• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已确诊冠心病患者抗血栓治疗策略12个月内及以后的疗效与安全性:欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)、欧洲急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)和欧洲预防心脏病学协会(EAPC)2022年联合临床共识声明的两项配套网状Meta分析

Within and beyond 12-month efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies in patients with established coronary artery disease: two companion network meta-analyses of the 2022 joint clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC).

作者信息

Navarese Eliano Pio, Landi Antonio, Oliva Angelo, Piccolo Raffaele, Aboyans Victor, Angiolillo Dominick, Atar Dan, Capodanno Davide, Fox Keith A A, Halvorsen Sigrun, James Stefan, Jüni Peter, Kunadian Vijay, Leonardi Sergio, Mehran Roxana, Montalescot Gilles, Niebauer Josef, Price Susanna, Storey Robert F, Völler Heinz, Vranckx Pascal, Windecker Stephan, Valgimigli Marco

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

SIRIO MEDICINE Research Network, Poland.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Apr 10;9(3):271-290. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad016.

DOI:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad016
PMID:36869784
Abstract

AIMS

To appraise all available antithrombotic treatments within or after 12 months following coronary revascularization and/or acute coronary syndrome in two network meta-analyses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-three (N = 189 261 patients) trials within 12 months and 19 (N = 139 086 patients) trials beyond 12 months were included for efficacy/safety endpoints appraisal. Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg bis in die (b.i.d.) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.88], aspirin and ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), or aspirin, clopidogrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) were the only treatments associated with lower cardiovascular mortality, compared with aspirin and clopidogrel, without or with greater bleeding risk for the first and the other treatment options, respectively. Beyond 12 months, no strategy lowered mortality; compared with aspirin; the greatest reductions of myocardial infarction (MI) were found with aspirin and clopidogrel (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85) or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61-0.95), especially ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.92), and of stroke with VKA (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76) or aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76). All treatments increased bleeding except P2Y12 monotherapy, compared with aspirin.

CONCLUSION

Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg monotherapy was the only treatment associated with lower mortality, without bleeding risk trade-off compared with aspirin and clopidogrel. Beyond 12 months, P2Y12 monotherapy, especially ticagrelor 90 mg, was associated with lower MI without bleeding trade-off; aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg most effectively reduced stroke, with a more acceptable bleeding risk than VKA, compared with aspirin.Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifiers: CRD42021243985 and CRD42021252398.

摘要

目的

在两项网状荟萃分析中评估冠状动脉血运重建和/或急性冠状动脉综合征后12个月内或之后的所有可用抗血栓治疗。

方法与结果

纳入43项(N = 189261例患者)12个月内的试验和19项(N = 139086例患者)12个月后的试验,用于疗效/安全性终点评估。在12个月内,与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛90毫克每日两次(b.i.d.)[风险比(HR),0.66;95%置信区间(CI),0.49 - 0.88]、阿司匹林和替格瑞洛90毫克(HR,0.85;95% CI,0.76 - 0.95)或阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和利伐沙班2.5毫克b.i.d.(HR,0.66;95% CI,0.51 - 0.86)是仅有的与较低心血管死亡率相关的治疗方法,第一种和其他治疗方案分别没有或有更高的出血风险。在12个月后,没有策略能降低死亡率;与阿司匹林相比,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷(HR,0.68;95% CI,0.55 - 0.85)或P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗(HR,0.76;95% CI:0.61 - 0.95),尤其是替格瑞洛90毫克(HR,0.54;95% CI,0.32 - 0.92),对心肌梗死(MI)的降低幅度最大,而维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)(HR,0.56;95% CI,0.44 - 0.76)或阿司匹林和利伐沙班2.5毫克(HR,0.58;95% CI,0.44 - 0.76)对中风的降低幅度最大。与阿司匹林相比,除P2Y12单药治疗外,所有治疗均增加出血风险。

结论

在12个月内,替格瑞洛90毫克单药治疗是唯一与较低死亡率相关的治疗方法,与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷相比无出血风险权衡。在12个月后,P2Y12单药治疗,尤其是替格瑞洛90毫克,与较低的MI相关且无出血权衡;与阿司匹林相比,阿司匹林和利伐沙班2.5毫克最有效地降低了中风风险,且出血风险比VKA更可接受。

