Clinical Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Jul;136(13-14):382-389. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02157-9. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Since January 2022, assisted suicide (AS) in Austria is legal under certain conditions. One of these conditions is informative consultations with two physicians, one of whom must be qualified in palliative medicine. Patients who are thinking about AS can approach palliative care institutions. This study aims to assess the availability and nature of Austrian palliative care institutions' web-based statements about AS.
In this qualitative study, the websites of all Austrian palliative care units (n = 43) and all Austrian inpatient hospices (n = 14) were searched for possible statements on AS once in February 2022 and once in August 2022 using the three search terms "suicide", "assisted", and "euthanasia". The findings were subsequently evaluated using thematic analysis and NVivo software.
Statements or texts that included positions on AS were found on the websites of 11 institutions (19%). The results covered three main themes 1) demarcation: denial of involvement and judgment about AS, 2) duty: handling of requests and describing the target group of care recipients, and 3) explanation: experience, values, concerns, and demands.
The results of this study indicate that people in Austria who wish to have AS and who may use the internet as their first source of information largely find no relevant information. There is no online statement of a palliative care or hospice institution that endorses AS. Positions on AS are mostly lacking, while reluctant attitudes of Christian institutions are predominant.
自 2022 年 1 月以来,奥地利在某些条件下允许协助自杀(AS)。其中一个条件是与两名医生进行信息咨询,其中一名必须具备姑息治疗资质。考虑 AS 的患者可以向姑息治疗机构寻求帮助。本研究旨在评估奥地利姑息治疗机构网站上关于 AS 的信息的可用性和性质。
在这项定性研究中,于 2022 年 2 月和 2022 年 8 月两次使用“自杀”、“协助”和“安乐死”这三个搜索词,搜索所有奥地利姑息治疗单位(n=43)和所有奥地利住院临终关怀机构(n=14)的网站,以查找可能关于 AS 的声明。随后使用主题分析和 NVivo 软件对调查结果进行评估。
在 11 个机构(19%)的网站上找到了关于 AS 的声明或文本。结果涵盖了三个主题:1)划界:否认参与和对 AS 的判断;2)职责:处理请求和描述护理对象的目标群体;3)解释:经验、价值观、关注点和要求。
本研究结果表明,在奥地利,希望进行 AS 且可能将互联网作为其主要信息来源的人,他们在很大程度上找不到相关信息。没有姑息治疗或临终关怀机构的网站发表支持 AS 的声明。AS 的立场大多缺失,而基督教机构的不情愿态度占主导地位。