• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谈试验:卡迪夫南岸社区少数族裔成员对临床试验态度的一项以艺术为基础的探索。

Talking Trials: An arts-based exploration of attitudes to clinical trials amongst minority ethnic members of the South Riverside Community of Cardiff.

机构信息

Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Social and Community Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1236-1245. doi: 10.1111/hex.13740. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13740
PMID:36864604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10154814/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials must include diverse participants to ensure the wide applicability of results. However, people from ethnic minorities are included in clinical trials at rates lower than expected given their share of the population. Working with South Riverside Community Development Centre (SRCDC), Talking Trials used public engagement to foster discussions around the underrepresentation of those from minority ethnic communities in clinical trials and to identify and address concerns surrounding trial participation.

METHODS

We conducted three workshops with 13 co-researchers from minority ethnic backgrounds. We explored perceptions and understanding of clinical trials alongside participatory art activities to help move away from verbocentric methods of communication. These artworks formed an exhibition that was presented to the community, prompting further discussions and engagement.

FINDINGS

Co-production workshops were an effective tool to introduce the public to trial research. With little knowledge of clinical trials at the beginning of the process, our co-researchers formed a cohesive group, sharing initial fears and mistrust towards trials. As conversations progressed these attitudes clearly shifted. Artwork produced during the workshops was incorporated into an exhibition. Quotes and creative pieces from the group were included to reflect the themes identified. Presenting the exhibition at Riverside Festival enabled further engagement with a wider diverse community. The focus on co-production helped build a network of individuals new to research and keen to become involved further.

CONCLUSION

Inclusive and democratic co-production, enriched by participatory art practices, provided a powerful means of enabling our group to create new insights and foster new relationships. Projects like Talking Trials can diversify the research process itself-for example, four co-researchers have commenced lay research partner roles on trial management groups and a lay advisory group is in development.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Three members of staff at SRCDC were on the project delivery group and involved in the initial project design, subsequently helping to connect us with members of the Riverside community to work as co-researchers. Two of the SRCDC staff are co-authors of this manuscript. The project had 13 public co-researchers guiding the direction of this research and creating the artwork displayed in the art exhibition.

摘要

介绍

临床试验必须纳入多样化的参与者,以确保研究结果具有广泛的适用性。然而,少数民族人群参与临床试验的比例低于预期,这与他们在人口中所占的比例不符。通过与南河滨社区发展中心(South Riverside Community Development Centre,SRCDC)合作,Talking Trials 使用公众参与的方式,就少数民族群体在临床试验中代表性不足的问题进行讨论,并确定和解决参与试验的相关问题。

方法

我们与 13 位具有少数民族背景的共同研究人员合作,开展了 3 次研讨会。我们通过参与式艺术活动,探讨了公众对临床试验的看法和理解,以帮助摆脱以语言为中心的沟通方式。这些艺术作品形成了一个展览,向社区展示,引发了进一步的讨论和参与。

发现

共同制作研讨会是向公众介绍试验研究的有效工具。在项目开始时,我们的共同研究人员对临床试验知之甚少,但他们形成了一个紧密的团体,分享了对试验的最初恐惧和不信任。随着对话的进行,这些态度明显发生了转变。工作坊期间创作的艺术品被纳入展览。小组的引语和创意作品被纳入其中,以反映确定的主题。在河滨节上展示展览,使更多不同背景的社区能够进一步参与。对共同制作的关注有助于建立一个新的研究人员网络,他们对参与研究充满热情。

结论

包容性和民主的共同制作,通过参与式艺术实践得到丰富,为我们的团队提供了一种有力的手段,使他们能够创造新的见解并建立新的关系。像 Talking Trials 这样的项目可以使研究过程本身多样化,例如,有 4 位共同研究人员开始担任临床试验管理小组的初级研究合作伙伴,并且正在组建一个初级咨询小组。

