Welfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Helsinki, Finland.
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Nov 9;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2022-0069.
The purpose of this study was to elucidate facilitators and barriers to health system resilience and resilient responses at local and regional levels during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors utilized a qualitative research approach and conducted semi-structured interviews ( = 32) with study participants representing five different regions in Finland. Study participants were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. All study participants had been in management and civil servant positions during the first year of the pandemic, representing municipalities, municipalities' social and healthcare services, hospital districts and regional state administrative agencies. All interviews were completed remotely from April to December 2021 and the recordings transcribed verbatim. The authors coded the transcripts in ATLAS.ti 9.1 using directed content analysis.
The findings highlighted a wide range of localized responses to the pandemic in Finland. Facilitators to health system resilience included active networks of cooperation, crisis anticipation, transitioning into crisis leadership mode, learning how to incorporate new modes of operation, as well as relying on the competencies and motivation of health workforce. The authors found several barriers to health system resilience, including fragmented organization and management particularly in settings where integrated health care systems were not in place, insufficient preparedness to a prolonged crisis, lack of reliable information regarding COVID-19, not having plans in place for crisis communication, pandemic fatigue, and outflux of health workforce to other positions with better compensation and working conditions.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Factors affecting health system resilience are often studied at the aggregate level of a nation. This study offers insights into what resilient responses look like from the perspective of local and regional actors in a decentralized health system. The results highlight that local capacities and context matter greatly for resilience. The authors call for more nuanced analyses on health systems and health system resilience at the sub-national level.
本研究旨在阐明在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,芬兰地方和地区层面的卫生系统弹性及其弹性反应的促进因素和障碍。
设计/方法/方法:作者采用定性研究方法,对来自芬兰五个不同地区的 32 名研究参与者进行了半结构化访谈。研究参与者是通过目的性和滚雪球抽样招募的。所有研究参与者在大流行的第一年都担任过管理和公务员职务,代表了市、市社会和医疗保健服务、医院区和地区国家行政机构。所有访谈均于 2021 年 4 月至 12 月远程进行,并逐字转录录音。作者使用定向内容分析在 ATLAS.ti 9.1 中对转录本进行了编码。
研究结果突出了芬兰对大流行的各种本地化反应。卫生系统弹性的促进因素包括积极的合作网络、危机预测、过渡到危机领导模式、学习如何纳入新的运营模式,以及依赖卫生劳动力的能力和动力。作者发现了一些卫生系统弹性的障碍,包括组织和管理的碎片化,特别是在没有整合的卫生保健系统的地方;对长期危机的准备不足;缺乏关于 COVID-19 的可靠信息;没有为危机沟通制定计划;大流行疲劳;以及卫生劳动力外流到其他薪酬和工作条件更好的职位。
原创性/价值:影响卫生系统弹性的因素通常在国家层面进行研究。本研究从分散的卫生系统中地方和地区行动者的角度提供了对弹性反应的见解。结果突出表明,地方能力和背景对弹性至关重要。作者呼吁在国家以下一级对卫生系统和卫生系统弹性进行更细致的分析。