• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测脓毒症患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险的预测模型:一项回顾性队列研究。

A prediction model for predicting the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Emergency Department, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.299 Qingyang Road, Wuxi, 214023, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.

University of California, Santa Cruz, 95064, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02365-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12890-023-02365-z
PMID:36890503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9994387/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of death in sepsis patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was as high as 20-50%. Few studies focused on the risk identification of ARDS among sepsis patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the ARDS risk in sepsis patients based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database.

METHODS

A total of 16,523 sepsis patients were included and randomly divided into the training and testing sets with a ratio of 7:3 in this retrospective cohort study. The outcomes were defined as the occurrence of ARDS for ICU patients with sepsis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used in the training set to identify the factors that were associated with ARDS risk, which were adopted to establish the nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves were used to assess the predictive performance of nomogram.

RESULTS

Totally 2422 (20.66%) sepsis patients occurred ARDS, with the median follow-up time of 8.47 (5.20, 16.20) days. The results found that body mass index, respiratory rate, urine output, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, blood urea nitrogen, vasopressin, continuous renal replacement therapy, ventilation status, chronic pulmonary disease, malignant cancer, liver disease, septic shock and pancreatitis might be predictors. The area under the curve of developed model were 0.811 (95% CI 0.802-0.820) in the training set and 0.812 (95% CI 0.798-0.826) in the testing set. The calibration curve showed a good concordance between the predicted and observed ARDS among sepsis patients.

CONCLUSION

We developed a model incorporating thirteen clinical features to predict the ARDS risk in patients with sepsis. The model showed a good predictive ability by internal validation.

摘要

背景

患有急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的脓毒症患者的死亡率高达 20-50%。很少有研究关注脓毒症患者中 ARDS 的风险识别。本研究旨在基于医疗信息集市重症监护 IV 数据库开发和验证一种预测脓毒症患者 ARDS 风险的列线图。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入 16523 例脓毒症患者,并将其随机分为训练集和测试集,比例为 7:3。该研究的结局定义为 ICU 脓毒症患者发生 ARDS。在训练集中,使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来识别与 ARDS 风险相关的因素,并采用这些因素来建立列线图。使用接受者操作特征和校准曲线来评估列线图的预测性能。

结果

共有 2422(20.66%)例脓毒症患者发生 ARDS,中位随访时间为 8.47(5.20,16.20)天。结果发现,体重指数、呼吸频率、尿量、二氧化碳分压、血尿素氮、血管加压素、连续肾脏替代治疗、通气状态、慢性肺部疾病、恶性肿瘤、肝脏疾病、脓毒性休克和胰腺炎可能是预测因素。在训练集中,开发模型的曲线下面积为 0.811(95%CI 0.802-0.820),在测试集中为 0.812(95%CI 0.798-0.826)。校准曲线显示,预测的脓毒症患者 ARDS 与观察到的 ARDS 之间具有良好的一致性。

