• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习加速中东碳酸盐储层核磁孔隙度反演方法

Machine learning accelerated approach to infer nuclear magnetic resonance porosity for a middle eastern carbonate reservoir.

机构信息

Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.

Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 9;13(1):3956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30708-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-30708-7
PMID:36894553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9998858/
Abstract

Carbonate rocks present a complicated pore system owing to the existence of intra-particle and interparticle porosities. Therefore, characterization of carbonate rocks using petrophysical data is a challenging task. Conventional neutron, sonic, and neutron-density porosities are proven to be less accurate as compared to the NMR porosity. This study aims to predict the NMR porosity by implementing three different machine learning (ML) algorithms using conventional well logs including neutron-porosity, sonic, resistivity, gamma ray, and photoelectric factor. Data, comprising 3500 data points, was acquired from a vast carbonate petroleum reservoir in the Middle East. The input parameters were selected based on their relative importance with respect to output parameter. Three ML techniques such as adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), artificial neural network (ANN), and functional network (FN) were implemented for the development of prediction models. The model's accuracy was evaluated by correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE), and average absolute percentage error (AAPE). The results demonstrated that all three prediction models are reliable and consistent exhibiting low errors and high 'R' values for both training and testing prediction when related to actual dataset. However, the performance of ANN model was better as compared to other two studied ML techniques based on minimum AAPE and RMSE errors (5.12 and 0.39) and highest R (0.95) for testing and validation outcome. The AAPE and RMSE for the testing and validation results were found to be 5.38 and 0.41 for ANFIS and 6.06 and 0.48 for FN model, respectively. The ANFIS and FN models exhibited 'R' 0.937 and 0.942, for testing and validation dataset, respectively. Based on testing and validation results, ANFIS and FN models have been ranked second and third after ANN. Further, optimized ANN and FN models were used to extract explicit correlations to compute the NMR porosity. Hence, this study reveals the successful applications of ML techniques for the accurate prediction of NMR porosity.

