Zhou Ben-Gang, Mei Yu-Zhou, Wang Jing-Shu, Xia Jian-Lei, Jiang Xin, Ju Sheng-Yong, Ding Yan-Bing
Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Feb 13;14:20406223231155119. doi: 10.1177/20406223231155119. eCollection 2023.
Recent observational studies have investigated the association between () infection and pancreatic cancer with conflicting data. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential association.
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) from inception to 30 August 2022. The summary results as odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled by generic inverse variance method based on random-effects model.
A total of 20 observational studies involving 67,718 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of data from 12 case-control studies and 5 nested case-control studies showed that there was no significant association between infection and the risk of pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.95-1.51, = 0.13). Similarly, we also did not find significant association between cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) positive strains, CagA negative strains, vacuolating cytotoxin gene A (VacA) positive strains infection, and the risk of pancreatic cancer. Meta-analysis of data from three cohort studies showed that infection was not significantly associated with an increased risk of incident pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.65-2.42, = 0.50).
We found insufficient evidence to support the proposed association between infection and increased risk of pancreatic cancer. To better understand any association, future evidence from large, well-designed, high-quality prospective cohort studies that accounts for diverse ethnic populations, certain strains, and confounding factors would be useful to settle this controversy.
近期的观察性研究对()感染与胰腺癌之间的关联进行了调查,但数据相互矛盾。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估潜在的关联。
这是一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们检索了从数据库建立至2022年8月30日的三个数据库(PubMed、Embase和Web of Science)。基于随机效应模型,采用通用逆方差法汇总以比值比(OR)或风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示的汇总结果。
荟萃分析共纳入20项涉及67718名参与者的观察性研究。对12项病例对照研究和5项巢式病例对照研究的数据进行的荟萃分析表明,()感染与胰腺癌风险之间无显著关联(OR = 1.20,95%CI = 0.95 - 1.51,P = 0.13)。同样,我们也未发现细胞毒素相关基因A(CagA)阳性菌株、CagA阴性菌株、空泡毒素基因A(VacA)阳性菌株感染与胰腺癌风险之间存在显著关联。对三项队列研究的数据进行的荟萃分析表明,()感染与胰腺癌发病风险增加无显著关联(HR = 1.26,95%CI = 0.65 - 2.42,P = 0.50)。
我们发现证据不足,无法支持所提出的()感染与胰腺癌风险增加之间的关联。为了更好地理解任何关联,未来来自大型、设计良好、高质量的前瞻性队列研究的证据,考虑到不同种族人群、某些()菌株和混杂因素,将有助于解决这一争议。