Clinical, Partners In Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Clinical Services, Partners In Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2178604. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2178604.
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health services worldwide, which may have led to increased mortality and secondary disease outbreaks. Disruptions vary by patient population, geographic area, and service. While many reasons have been put forward to explain disruptions, few studies have empirically investigated their causes.
We quantify disruptions to outpatient services, facility-based deliveries, and family planning in seven low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic and quantify relationships between disruptions and the intensity of national pandemic responses.
We leveraged routine data from 104 Partners In Health-supported facilities from January 2016 to December 2021. We first quantified COVID-19-related disruptions in each country by month using negative binomial time series models. We then modelled the relationship between disruptions and the intensity of national pandemic responses, as measured by the stringency index from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker.
For all the studied countries, we observed at least one month with a significant decline in outpatient visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also observed significant cumulative drops in outpatient visits across all months in Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. A significant cumulative decrease in facility-based deliveries was observed in Haiti, Lesotho, Mexico, and Sierra Leone. No country had significant cumulative drops in family planning visits. For a 10-unit increase in the average monthly stringency index, the proportion deviation in monthly facility outpatient visits compared to expected fell by 3.9% (95% CI: -5.1%, -1.6%). No relationship between stringency of pandemic responses and utilisation was observed for facility-based deliveries or family planning.
Context-specific strategies show the ability of health systems to sustain essential health services during the pandemic. The link between pandemic responses and healthcare utilisation can inform purposeful strategies to ensure communities have access to care and provide lessons for promoting the utilisation of health services elsewhere.
COVID-19 大流行扰乱了全球卫生服务,这可能导致死亡率上升和继发疾病爆发。中断因患者人群、地理区域和服务而有所不同。虽然提出了许多解释中断的原因,但很少有研究从实证角度调查其原因。
我们量化了七个中低收入国家在 COVID-19 大流行期间门诊服务、基于设施的分娩和计划生育服务的中断情况,并量化了中断与国家大流行应对强度之间的关系。
我们利用了来自 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间 104 个合作伙伴健康支持机构的常规数据。我们首先使用负二项式时间序列模型按月量化每个国家与 COVID-19 相关的中断情况。然后,我们根据牛津 COVID-19 政府应对跟踪器的严格指数来衡量国家大流行应对强度,建立了中断与应对强度之间的关系模型。
对于所有研究国家,我们观察到 COVID-19 大流行期间至少有一个月门诊就诊量显著下降。我们还观察到莱索托、利比里亚、马拉维、卢旺达和塞拉利昂所有月份门诊就诊量的累计显著下降。海地、莱索托、墨西哥和塞拉利昂的基于设施的分娩量显著减少。没有国家的计划生育就诊量出现显著累计下降。平均每月严格指数增加 10 个单位,与预期相比,每月设施门诊就诊量的比例偏差下降 3.9%(95%CI:-5.1%,-1.6%)。在基于设施的分娩或计划生育方面,没有观察到大流行应对力度与利用率之间的关系。
具体情况的策略表明卫生系统在大流行期间维持基本卫生服务的能力。大流行应对与医疗保健利用之间的联系可以为确保社区获得医疗服务提供有针对性的策略,并为其他地方促进医疗服务利用提供经验教训。