentiation of self and relationship attachment, quality, and stability: A path analysis of dyadic and longitudinal data from Spanish and U.S. couples.自我分化与关系依附、质量和稳定性的区分:来自西班牙和美国夫妇的对偶和纵向数据的路径分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0282482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282482. eCollection 2023.
2
Adult attachment, hostile conflict, and relationship adjustment among couples facing multiple sclerosis.成人依恋、敌对冲突与多发性硬化症患者夫妇的关系调整。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):836-853. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12258. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Couple Adjustment and Differentiation of Self in the United States, Italy, and Spain: A Cross-Cultural Study.美、意、西三国的夫妻关系调适与自我分化:跨文化研究。
Fam Process. 2020 Dec;59(4):1552-1568. doi: 10.1111/famp.12522. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Attachment insecurity and breadcrumbing engagement in young adults: a cross-sectional, cross-country study in India and Spain. Attachment 不安全感和面包屑式交往在年轻成年人中的表现:印度和西班牙的横断面、跨国研究。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 25;11(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01404-y.
5
Insecure Attachment, Emotion Dysregulation, and Psychological Aggression in Couples.不安全依恋、情绪失调与夫妻间的心理侵犯。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):NP10908-NP10936. doi: 10.1177/0886260519877939. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: a longitudinal analysis.依恋风格、性别与关系稳定性:一项纵向分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Mar;66(3):502-12. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.3.502.
7
[Differences in relationship quality and dyadic coping for attachment-related couple types].[依恋相关夫妻类型在关系质量和二元应对方式上的差异]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2013 May;63(5):185-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333291. Epub 2013 May 22.
8
"Don't stand so close to me": an attachment perspective of disengagement and avoidance in marriage.“别靠我太近”:婚姻中脱离和回避的依附视角。
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Jun;27(3):484-494. doi: 10.1037/a0032867.
9
Romantic attachment and relationship functioning in same-sex couples.同性伴侣中的浪漫依恋和关系功能。
J Couns Psychol. 2013 Jan;60(1):72-82. doi: 10.1037/a0030994.
10
Are attachment dimensions associated with infertility-related stress in couples undergoing their first IVF treatment? A study on the individual and cross-partner effect.在接受首次 IVF 治疗的夫妇中,依恋维度与与不孕相关的压力有关吗?一项关于个体和跨伴侣影响的研究。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Nov;27(11):3215-25. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des307. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the personality and relationship factors that mediate the connection between differentiation of self and phubbing.探究自我分化和低头症之间关系的中介人格和关系因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55560-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Differentiation of self: A scoping review of Bowen Family Systems Theory's core construct.自我分化:鲍文家庭系统理论核心概念的范围综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Feb;91:102101. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102101. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
2
Why women choose divorce: An evolutionary perspective.女性为何选择离婚:一种进化视角。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间的人际关系质量与心理健康
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238906. eCollection 2020.
4
How Gender Differences in Emotional Cutoff and Reactivity Influence Couple's Sexual and Relational Outcomes.情感切断和反应的性别差异如何影响夫妻的性和关系结果。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2021;47(1):16-31. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1800541. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
Couple Adjustment and Differentiation of Self in the United States, Italy, and Spain: A Cross-Cultural Study.美、意、西三国的夫妻关系调适与自我分化:跨文化研究。
Fam Process. 2020 Dec;59(4):1552-1568. doi: 10.1111/famp.12522. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
The Experience of Learning EFT in Spanish-speaking Countries: A Multi-National Replication Study.西班牙语国家学习情绪焦点疗法的体验:一项多国复制研究。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2020 Apr;46(2):256-271. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12383. Epub 2019 May 13.
7
Exploring Similarity and Stability of Differentiation in Relationships: A Dyadic Study of Bowen's Theory.探讨关系中分化的相似性和稳定性:对鲍恩理论的对偶研究。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2019 Oct;45(4):592-605. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12370. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
8
Stressful Life Events and Physical and Psychological Health: Mediating Effects of Differentiation of Self in a Spanish Sample.应激性生活事件与身心健康:西班牙样本中自我分化的中介作用。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2019 Oct;45(4):578-591. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12358. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Differentiation of Self and Dyadic Adjustment in Couple Relationships: A Dyadic Analysis Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.个体差异和夫妻关系中的双重调整:使用演员-伙伴相互依赖模型的双分析。
Fam Process. 2019 Sep;58(3):698-715. doi: 10.1111/famp.12370. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
10
Couple Differentiation: Mediator or Moderator of Depressive Symptoms and Relationship Satisfaction?夫妻差异:抑郁症状和关系满意度的中介还是调节因素?
J Marital Fam Ther. 2019 Oct;45(4):563-577. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12326. Epub 2018 Mar 9.