结论

我们开发了一种包含 13 个临床特征的模型,用于预测脓毒症患者的 ARDS 风险。内部验证表明,该模型具有良好的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/2ed23ec41613/12890_2023_2365_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/1ad9f9a66d2a/12890_2023_2365_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/d7c8ec46b601/12890_2023_2365_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/3b7b94414864/12890_2023_2365_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/25c468d66101/12890_2023_2365_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/2ed23ec41613/12890_2023_2365_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/1ad9f9a66d2a/12890_2023_2365_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/d7c8ec46b601/12890_2023_2365_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/3b7b94414864/12890_2023_2365_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/25c468d66101/12890_2023_2365_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/9996906/2ed23ec41613/12890_2023_2365_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A prediction model for predicting the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study.预测脓毒症患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险的预测模型:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02365-z.
2
Combination of transcriptional biomarkers and clinical parameters for early prediction of sepsis indued acute respiratory distress syndrome.转录生物标志物与临床参数联合用于早期预测脓毒症诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1084568. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1084568. eCollection 2022.
3
[Establishment and verification of LIPS score combined with APACHE II score and oxygenation index to predict the occurrence model of ARDS].[建立LIPS评分联合APACHE II评分及氧合指数预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征发生模型并验证]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Oct;34(10):1048-1054. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220930-00883.
4
[Predictive value of machine learning for in-hospital mortality for trauma-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: an analysis using the data from MIMIC III].[机器学习对创伤性急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者院内死亡率的预测价值:基于MIMIC III数据的分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Mar;34(3):260-264. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20211117-01741.
5
[Establishment of a predictive model for acute respiratory distress syndrome and analysis of its predictive value in critical burn patients].[建立急性呼吸窘迫综合征预测模型并分析其在重症烧伤患者中的预测价值]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 20;37(4):333-339. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200301-00109.
6
Development of a predictive nomogram for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with acute pancreatitis complicated with acute kidney injury.开发一种用于预测急性胰腺炎合并急性肾损伤患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的列线图。
Ren Fail. 2023;45(2):2251591. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2251591. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Suffering from Septic Shock.构建和验证脓毒性休克患者急性肾损伤风险预测模型。
Dis Markers. 2022 Jan 6;2022:9367873. doi: 10.1155/2022/9367873. eCollection 2022.
8
A dynamic nomogram for predicting 28-day mortality in septic shock: a Chinese retrospective cohort study.用于预测感染性休克患者28天死亡率的动态列线图:一项中国回顾性队列研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 23;12:e16723. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16723. eCollection 2024.
9
Development and external validation of models to predict acute respiratory distress syndrome related to severe acute pancreatitis.预测与重症急性胰腺炎相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征的模型的开发和外部验证。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 May 21;28(19):2123-2136. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i19.2123.
10
A predictive model for the risk of sepsis within 30 days of admission in patients with traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit: a retrospective analysis based on MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的 ICU 创伤性脑损伤患者入院后 30 天内脓毒症风险的预测模型:回顾性分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Aug 18;28(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01255-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A nomogram for individualized prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.用于严重创伤性脑损伤患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征个体化预测的列线图:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03879-4.
2
Development and validation of a predictive model for invasive ventilation risk within 48 hours of admission in patients with early sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.早期脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤患者入院48小时内有创通气风险预测模型的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 18;12:1577154. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1577154. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法预测创伤性脑损伤患者的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 15;59(1):171. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010171.
2
A prediction model for acute respiratory distress syndrome among patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective analysis.预测严重急性胰腺炎患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的模型:一项回顾性分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;16:17534666221122592. doi: 10.1177/17534666221122592.
3
Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis patients: a retrospective study from a tertiary hospital in China.
A prediction model for 30-day mortality in patients with ARDS admitted to the intensive care unit.
重症监护病房收治的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者30天死亡率的预测模型。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jul 2;30(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02838-3.
4
Bio inspired feature selection and graph learning for sepsis risk stratification.用于脓毒症风险分层的生物启发式特征选择与图学习
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02889-w.
5
Development and validation of a Nomogram for the prediction of patients with sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.用于预测脓毒症诱导的多器官功能障碍综合征患者的列线图的开发与验证
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):1036-1046. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.10421.
6
Predicting mortality and risk factors of sepsis related ARDS using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型预测脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的死亡率及风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96501-w.
7
Derivation and Validation of a Clinical and Endothelial Biomarker Risk Model to Predict Persistent Pediatric Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Dysfunction.用于预测小儿持续性脓毒症相关急性呼吸功能障碍的临床和内皮生物标志物风险模型的推导与验证
CHEST Crit Care. 2025 Mar;3(1). doi: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100120. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
8
Early Prediction of ICU Mortality in Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Using Machine Learning: The MEMORIAL Study.使用机器学习对急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的重症监护病房死亡率进行早期预测:纪念研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):1711. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051711.
9
Dynamic Immune Indicator Changes as Predictors of ARDS in ICU Patients with Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.动态免疫指标变化作为脓毒症重症监护病房患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预测指标:一项回顾性研究
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Mar 1;18:1163-1172. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S501252. eCollection 2025.
10
Autophagy-related biomarkers identified in sepsis-induced ARDS through bioinformatics analysis.通过生物信息学分析在脓毒症诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征中鉴定出的自噬相关生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;15(1):7864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92409-7.
脓毒症患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素:中国一家三甲医院的回顾性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02015-w.
4
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Coronavirus-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.预测冠状病毒相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险的列线图的开发与验证:一项回顾性队列研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 May 2;15:2371-2381. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S348278. eCollection 2022.
5
Risk factor analysis and nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis and lung infection.预测脓毒症合并肺部感染ICU患者院内死亡率的危险因素分析及列线图
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01809-8.
6
Plasma Anion Gap and Risk of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Analysis from the MIMIC-IV Database.急性缺血性卒中患者的血浆阴离子间隙与院内死亡风险:来自MIMIC-IV数据库的分析
J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 4;11(10):1004. doi: 10.3390/jpm11101004.
7
A Nomogram to Predict Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Cardiac Surgery.一种预测心脏手术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的列线图。
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 May 21;24(3):E445-E450. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3809.
8
Does an increase in serum FGF21 level predict 28-day mortality of critical patients with sepsis and ARDS?血清 FGF21 水平升高能否预测脓毒症合并 ARDS 危重症患者 28 天死亡率?
Respir Res. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01778-w.
9
Prognostic Value of the Red Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Sepsis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.红细胞分布宽度对脓毒症相关性急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Dis Markers. 2021 Jun 2;2021:5543822. doi: 10.1155/2021/5543822. eCollection 2021.
10
Development and Validation of a Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of Extubation Failure in Intensive Care Units.重症监护病房拔管失败预测机器学习模型的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 17;8:676343. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.676343. eCollection 2021.