注册网址

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/;唯一标识符:CRD42021243985和CRD42021252398 。

相似文献

1
Within and beyond 12-month efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies in patients with established coronary artery disease: two companion network meta-analyses of the 2022 joint clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC).已确诊冠心病患者抗血栓治疗策略12个月内及以后的疗效与安全性:欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)、欧洲急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)和欧洲预防心脏病学协会(EAPC)2022年联合临床共识声明的两项配套网状Meta分析
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Apr 10;9(3):271-290. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad016.
2
Prophylactic Efficacy and Safety of Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients with Stable Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (S-ASCVD): A Bayesian Network Meta-Regression Analysis.稳定型动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(S-ASCVD)患者抗栓治疗方案的预防疗效和安全性:贝叶斯网络荟萃回归分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 May;23(3):257-267. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00574-9. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Comparison efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs in chronic coronary syndromes patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较不同抗血小板或抗凝药物在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36429. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036429.
4
Antithrombotic Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.抗栓治疗症状性外周动脉疾病:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2022 Aug;82(12):1287-1302. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01756-6. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Network Meta-Analysis of 52 816 Patients From 12 Randomized Trials.比较口服 P2Y 抑制剂在急性冠状动脉综合征中的疗效和安全性:来自 12 项随机试验的 52816 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):150-160. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046786. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
P2Y inhibitor or aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用P2Y抑制剂或阿司匹林:随机临床试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析
BMJ. 2025 Jun 4;389:e082561. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082561.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.长期抗血栓策略在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e019184. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019184. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
Preferred monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗后优选单药治疗:随机试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Cardiol. 2024 May;83(5):338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
Impact of clopidogrel and potent P2Y 12 -inhibitors on mortality and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氯吡格雷和强效 P2Y12 抑制剂对急性冠脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的死亡率和卒中的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;109(1):93-101. doi: 10.1160/TH12-06-0377. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
10
Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后的短期双联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Dec 1;9(12):1094-1105. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216.

引用本文的文献

1
Position Statement on Antiplatelet Therapy for East Asians With Coronary Artery Disease: 2025 Update.《2025年东亚冠状动脉疾病患者抗血小板治疗立场声明更新版》
JACC Asia. 2025 Jul;5(7):821-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.010.
2
Ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high ischaemic risk: a post hoc analysis of the TWILIGHT trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林用于慢性冠状动脉综合征且缺血风险高的患者:TWILIGHT试验的事后分析
EuroIntervention. 2025 May 16;21(10):550-559. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00973.
3
Bleeding and thrombosis.
出血与血栓形成。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 May 2;11(3):211-212. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf017.
4
Insights on DAPT Abbreviation and De-escalation from ULTIMATE-DAPT and Related Trials: Are we Heading Toward an Aspirin-Free Strategy?来自ULTIMATE-DAPT及相关试验对双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)缩写和降阶梯治疗的见解:我们正朝着无阿司匹林策略迈进吗?
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Mar 8. doi: 10.1007/s40256-025-00725-0.
5
Editorial: Short and long-term treatment options in patients with acute coronary syndrome.社论:急性冠状动脉综合征患者的短期和长期治疗选择
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 4;12:1563882. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1563882. eCollection 2025.
6
Individualising Antithrombotic Strategies for Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndromes.急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征的抗栓策略个体化
Interv Cardiol. 2024 May 14;19:e07. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.44. eCollection 2024.
7
Antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients with ACS: moving targets need more tailored treatments.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者的抗血小板治疗:不断变化的目标需要更具针对性的治疗。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Mar;57(3):358-360. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02942-3. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
8
DAPT guided by platelet function tests or genotyping after PCI: pros and cons.PCI术后血小板功能检测或基因分型指导下的双联抗血小板治疗:利弊
EuroIntervention. 2023 Sep 18;19(7):546-548. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00022.
9
Comparison of Different Chronic Maintenance Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.比较冠心病患者不同慢性维持性抗血栓策略的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Aug 17;2023:5446271. doi: 10.1155/2023/5446271. eCollection 2023.
10
Antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with established coronary atherosclerotic disease.稳定性冠心病患者的抗血栓治疗策略。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Jul 29;9(5):462-496. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad032.