摘要

碳酸盐岩由于存在颗粒内和颗粒间孔隙,因此呈现出复杂的孔隙系统。因此,使用岩石物理数据对碳酸盐岩进行特征描述是一项具有挑战性的任务。与 NMR 孔隙度相比,传统的中子、声波和中子密度孔隙度已被证明不太准确。本研究旨在通过使用常规测井(包括中子孔隙度、声波、电阻率、伽马射线和光电因子)中的三种不同机器学习 (ML) 算法来预测 NMR 孔隙度。数据来自中东一个大型碳酸盐岩石油储层,共采集了 3500 个数据点。输入参数是根据它们与输出参数的相对重要性选择的。使用三种 ML 技术,即自适应神经模糊推理系统 (ANFIS)、人工神经网络 (ANN) 和功能网络 (FN),为开发预测模型。通过相关系数 (R)、均方根误差 (RMSE) 和平均绝对百分比误差 (AAPE) 评估模型的准确性。结果表明,所有三种预测模型都具有较高的准确性和一致性,与实际数据集相关时,无论是训练还是测试预测,均表现出较低的误差和较高的 R 值。然而,与其他两种研究的 ML 技术相比,ANN 模型的性能更好,基于最小的 AAPE 和 RMSE 误差(5.12 和 0.39)和最高的 R(0.95),用于测试和验证结果。ANFIS 和 FN 模型在测试和验证结果中的 AAPE 和 RMSE 分别为 5.38 和 0.41,6.06 和 0.48。ANFIS 和 FN 模型在测试和验证数据集的 R 分别为 0.937 和 0.942。基于测试和验证结果,ANN 模型排名第一,ANFIS 和 FN 模型分别排名第二和第三。此外,还优化了 ANN 和 FN 模型以提取明确的相关性,从而计算 NMR 孔隙度。因此,本研究表明,机器学习技术可成功应用于准确预测 NMR 孔隙度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/7ee0c9da3843/41598_2023_30708_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/9eda39b2c611/41598_2023_30708_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/8f586c1f04d2/41598_2023_30708_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/1d0d3bf04b63/41598_2023_30708_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/9d75b0780e68/41598_2023_30708_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/43a0fed472be/41598_2023_30708_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/6d04a0a64d28/41598_2023_30708_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/e4663e629e9d/41598_2023_30708_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/f4a0a709f133/41598_2023_30708_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/6603ef5fd93f/41598_2023_30708_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/029570ebaf78/41598_2023_30708_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/da98888866c5/41598_2023_30708_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/978f1717f4d2/41598_2023_30708_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/634d173fea3f/41598_2023_30708_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/7ee0c9da3843/41598_2023_30708_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/9eda39b2c611/41598_2023_30708_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/8f586c1f04d2/41598_2023_30708_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/1d0d3bf04b63/41598_2023_30708_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/9d75b0780e68/41598_2023_30708_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/43a0fed472be/41598_2023_30708_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/6d04a0a64d28/41598_2023_30708_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/e4663e629e9d/41598_2023_30708_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/f4a0a709f133/41598_2023_30708_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/6603ef5fd93f/41598_2023_30708_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/029570ebaf78/41598_2023_30708_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/da98888866c5/41598_2023_30708_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/978f1717f4d2/41598_2023_30708_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/634d173fea3f/41598_2023_30708_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/723e/9998858/7ee0c9da3843/41598_2023_30708_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning accelerated approach to infer nuclear magnetic resonance porosity for a middle eastern carbonate reservoir.机器学习加速中东碳酸盐储层核磁孔隙度反演方法
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 9;13(1):3956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30708-7.
2
Real-Time Prediction of Rate of Penetration in S-Shape Well Profile Using Artificial Intelligence Models.利用人工智能模型实时预测 S 形井眼剖面中的钻进速度。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 21;20(12):3506. doi: 10.3390/s20123506.
3
Machine learning application to predict in-situ stresses from logging data.基于测井数据的原位应力预测的机器学习应用
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02959-9.
4
Prediction of Water Saturation in Tight Gas Sandstone Formation Using Artificial Intelligence.利用人工智能预测致密气砂岩地层中的含水饱和度
ACS Omega. 2022 Jan 3;7(1):215-222. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04416. eCollection 2022 Jan 11.
5
Estimation of pore structure and permeability in tight carbonate reservoir based on machine learning (ML) algorithm using SEM images of Jaisalmer sub-basin, India.基于机器学习(ML)算法,利用印度斋沙默尔次盆地的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像估算致密碳酸盐岩储层的孔隙结构和渗透率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51479-9.
6
Intelligent Prediction for Rock Porosity While Drilling Complex Lithology in Real Time.实时智能预测复杂岩性钻进过程中的岩石孔隙度
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Jun 14;2021:9960478. doi: 10.1155/2021/9960478. eCollection 2021.
7
Prediction of evaporation from dam reservoirs under climate change using soft computing techniques.利用软计算技术预测气候变化下大坝水库的蒸发量
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(10):27912-27935. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23899-5. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
8
Comparison of ANFIS and ANN modeling for predicting the water absorption behavior of polyurethane treated polyester fabric.用于预测聚氨酯处理聚酯织物吸水行为的自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)与人工神经网络(ANN)建模比较
Heliyon. 2021 Sep 15;7(9):e08000. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08000. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Predicting coagulation-flocculation process for turbidity removal from water using graphene oxide: a comparative study on ANN, SVR, ANFIS, and RSM models.使用氧化石墨烯预测水的浊度去除的混凝过程:人工神经网络、支持向量机、自适应神经模糊推理系统和响应面模型的比较研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(48):72839-72852. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20989-2. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Quantitative Forecasting of Malaria Parasite Using Machine Learning Models: MLR, ANN, ANFIS and Random Forest.使用机器学习模型(MLR、ANN、ANFIS和随机森林)对疟原虫进行定量预测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;14(4):385. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040385.

引用本文的文献

1
Mining Technology Evaluation for Steep Coal Seams Based on a GA-BP Neural Network.基于遗传算法-反向传播神经网络的急倾斜煤层开采技术评价
ACS Omega. 2024 May 31;9(23):25309-25321. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c03167. eCollection 2024 Jun 11.
2
Reservoir rock typing assessment in a coal-tight sand based heterogeneous geological formation through advanced AI methods.通过先进人工智能方法对基于致密砂岩的非均质地质构造中的储层岩石进行类型评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5659. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55250-y.
3
Research Advances in Machine Learning Techniques in Gas Hydrate Applications.
机器学习技术在天然气水合物应用中的研究进展
ACS Omega. 2024 Jan 19;9(4):4210-4228. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04825. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
4
Estimation of pore structure and permeability in tight carbonate reservoir based on machine learning (ML) algorithm using SEM images of Jaisalmer sub-basin, India.基于机器学习(ML)算法,利用印度斋沙默尔次盆地的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像估算致密碳酸盐岩储层的孔隙结构和渗透率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51479-9.
5
Artificial intelligence-based framework for precise prediction of asphaltene particle aggregation kinetics in petroleum recovery.基于人工智能的石油采收中沥青质颗粒聚集动力学精确预测框架
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 28;13(1):18525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45685-0.