Kihlström Laura, Karreinen Soila
Welfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8563. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8563. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
In this paper we draw upon the review article "Re-evaluating Our Knowledge of Health System Resilience During COVID-19: Lessons from the First Two Years of the Pandemic" by Saulnier et al to propose some additional themes to be considered regarding ongoing conversations on health system resilience. Complementing the lessons learned brought forward in the article, we propose three thematic areas which may enrichen this conversation. These three themes are posed as questions: (1) Transformation - towards what? (2) Crises and shocks - what counts as such? and (3) Levels and scales - can tensions be reconciled? While our insights are strongly rooted in research results on health system resilience during COVID-19 in Finland, we seek to discuss their wider implications for health system resilience and beyond the context of a single country.
在本文中,我们借鉴了索尔尼尔等人撰写的综述文章《重新评估我们对新冠疫情期间卫生系统韧性的认识:大流行头两年的经验教训》,提出一些在关于卫生系统韧性的持续讨论中需要考虑的额外主题。作为对文章中所汲取经验教训的补充,我们提出了三个可能丰富这一讨论的主题领域。这三个主题以问题的形式呈现:(1)转型——朝着什么方向?(2)危机与冲击——哪些可算作此类?以及(3)层次与规模——紧张关系能否得到调和?虽然我们的见解深深植根于芬兰新冠疫情期间卫生系统韧性的研究结果,但我们试图讨论它们对卫生系统韧性更广泛的影响,以及在单个国家背景之外的影响。