• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一周中的日期对自由主义-保守主义的影响:来自中国大规模在线调查的证据。

The day-of-week (DOW) effect on liberalism-conservatism: Evidence from a large-scale online survey in China.

作者信息

Ye Shengquan, So Justin Juk Man, Ng Ting Kin, Ma Mac Zewei

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioural Science, Colleague of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 14;13:1074334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074334. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074334
PMID:36865674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9971015/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Past research has shown that psychological states tend to fluctuate across the days of a week, which is referred to as the day-of-week (DOW) effect. This study investigated the DOW effect on liberalism-conservatism among Chinese people by testing two competing hypotheses. According to the cognitive states hypothesis, it was predicted that liberalism would be high on Mondays but gradually decrease to Fridays due to the depletion of cognitive resources over the weekdays. In contrast, the affective states hypothesis predicted the opposite, considering the more positive affect brought by the approaching weekends. Both hypotheses predicted the level of liberalism would peak at weekends.

METHODS

Data ( = 171,830) were collected via an online questionnaire, the Chinese Political Compass (CPC) survey, which includes 50 items to measure people' liberalism-conservatism in three domains (i.e., political, economic, and social).

RESULTS

The results showed the level of liberalism decreased gradually from Mondays until Wednesdays, rebounded from Wednesdays to Fridays, and peaked at weekends.

DISCUSSION

The V-shaped pattern suggested that the DOW fluctuation in liberalism-conservatism could derive from the synergy of both cognitive and affective processes, instead of either one alone. The findings have important implications for practice and policy-making, including the recent pilot scheme of 4-day workweek.

摘要

引言

过去的研究表明,心理状态往往会在一周的不同日子里波动,这被称为周内效应。本研究通过检验两个相互竞争的假设,调查了中国人在自由主义-保守主义方面的周内效应。根据认知状态假设,预计自由主义在周一较高,但由于工作日认知资源的消耗,到周五会逐渐下降。相比之下,情感状态假设则预测相反的情况,考虑到接近周末会带来更积极的情绪。两个假设都预测自由主义水平会在周末达到峰值。

方法

通过在线问卷《中国政治罗盘》(CPC)调查收集数据(n = 171,830),该调查包括50个项目,用于在三个领域(即政治、经济和社会)测量人们的自由主义-保守主义。

结果

结果显示,自由主义水平从周一到周三逐渐下降,从周三到周五反弹,并在周末达到峰值。

讨论

这种V形模式表明,自由主义-保守主义的周内波动可能源于认知和情感过程的协同作用,而不是单独的某一个。这些发现对实践和政策制定具有重要意义,包括最近的四天工作制试点计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0036/9971015/2b85dc277de0/fpsyg-13-1074334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0036/9971015/62ebda449d53/fpsyg-13-1074334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0036/9971015/2b85dc277de0/fpsyg-13-1074334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0036/9971015/62ebda449d53/fpsyg-13-1074334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0036/9971015/2b85dc277de0/fpsyg-13-1074334-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The day-of-week (DOW) effect on liberalism-conservatism: Evidence from a large-scale online survey in China.一周中的日期对自由主义-保守主义的影响:来自中国大规模在线调查的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 14;13:1074334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074334. eCollection 2022.
2
Neural Correlates of Liberalism and Conservatism in a Post-communist Country.后共产主义国家中自由主义和保守主义的神经关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Apr 12;13:119. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00119. eCollection 2019.
3
Sensitive liberals and unfeeling conservatives? .敏感的自由派和麻木不仁的保守派?
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Mar;41(2):256-275. doi: 10.1017/pls.2022.18.
4
INFORMATION LEVEL AND DIMENSIONALITY OF LIBERALISM-CONSERVATISM.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1973 Jan 1;8(2):195-212. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0802_3.
5
Sexual Liberalism-Conservatism: the effect of human values, gender, and previous sexual experience.性自由-保守主义:人类价值观、性别和以往性经验的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Aug;41(4):1027-39. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9936-4. Epub 2012 May 8.
6
Metamorphoses of Political Neoliberalism.政治新自由主义的蜕变
Her Russ Acad Sci. 2020;90(6):645-652. doi: 10.1134/S1019331620060064. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Political Hearts of Darkness: The Dark Triad as Predictors of Political Orientations and Interest in Politics.《政治的黑暗之心:黑暗三性格特质作为政治取向和政治兴趣的预测指标》
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;11(12):169. doi: 10.3390/bs11120169.
8
Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values.富有同情心的自由派和彬彬有礼的保守派:宜人性与政治意识形态和道德价值观的关联。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 May;36(5):655-64. doi: 10.1177/0146167210366854. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
9
Societal threat, authoritarianism, conservatism, and U.S. state death penalty sentencing (1977-2004).社会威胁、威权主义、保守主义与美国各州的死刑判决(1977 - 2004年)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):913-23. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.913.
10
Genes, Culture and Conservatism-A Psychometric-Genetic Approach.《基因、文化与保守主义——一种心理测量遗传学方法》
Behav Genet. 2016 Jul;46(4):516-28. doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9768-9. Epub 2015 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediating Effects of Academic Self-Efficacy and Depressive Symptoms on Prosocial/Antisocial Behavior Among Youths.学术自我效能感和抑郁症状对青少年亲社会/反社会行为的中介作用。
Prev Sci. 2024 Jul;25(5):711-723. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01611-4. Epub 2023 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Small Effects: The Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science.微小效应:累积性心理科学不可或缺的基础
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):205-215. doi: 10.1177/1745691620984483. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
2
The role of dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in the processing of emotional dimensions.背外侧前额叶皮质和腹内侧前额叶皮质在情绪维度加工中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81454-7.
3
Within-person day-of-week effects on affective and evaluative/cognitive well-being among Koreans.
韩国人情绪和评价/认知幸福感的个体日内周效应。
Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):1114-1118. doi: 10.1037/emo0000930. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
In a World of Big Data, Small Effects Can Still Matter: A Reply to Boyce, Daly, Hounkpatin, and Wood (2017).在大数据的世界里,微小的效应仍然至关重要:对博伊斯、戴利、洪克帕廷和伍德(2017年)的回应
Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):547-550. doi: 10.1177/0956797617697445. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
Mining big data to extract patterns and predict real-life outcomes.挖掘大数据以提取模式并预测现实生活结果。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Dec;21(4):493-506. doi: 10.1037/met0000105.
6
Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour.风险承受能力和投票行为的每周波动
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159017. eCollection 2016.
7
Models of Affective Decision Making: How Do Feelings Predict Choice?情感决策模型:情感如何预测选择?
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;27(6):763-75. doi: 10.1177/0956797616634654. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
Mental Representations of Weekdays.工作日的心理表征
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134555. eCollection 2015.
9
Whole Trait Theory.整体特质理论
J Res Pers. 2015 Jun 1;56:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.
10
Temporally dissociable mechanisms of self-control: early attentional filtering versus late value modulation.自我控制的时间分离机制:早期注意力过滤与晚期价值调节。
J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 27;33(48):18917-31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5816-12.2013.