• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定用于呼吸样本分类鉴定的最准确的 16S rRNA 高变区。

Determining the most accurate 16S rRNA hypervariable region for taxonomic identification from respiratory samples.

机构信息

Cellex Laboratory, CibeRes (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, 06/06/0028), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.

School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 9;13(1):3974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30764-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-30764-z
PMID:36894603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9998635/
Abstract

16S rRNA gene profiling, which contains nine hypervariable regions (V1-V9), is the gold standard for identifying taxonomic units by high-throughput sequencing. Microbiome studies combine two or more region sequences (usually V3-V4) to increase the resolving power for identifying bacterial taxa. We compare the resolving powers of V1-V2, V3-V4, V5-V7, and V7-V9 to improve microbiome analyses in sputum samples from patients with chronic respiratory diseases. DNA were isolated from 33 human sputum samples, and libraries were created using a QIASeq screening panel intended for Illumina platforms (16S/ITS; Qiagen Hilden, Germany). The analysis included a mock community as a microbial standard control (ZymoBIOMICS). We used the Deblur algorithm to identify bacterial amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) at the genus level. Alpha diversity was significantly higher for V1-V2, V3-V4, and V5-V7 compared with V7-V9, and significant compositional dissimilarities in the V1-V2 and V7-V9 analyses versus the V3-V4 and V5-V7 analyses. A cladogram confirmed these compositional differences, with the latter two being very similar in composition. The combined hypervariable regions showed significant differences when discriminating between the relative abundances of bacterial genera. The area under the curve revealed that V1-V2 had the highest resolving power for accurately identifying respiratory bacterial taxa from sputum samples. Our study confirms that 16S rRNA hypervariable regions provide significant differences for taxonomic identification in sputum. Comparing the taxa of microbial community standard control with the taxa samples, V1-V2 combination exhibits the most sensitivity and specificity. Thus, while third generation full-length 16S rRNA sequencing platforms become more available, the V1-V2 hypervariable regions can be used for taxonomic identification in sputum.

摘要

16S rRNA 基因谱分析,其中包含九个高变区(V1-V9),是通过高通量测序识别分类单元的金标准。微生物组研究结合两个或更多区域序列(通常为 V3-V4),以提高识别细菌分类群的分辨率。我们比较了 V1-V2、V3-V4、V5-V7 和 V7-V9 的分辨率,以改善慢性呼吸道疾病患者痰液样本的微生物组分析。从 33 个人类痰液样本中分离 DNA,并使用旨在用于 Illumina 平台的 QIASeq 筛选面板(16S/ITS;Qiagen Hilden,德国)创建文库。分析包括作为微生物标准对照的模拟群落(ZymoBIOMICS)。我们使用 Deblur 算法在属水平上识别细菌扩增子序列变体(ASV)。与 V7-V9 相比,V1-V2、V3-V4 和 V5-V7 的 alpha 多样性显著更高,并且 V1-V2 和 V7-V9 分析与 V3-V4 和 V5-V7 分析之间的组成差异显著。系统发育树证实了这些组成差异,后两者在组成上非常相似。组合高变区在区分细菌属的相对丰度方面显示出显著差异。曲线下面积表明,V1-V2 具有最高的分辨率,可从痰液样本中准确识别呼吸道细菌分类群。我们的研究证实,16S rRNA 高变区在痰液中提供了用于分类鉴定的显著差异。将微生物群落标准对照的分类群与样本分类群进行比较,V1-V2 组合表现出最高的灵敏度和特异性。因此,虽然第三代全长 16S rRNA 测序平台变得更加可用,但 V1-V2 高变区可用于痰液的分类鉴定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/afa6effbcfbb/41598_2023_30764_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/41e1584e27a0/41598_2023_30764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/926f12d1bcbd/41598_2023_30764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/fac9d40fc3d6/41598_2023_30764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/3a27b0a4434f/41598_2023_30764_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/0b943ec0a6e7/41598_2023_30764_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/43f2f12ac62b/41598_2023_30764_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/afa6effbcfbb/41598_2023_30764_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/41e1584e27a0/41598_2023_30764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/926f12d1bcbd/41598_2023_30764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/fac9d40fc3d6/41598_2023_30764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/3a27b0a4434f/41598_2023_30764_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/0b943ec0a6e7/41598_2023_30764_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/43f2f12ac62b/41598_2023_30764_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff30/9998635/afa6effbcfbb/41598_2023_30764_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Determining the most accurate 16S rRNA hypervariable region for taxonomic identification from respiratory samples.确定用于呼吸样本分类鉴定的最准确的 16S rRNA 高变区。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 9;13(1):3974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30764-z.
2
Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.引物、流程、参数:16S rRNA 基因测序中的问题。
mSphere. 2021 Feb 24;6(1):e01202-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01202-20.
3
Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.优化极低出生体重儿 16S rRNA 肠道微生物群分析。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Nov 2;18(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4229-x.
4
Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.细菌皮肤微生物群调查方法的优化:引物选择以及454平台与MiSeq平台的比较
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0927-4.
5
Comparison of different hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA for taxonomic profiling of vaginal microbiota using next-generation sequencing.比较使用下一代测序技术对阴道微生物群落进行分类分析时,16S rRNA 的不同高变区。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Apr;203(3):1159-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-02114-4. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
6
Development of an Analysis Pipeline Characterizing Multiple Hypervariable Regions of 16S rRNA Using Mock Samples.使用模拟样本开发表征16S rRNA多个高变区的分析流程
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 1;11(2):e0148047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148047. eCollection 2016.
7
Comparison of the full-length sequence and sub-regions of 16S rRNA gene for skin microbiome profiling.比较 16S rRNA 基因全长序列和亚区在皮肤微生物组分析中的应用。
mSystems. 2024 Jul 23;9(7):e0039924. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00399-24. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
8
Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies.口腔微生物组研究中用于16S rRNA基因测序的引物的比较分析
Methods Protoc. 2023 Aug 6;6(4):71. doi: 10.3390/mps6040071.
9
An accurate and efficient experimental approach for characterization of the complex oral microbiota.一种用于表征复杂口腔微生物群的准确且高效的实验方法。
Microbiome. 2015 Oct 5;3:48. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0110-9.
10
Sediment-associated bacterial community and predictive functionalities are influenced by choice of 16S ribosomal RNA hypervariable region(s): An amplicon-based diversity study.沉积物相关细菌群落及其预测功能受 16S 核糖体 RNA 高变区选择的影响:基于扩增子的多样性研究。
Genomics. 2020 Nov;112(6):4968-4979. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
First molecular phylogenetic and serological insights into infection in aborted ewes in Iraq: A cross-border comparative analysis.伊拉克流产母羊感染的首次分子系统发育和血清学见解:一项跨境比较分析。
Vet World. 2025 Jul;18(7):1899-1910. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2025.1899-1910. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
2
Why Are Long-Read Sequencing Methods Revolutionizing Microbiome Analysis?为什么长读长测序方法正在彻底改变微生物组分析?
Microorganisms. 2025 Aug 9;13(8):1861. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13081861.
3
QIIME2 enhances multi-amplicon sequencing data analysis: a standardized and validated open-source pipeline for comprehensive 16S rRNA gene profiling.

