Marzok Mohamed, Kandeel Mahmoud, Babiker Hussein, Alkhodair Khalid M, Farag Alshimaa, Ibrahim Hussam, El-Ashker Maged, Alghuwainem Yousef, El-Khodery Sabry
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33511, Egypt.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;13(5):809. doi: 10.3390/ani13050809.
The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic meta-analysis on echocardiographic measurements in normal Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses. The current systematic meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). All the available published papers on the reference values of echocardiographic assessment via M-mode echocardiography were searched, and fifteen studies were finally selected for analysis. In both fixed and random effect, the confidence interval (CI) for the interventricular septum (IVS) was 2.8-3.1 and 4.7-7.5; for the left ventricular free-wall (LVFW) thickness, it was 2.9-3.2 and 4.2-6.7; and for the left ventricular internal diameter (LVID), it was -5.0-4.6 and -10.0--6.7, respectively. For IVS, the Q statistic, I-squared, and tau-squared were 925.3, 98.1, and 7.9, respectively. Similarly, for LVFW, all the effects were on the positive side of zero, with a range of 1.3-68.1. The CI indicated a significant variation among the studies (fixed, 2.9-3.2; random, 4.2-6.7). The z-values of LVFW for fixed and random effects were, respectively, 41.1 ( < 0.001) and 8.5 ( < 0.001). However, the Q statistic was 886.6 ( < 0.001). Moreover, the I-squared was 98.08, and the tau-squared was 6.6. By contrast, the effects of LVID fell on the negative side of zero, (2.8-83.9). The present meta-analysis provides an overview of the echocardiographic measurements of cardiac diameters in healthy Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses. The meta-analysis indicates variations in results among different studies. This result should be considered when evaluating a horse for heart disease and each case should be evaluated independently.
本研究的目的是对纯种马和标准赛马的超声心动图测量进行系统的荟萃分析。当前的系统荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)。检索了所有关于通过M型超声心动图进行超声心动图评估参考值的已发表论文,最终选择了15项研究进行分析。在固定效应和随机效应中,室间隔(IVS)的置信区间(CI)分别为2.8 - 3.1和4.7 - 7.5;左心室游离壁(LVFW)厚度的置信区间分别为2.9 - 3.2和4.2 - 6.7;左心室内径(LVID)的置信区间分别为 - 5.0 - 4.6和 - 10.0 - - 6.7。对于IVS,Q统计量、I²和τ²分别为925.3、98.1和7.9。同样,对于LVFW,所有效应均在零的正值一侧,范围为1.3 - 68.1。置信区间表明各研究之间存在显著差异(固定效应,2.9 - 3.2;随机效应,4.2 - 6.7)。LVFW在固定效应和随机效应下的z值分别为41.1(<0.001)和8.5(<0.001)。然而,Q统计量为886.6(<0.001)。此外,I²为98.08,τ²为6.6。相比之下,LVID的效应落在零的负值一侧,为(2.8 - 83.9)。本荟萃分析概述了健康纯种马和标准赛马心脏直径的超声心动图测量情况。荟萃分析表明不同研究结果存在差异。在评估马匹是否患有心脏病时应考虑这一结果,并且每个病例都应独立评估。