• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Sodium Hypochlorite plus EDTA Compared with Peracetic Acid in Removing Smear Layer and Killing .次氯酸钠加乙二胺四乙酸与过氧乙酸在去除玷污层及杀菌方面的效果比较
Iran Endod J. 2019 Winter;14(1):56-62. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i1.22190.
2
Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.单根根管中光子引发光声流辅助冲洗与传统冲洗的抗菌效果及玷污层去除比较:一项体外研究
Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Aug;31(8):371-7. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3515. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
4
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Isolated or Interweaving EDTA with Sodium Hypochlorite.使用单独或交织的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)与次氯酸钠去除玷污层的扫描电子显微镜评估
Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):55-59. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.11.
5
Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions in Removing Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.不同根管冲洗液去除玷污层的效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 3;15(9):e44618. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44618. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.使用三种冲洗方案去除氢氧化钙后根管壁清洁度的扫描电子显微镜评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Jan 1;8(1):11-8.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal in Apical Third Using Four Different Irrigants With Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis.使用四种不同冲洗液并结合超声震荡对根尖三分之一处玷污层去除效果的比较评估:一项体外扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析
Cureus. 2022 Mar 14;14(3):e23142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23142. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An Study.四环素、酸与去污剂混合物、次氯酸钠、乙二胺四乙酸和葡萄糖酸洗必泰对玷污层的去除及抗菌作用的扫描电子显微镜评估:一项研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;8(1):62-69. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)应用时间对根管内玷污层去除的影响:扫描电子显微镜分析
Int Endod J. 2005 May;38(5):285-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00930.x.
10
Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite.使用被动超声冲洗和不同浓度次氯酸钠去除玷污层。
J Endod. 2020 Nov;46(11):1738-1744. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of radiotherapy, immediate dentin sealing and irrigation simulating single- or two-visits endodontic treatment on the bond strength to pulp chamber dentin: an in vitro study.放射治疗、模拟单次或两次就诊根管治疗的即刻牙本质封闭和冲洗对牙髓腔牙本质粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Odontology. 2025 Jan;113(1):261-273. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00971-9. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
2
Effect of Chitosan Irrigant and Lubricating Gel on Bond Strength of Resin Sealer to Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study.壳聚糖冲洗剂和润滑凝胶对树脂封闭剂与牙根牙本质粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 May 12;16(5):e60143. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60143. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study.根管预备的锥度和直径对根管清洁度的影响:扫描电镜研究。
Int Endod J. 2019 Mar;52(3):343-351. doi: 10.1111/iej.13002. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
2
Antimicrobial efficacy of 0.5% peracetic acid and EDTA with passive ultrasonic or manual agitation in an Enterococcus faecalis biofilm model.在粪肠球菌生物膜模型中,0.5%过氧乙酸和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)采用被动超声或手动搅拌时的抗菌效果。
Aust Endod J. 2019 Apr;45(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/aej.12279. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
3
Cleaning Efficacy of Root Canal Irrigation with Positive and Negative Pressure System.正负压力系统根管冲洗的清洁效果
Iran Endod J. 2018 Summer;13(3):398-402. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i3.20875.
4
Cytotoxicity assessment of 1% peracetic acid, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA on FG11 and FG15 human fibroblasts.1%过氧乙酸、2.5%次氯酸钠和17%乙二胺四乙酸对FG11和FG15人成纤维细胞的细胞毒性评估。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2018 Jun;31(1):11-15.
5
The Antifungal Effect of Propolis Endodontic Irrigant with Three Other Irrigation Solutions in Presence and Absence of Smear Layer: An Study.蜂胶牙髓冲洗剂与其他三种冲洗液在有无玷污层情况下的抗真菌作用:一项研究。
Iran Endod J. 2018 Spring;13(2):234-239. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i2.19227.
6
Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.不同根管冲洗和激活系统去除玷污层的效率:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Iran Endod J. 2017 Fall;12(4):414-418. doi: 10.22037/iej.v12i4.9571.
7
Antimicrobial effectiveness of combinations of oxidant and chelating agents in infected dentine: an ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy study.氧化剂和螯合剂组合在感染牙本质中的抗菌效果:体外共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。
Int Endod J. 2018 Apr;51(4):448-456. doi: 10.1111/iej.12863. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Effectiveness of Various Endodontic Irrigants on the Micro-Hardness of the Root Canal Dentin: An in vitro Study.不同根管冲洗剂对根管牙本质微硬度的影响:一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC01-ZC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24018.9472. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
9
Effect of final irrigation protocols on microhardness reduction and erosion of root canal dentin.最终冲洗方案对根管牙本质显微硬度降低及侵蚀的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 May 15;31:e40. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0040.
10
Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of and Extracts, Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite against .[提取物名称1]和[提取物名称2]提取物、洗必泰与次氯酸钠对[目标微生物名称]的抗菌效果比较
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):205-210. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.40.