患者或公众贡献

SRCDC 的 3 名工作人员参与了项目交付小组,并参与了项目的初步设计,随后帮助我们与河滨社区的成员联系,作为共同研究人员一起工作。SRCDC 的 2 名工作人员是本文的共同作者。该项目有 13 名公众共同研究人员指导研究方向,并创作了艺术展览中展示的艺术品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48da/10154814/890a7f0fc388/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48da/10154814/53bf8af15afb/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48da/10154814/890a7f0fc388/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48da/10154814/53bf8af15afb/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48da/10154814/890a7f0fc388/HEX-26--g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Talking Trials: An arts-based exploration of attitudes to clinical trials amongst minority ethnic members of the South Riverside Community of Cardiff.谈试验:卡迪夫南岸社区少数族裔成员对临床试验态度的一项以艺术为基础的探索。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1236-1245. doi: 10.1111/hex.13740. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators for Ethnic Minority Groups to Audio Recording Recruitment Discussions in Clinical Trials: A Participatory Approach to Improving Informed Consent and Participation.了解临床试验中少数族裔群体进行招募讨论录音的障碍与促进因素:一种改善知情同意和参与的参与式方法。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70210. doi: 10.1111/hex.70210.
3
Building trust and inclusion with under-served groups: a public involvement project employing a knowledge mobilisation approach.与服务不足群体建立信任与包容:一个采用知识传播方法的公众参与项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 11;10(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00647-2.
4
Create to Collaborate: using creative activity and participatory performance in online workshops to build collaborative research relationships.为合作而创作:在在线工作坊中运用创意活动和参与式表演来建立合作研究关系。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00512-8.
5
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
6
Coproducing justice in public involvement: impact-led iterative development of a dance based community engagement project building relationships in marginalised communities.在公众参与中共同创造正义:以影响为导向的基于舞蹈的社区参与项目的迭代式发展,在边缘化社区建立关系。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 8;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00714-2.
7
Inclusive approaches to involvement of community groups in health research: the co-produced CHICO guidance.让社区团体参与健康研究的包容性方法:共同制定的CHICO指南。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 7;9(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00492-9.
8
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.让南亚患者参与临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.
9
Building trust and increasing inclusion in public health research: co-produced strategies for engaging UK ethnic minority communities in research.建立公共卫生研究中的信任和包容性:让英国少数族裔社区参与研究的共同制定策略。
Public Health. 2024 Aug;233:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
10
"We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust" …. Involving and engaging 'seldom listened to' community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach.“我们并非难以接触,但我们可能发现难以信任”……让“很少被倾听”的社区声音参与到临床转化健康研究中:一种社会创新方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 26;7(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Radiology in Community Engagement.放射学在社区参与中的作用。
Radiographics. 2025 Aug;45(8):e240185. doi: 10.1148/rg.240185.
2
Understanding Inclusion and Participation of People From Black African Diaspora Communities in Health and Care Research: A Realist Review.理解非洲黑人散居社区人群在健康与护理研究中的纳入与参与:一项实在论综述
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70298. doi: 10.1111/hex.70298.
3
Patient and public involvement in the design and protocol development for a platform randomised trial to evaluate diagnostic tests to optimise antimicrobial therapy (PROTECT).

本文引用的文献

1
Digital participatory workshops with patients and health professionals to develop an intervention for the management of polypharmacy: results from a mixed-methods evaluation and methodological conclusions.与患者和医疗专业人员开展数字参与式研讨会以制定多药治疗管理干预措施:混合方法评估结果及方法学结论
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 16;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00387-1.
2
Trial Forge Guidance 3: randomised trials and how to recruit and retain individuals from ethnic minority groups-practical guidance to support better practice.试验锻造指南 3:随机试验以及如何招募和保留少数民族个体——支持更好实践的实用指南。
Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06553-w.
3
患者和公众参与一项平台随机试验的设计和方案制定,该试验旨在评估诊断测试以优化抗菌治疗(PROTECT)。
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Sep 20;4:52. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13591.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Public involvement and engagement in scientific research and higher education: the only way is ethics?公众参与科学研究和高等教育:唯一的途径是道德规范吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 31;10(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00587-x.
5
Improving Conversations about Parkinson's Dementia.改善帕金森病痴呆症的交流。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024 Jul;11(7):814-824. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14054. Epub 2024 May 2.
Assessing Ethnic Inequalities in Diagnostic Interval of Common Cancers: A Population-Based UK Cohort Study.
评估常见癌症诊断间隔中的种族不平等:一项基于英国人群队列的研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;14(13):3085. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133085.
4
Digital approaches to enhancing community engagement in clinical trials.增强社区参与临床试验的数字化方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Mar 25;5(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00581-1.
5
Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process.制定改善服务不足群体试验交付的路线图:来自英国多方利益相关者进程的结果。
Trials. 2020 Aug 1;21(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04613-7.
6
The impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review.种族对新冠病毒病临床结局的影响:一项系统评价
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 3;23:100404. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100404. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance.超越西方、有教养、工业化、富有和民主(WEIRD)心理学:衡量和绘制文化和心理距离的尺度。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):678-701. doi: 10.1177/0956797620916782. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Evaluating Complex Health Interventions With Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Improve the Use of Qualitative Methods?用随机对照试验评估复杂的卫生干预措施:如何提高定性方法的使用?
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):623-631. doi: 10.1177/1049732319831032.
9
Toward a psychology of : Making psychological science more representative of the human population.走向一种心理学:使心理科学更能代表人类群体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11401-11405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721165115.
10
How does race/ethnicity influence pharmacological response to asthma therapies?种族/民族如何影响哮喘治疗药物的药理反应?
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018 Apr;14(4):435-446. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1449833. Epub 2018 Mar 12.