• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让脊髓损伤患者参与研究:一项关于消费者报酬的政策。

Involving people with lived experience of spinal cord injury in research: a policy for consumer remuneration.

机构信息

Spinal Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2023 May;61(5):285-287. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00888-0. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-023-00888-0
PMID:36899098
Abstract

To ensure that research outcomes are relevant and meet the needs of the spinal cord jury (SCI) community, it is essential that people with lived experience of SCI ('consumers') are actively involved in all stages of the research process. One of the goals of the Spinal Research Institute (SRI) ( www.thesri.org ) is to facilitate this active engagement of consumers in research. In order to support consumer involvement, appropriate resources, including remuneration, need to be in place. This paper sets out the process undertaken by the SRI to develop a Policy for Consumer Remuneration. It addresses the rationale for creating a policy, the resources used and shares the model that defines the levels of consumer engagement and associated remuneration. The SRI Policy for Consumer Remuneration sets a standard for the SCI research field, which can serve as a model for Australia and as a template for other countries.

摘要

为确保研究成果具有相关性并满足脊髓损伤陪审团(SCI)社区的需求,让有脊髓损伤生活经历的人(“消费者”)积极参与研究过程的各个阶段至关重要。脊髓研究所以(www.thesri.org)的目标之一是促进消费者在研究中的这种积极参与。为了支持消费者的参与,需要有适当的资源,包括报酬。本文阐述了脊髓研究所制定消费者报酬政策所经历的过程。它解决了制定政策的基本原理、所使用的资源,并分享了定义消费者参与程度和相关报酬的模式。脊髓研究所消费者报酬政策为 SCI 研究领域设定了一个标准,可为澳大利亚提供一个范例,并为其他国家提供一个模板。

相似文献

1
Involving people with lived experience of spinal cord injury in research: a policy for consumer remuneration.让脊髓损伤患者参与研究:一项关于消费者报酬的政策。
Spinal Cord. 2023 May;61(5):285-287. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00888-0. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
Consumer involvement in Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) projects - lessons from Australia.消费者参与药品合理使用(QUM)项目——来自澳大利亚的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec 1;5:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-75.
3
Consumer engagement in doctoral research - what difference does it make?消费者参与博士研究——有何不同?
Spinal Cord. 2023 Feb;61(2):175-183. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00871-1. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
4
Mental health consumer involvement in occupational therapy education in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区精神健康消费者参与职业治疗教育的情况。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Feb;67(1):83-93. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12634. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
5
A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.澳大利亚消费者参与临床试验的概况:一项针对临床试验网络和研究机构的全国性调查结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 5;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00338-w.
6
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes.利用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话过程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第三部分:结果。
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):729-37. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.87. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
7
The experiences of social and community participation of people with non-traumatic spinal cord injury.非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的社会和社区参与经历。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Feb;66(1):61-67. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12522. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Designing interactivity on consumer health websites: PARAFORUM for spinal cord injury.设计消费者健康网站的交互性:脊髓损伤患者的PARAFORUM
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):459-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material.消费者参与制定医疗保健政策与研究、临床实践指南及患者信息材料的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2.
10
"I don't think we've quite got there yet": The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers.“我认为我们尚未完全达成目标”:心理健康消费者研究者的盟友关系体验。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Oct;25(8):453-462. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12476.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study.研究者和临床医生对参与临床前脊髓研究的患者和公众的看法(PPI):一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13967. doi: 10.1111/hex.13967.
2
The Development of Principles for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: A Modified Delphi Study.患者和公众参与(PPI)在临床前脊髓研究中的原则的发展:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14130. doi: 10.1111/hex.14130.
3
Shining a light on the road towards conducting principle-based co-production research in rehabilitation.

本文引用的文献

1
Equitable partnerships between scientists and persons living with spinal cord injury will strengthen research scope, quality, and outcomes.科学家和脊髓损伤患者之间公平的伙伴关系将加强研究的范围、质量和成果。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2021 Dec 1;34(6):783-788. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000989.
2
Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.在合作中进行和传播脊髓损伤研究的综合知识转化指导原则。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
照亮康复领域开展基于原则的合作生产研究之路。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Apr 10;5:1386746. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1386746. eCollection 2024.