次氯酸钠加乙二胺四乙酸与过氧乙酸在去除玷污层及杀菌方面的效果比较

Effectiveness of Sodium Hypochlorite plus EDTA Compared with Peracetic Acid in Removing Smear Layer and Killing .

作者信息

Grando Caroline Pietroski, Martinez Elizabeth Ferreira, Fontana Carlos Eduardo, Pedro Rocha Daniel Guimarães, Pessoa Stringheta Carolina, da Silveira Bueno Carlos Eduardo

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Department of Endodontics, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2019 Winter;14(1):56-62. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i1.22190.

DOI:10.22037/iej.v14i1.22190
PMID:36879593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9984824/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite associated with 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (NaOCl-EDTA), that of 1% peracetic acid (PA), in removing the smear layer, as assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and in exerting bactericidal action against ( as assessed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-five extracted mandibular single-rooted premolars were selected, and divided into two experimental groups (NaOCl-EDTA and PA; =25) and one control group (0.9% saline; =5). Pre- and post-instrumentation samples were collected and assessed for the presence of using real-time PCR. The teeth were instrumented using hand files and the ProTaper Universal system (hybrid technique) for a standardized time of 7 min. A total of 20 mL of NaOCl followed by 5 mL of EDTA were applied during instrumentation in the NaOCl-EDTA group, whereas 20 mL of PA and 20 mL of saline were applied in the PA and control groups, respectively. An additional 5 mL of saline was applied in all the groups to neutralize the environment. A scoring system was used to conduct the SEM assessment. The results were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis test, complemented by Dunn's test (SEM analysis) (<0.05).

RESULTS

A significant microbial reduction was observed in both the PA and the NaOCl-EDTA groups (<0.05). In the PA group, the presence of a smear layer in the apical third was significantly greater than in the cervical third (<0.05); no significant differences were observed between the middle and cervical thirds, or between the middle and apical thirds (>0.05). In the NaOCl-EDTA group, the smear layer scores were significantly higher in the apical third than in the cervical and middle thirds (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that there was no significant difference between PA and NaOCl-EDTA irrigation regimens regarding either antimicrobial action against or removal of the smear layer, except for greater removal in the middle third by the NaOCl-EDTA group.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估2.5%次氯酸钠与17%乙二胺四乙酸(NaOCl-EDTA)、1%过氧乙酸(PA)去除玷污层的效果,并通过实时聚合酶链反应(实时PCR)评估其对[具体细菌名称未给出]的杀菌作用。

方法与材料

选取55颗拔除的下颌单根前磨牙,分为两个实验组(NaOCl-EDTA组和PA组;每组25颗)和一个对照组(0.9%生理盐水组;5颗)。在器械操作前后采集样本,使用实时PCR检测[具体细菌名称未给出]的存在情况。使用手用锉和ProTaper Universal系统(混合技术)对牙齿进行器械操作,标准化时间为7分钟。在NaOCl-EDTA组器械操作过程中,共应用20 mL NaOCl,随后应用5 mL EDTA,而在PA组和对照组分别应用20 mL PA和20 mL生理盐水。所有组均额外应用5 mL生理盐水以中和环境。使用评分系统进行SEM评估。结果采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,并辅以Dunn检验(SEM分析)(P<0.05)。

结果

PA组和NaOCl-EDTA组均观察到显著的微生物减少(P<0.05)。在PA组中,根尖三分之一处玷污层的存在显著多于颈三分之一处(P<0.05);在中三分之一与颈三分之一之间,以及中三分之一与根尖三分之一之间未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。在NaOCl-EDTA组中,根尖三分之一处的玷污层评分显著高于颈三分之一和中三分之一处(P<0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,PA和NaOCl-EDTA冲洗方案在对[具体细菌名称未给出]的抗菌作用或玷污层去除方面没有显著差异,除了NaOCl-EDTA组在中三分之一处的去除效果更好。