School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; International Institute for Sustainability Australia, Canberra, ACT, 2602, Australia.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul;38(7):643-653. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Ecosystem restoration conventionally focuses on ecological targets. However, while ecological targets are crucial to mobilizing political, social, and financial capital, they do not encapsulate the need to: integrate social, economic, and ecological dimensions and systems approaches; reconcile global targets and local objectives; and measure the rate of progress toward multiple and synergistic goals. Restoration is better conceived as an inclusive social-ecological process that integrates diverse values, practices, knowledge, and restoration objectives across temporal and spatial scales and stakeholder groups. Taking a more process-based approach will ultimately enable greater social-ecological transformation, greater restoration effectiveness, and more long-lasting benefits to people and nature across time and place.
生态系统恢复传统上侧重于生态目标。然而，虽然生态目标对于调动政治、社会和财政资本至关重要，但它们不能涵盖以下需求：整合社会、经济和生态层面以及系统方法；协调全球目标和地方目标；以及衡量朝着多个协同目标的进展速度。恢复更好地被视为一个包容的社会-生态过程，它整合了不同的价值观、实践、知识和跨越时间和空间尺度以及利益相关者群体的恢复目标。采取更基于过程的方法最终将使社会-生态转型更加彻底，恢复效果更好，并且在时间和地点上为人类和自然带来更持久的利益。
