Takeshima Masahiro, Aoki Yumi, Ie Kenya, Katsumoto Eiichi, Tsuru Eichi, Tsuboi Takashi, Inada Ken, Kise Morito, Watanabe Koichiro, Mishima Kazuo, Takaesu Yoshikazu
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 14;14:1071962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1071962. eCollection 2023.
Benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines are still widely prescribed despite safety concerns and the introduction of novel hypnotics (orexin receptor antagonists [ORA] and melatonin receptor agonists [MRA]), which may be influenced by physicians' attitudes toward hypnotics.
A questionnaire survey was administered to 962 physicians between October 2021 and February 2022, investigating frequently prescribed hypnotics and the reasons for their selection.
ORA were the most frequently prescribed at 84.3%, followed by non-benzodiazepines (75.4%), MRA (57.1%), and benzodiazepines (54.3%). Compared to non-frequent prescribers of hypnotics, a logistic regression analysis showed that frequent ORA prescribers were more concerned with efficacy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.54, = 0.044) and safety (OR: 4.52, 95% CI: 2.99-6.84, < 0.001), frequent MRA prescribers were more concerned with safety (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.77-3.46, < 0.001), frequent non-benzodiazepine prescribers were more concerned with efficacy (OR: 4.19, 95% CI: 2.91-6.04, < 0.001), and frequent benzodiazepine prescribers were more concerned with efficacy (OR: 4.19, 95% CI: 2.91-6.04, < 0.001) but less concerned with safety (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16-0.39, < 0.001).
This study suggested that physicians believed ORA to be an effective and safe hypnotic and were compelled to prescribe benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine frequently, choosing efficacy over safety.
尽管存在安全问题且新型催眠药(食欲素受体拮抗剂[ORA]和褪黑素受体激动剂[MRA])已问世,但苯二氮䓬类药物和非苯二氮䓬类药物仍被广泛处方,这可能受到医生对催眠药态度的影响。
在2021年10月至2022年2月期间,对962名医生进行了问卷调查,调查常用的催眠药及其选择原因。
ORA的处方率最高,为84.3%,其次是非苯二氮䓬类药物(75.4%)、MRA(57.1%)和苯二氮䓬类药物(54.3%)。与不常处方催眠药的医生相比,逻辑回归分析显示,经常处方ORA的医生更关注疗效(优势比[OR]:1.60,95%置信区间[CI]:1.01 - 2.54,P = 0.044)和安全性(OR:4.52,95% CI:2.99 - 6.84,P < 0.001),经常处方MRA的医生更关注安全性(OR:2.48,95% CI:1.77 - 3.46,P < 0.001),经常处方非苯二氮䓬类药物的医生更关注疗效(OR:4.19,95% CI:2.91 - 6.04,P < 0.001),经常处方苯二氮䓬类药物的医生更关注疗效(OR:4.19,95% CI:2.91 - 6.04,P < 0.001)但对安全性的关注较少(OR:0.25,95% CI:0.16 - 0.39,P < 0.001)。
本研究表明,医生认为ORA是一种有效且安全的催眠药,并且被迫频繁处方苯二氮䓬类药物和非苯二氮䓬类药物,选择疗效而非安全性。