本文引用的文献

1
Elucidating the Beta-Diversity of the Microbiome: from Global Alignment to Local Alignment.阐明微生物群落的β多样性:从全局比对到局部比对。
mSystems. 2021 Aug 31;6(4):e0036321. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00363-21. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Bronchiectasis.铜绿假单胞菌在支气管扩张症中的作用。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug;42(4):587-594. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730921. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
3
Gut microbiome-based supervised machine learning for clinical diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases.基于肠道微生物组的监督机器学习用于炎症性肠病的临床诊断。
QIIME2增强了多扩增子测序数据分析:一个用于全面16S rRNA基因分析的标准化且经过验证的开源流程。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul 25:e0167325. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01673-25.
4
State-of-the-art approaches in the investigation of human seminal bacteriome using metagenomic methods.使用宏基因组学方法研究人类精液微生物组的最新技术进展。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 5;7:1557912. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1557912. eCollection 2025.
5
Microecological mechanisms of mountainous forest cultivated ginseng growth vigor and saponin accumulation, and the characterization of bionic microbial fertilizer.山地林下参生长势及皂苷积累的微生态机制与仿生微生物肥料特性
Front Microbiol. 2025 May 13;16:1548481. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1548481. eCollection 2025.
6
Fluorescence-based spectrometric and imaging methods and machine learning analyses for microbiota analysis.用于微生物群分析的基于荧光的光谱和成像方法及机器学习分析。
Mikrochim Acta. 2025 May 5;192(6):334. doi: 10.1007/s00604-025-07159-0.
7
Impacts of Tick Parasitism on the Rodent Gut Microbiome.蜱寄生对啮齿动物肠道微生物群的影响。
Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 12;13(4):888. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040888.
8
Biological effects of pulmonary, blood and gut microbiome alterations in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺部、血液和肠道微生物群改变的生物学效应。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Feb 25;11(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00667-2024. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Bumble bee gut microbial community structure differs between species and commercial suppliers, but metabolic potential remains largely consistent.大黄蜂肠道微生物群落结构在不同物种和商业供应商之间存在差异,但代谢潜力在很大程度上保持一致。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025 Mar 19;91(3):e0203624. doi: 10.1128/aem.02036-24. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
10
The Impact of Hangeshashinto on Symptoms and Gut Microbiota in Diarrhea-type Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis.半夏泻心汤对腹泻型肠易激综合征症状及肠道菌群的影响:一项回顾性分析
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2025 Jan 25;9(1):105-116. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-068. eCollection 2025.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2021 Mar 1;320(3):G328-G337. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00360.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Comparison of different hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA for taxonomic profiling of vaginal microbiota using next-generation sequencing.比较使用下一代测序技术对阴道微生物群落进行分类分析时,16S rRNA 的不同高变区。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Apr;203(3):1159-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-02114-4. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
5
Reconsidering ventilator-associated pneumonia from a new dimension of the lung microbiome.从肺部微生物组的新维度重新考虑呼吸机相关性肺炎。
EBioMedicine. 2020 Oct;60:102995. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102995. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
An empirically derived method for measuring human gut microbiome alpha diversity: Demonstrated utility in predicting health-related outcomes among a human clinical sample.一种用于测量人体肠道微生物多样性 alpha 的经验推导方法:在人类临床样本中预测健康相关结果的实用证明。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229204. eCollection 2020.
7
Lung Microbiota Predict Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients.肺部微生物组预测危重症患者的临床结局。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar 1;201(5):555-563. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1487OC.
8
Doing More with Less: A Comparison of 16S Hypervariable Regions in Search of Defining the Shrimp Microbiota.以更少投入实现更多成果:比较16S高变区以探寻对虾微生物群的定义
Microorganisms. 2020 Jan 17;8(1):134. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010134.
9
The biology of pulmonary exacerbations in bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症肺部恶化的生物学。
Eur Respir Rev. 2019 Nov 20;28(154). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0055-2019. Print 2019 Dec 31.
10
Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa alters sputum viscoelasticity in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.黏液化铜绿假单胞菌改变非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症患者的痰液粘弹性。
Respir Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;154:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jun 11.